Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Big Tree Cloud Holdings Limited (DSY) vs Unilever PLC (UL) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | DSY | 16.4% revenue growth vs UL's 1.9% |
| Value | UL | Lower P/E (19.6x vs 254.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | UL | 10.2% net margin vs DSY's -4.4% |
| Stability / Safety | UL | Beta 0.03 vs DSY's 1.22 |
| Dividends | UL | 2.8% yield; DSY pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | UL | +35.3% vs DSY's -92.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | UL | 16.0% ROA vs DSY's -3.6%, ROIC 15.3% vs -0.1% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Big Tree Cloud Holdings is a Chinese manufacturer and seller of personal care products and consumer goods. It generates revenue primarily through product sales — including skincare, haircare, and household items — with manufacturing operations supporting both its own brands and potentially contract manufacturing. The company benefits from its position as a subsidiary of Ploutos Group Limited, which provides operational scale and distribution advantages in the Chinese consumer goods market.
Unilever is a global consumer goods giant selling everyday household and personal care products through a vast portfolio of trusted brands. It generates revenue primarily from three segments: Beauty & Personal Care (~40% of sales), Foods & Refreshment (~35%), and Home Care (~25%), with strong emerging markets exposure. Its competitive moat lies in its massive scale, extensive distribution network, and portfolio of iconic brands that command consumer loyalty across price points.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
UL leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Financial Metrics and Valuation Metrics.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
UL is the larger business by revenue, generating $120.1B annually — 16394.0x DSY's $7M. UL is the more profitable business, keeping 10.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DSY's -4.4%.
| Metric | DSYBig Tree Cloud Ho… | ULUnilever PLC |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $120.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$25,648 | $21.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$323,757 | $12.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $14.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.9% | +71.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -13.1% | +15.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.4% | +10.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -34.9% | +12.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -3.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -98.8% | -3.4% |
Valuation Metrics
At 27.3x trailing earnings, UL trades at a 89% valuation discount to DSY's 254.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, UL's 14.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DSY's 163.4x.
| Metric | DSYBig Tree Cloud Ho… | ULUnilever PLC |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $179M | $161.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $181M | $190.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 254.47x | 27.30x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 19.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 20.02x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 163.41x | 14.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 24.40x | 2.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 6.95x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 17.56x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UL delivers a 61.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $61 in annual profit, vs $2 for DSY. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UL scores 5/9 vs DSY's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | DSYBig Tree Cloud Ho… | ULUnilever PLC |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.4% | +61.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.6% | +16.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.1% | +15.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.1% | +17.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $24.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $748,099 | $6.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $30.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.35x | 20.96x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in UL five years ago would be worth $16,056 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $229 for DSY. Over the past 12 months, UL leads with a +35.3% total return vs DSY's -92.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UL at 17.1% vs DSY's -71.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | DSYBig Tree Cloud Ho… | ULUnilever PLC |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -46.9% | +14.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -92.1% | +35.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.7% | +60.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.7% | +60.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.7% | +120.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -71.6% | +17.1% |
Risk & Volatility
UL is the less volatile stock with a 0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DSY's 1.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UL currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs DSY's 2.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | DSYBig Tree Cloud Ho… | ULUnilever PLC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.22x | 0.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $146.60 | $74.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.27 | $56.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.1% | +98.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 24.6 | 61.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16K | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
UL is the only dividend payer here at 2.76% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | DSYBig Tree Cloud Ho… | ULUnilever PLC |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $65.55 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.1% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | May 24 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Big Tree Cloud Hold… (DSY) | 100 | 3.65 | -96.4% |
| Unilever PLC (UL) | 100 | 124.45 | +24.4% |
Unilever PLC (UL) returned +61% over 5 years vs Big Tree Cloud Hold… (DSY)'s -98%. A $10,000 investment in UL 5 years ago would be worth $16,056 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Big Tree Cloud Hold… (DSY) | $2M | $7M | +277.5% |
| Unilever PLC (UL) | $53.3B | $60.8B | +14.1% |
Unilever PLC's revenue grew from $53.3B (2015) to $60.8B (2024) — a 1.5% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Big Tree Cloud Hold… (DSY) | -97.6% | 8.7% | +109.0% |
| Unilever PLC (UL) | 9.2% | 9.5% | +2.6% |
Unilever PLC's net margin went from 9% (2015) to 9% (2024).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 8 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unilever PLC (UL) | 25.9 | 24.8 | -4.2% |
Unilever PLC has traded in a 15x–29x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~27x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Big Tree Cloud Hold… (DSY) | -0 | 0.01 | +539.3% |
| Unilever PLC (UL) | 1.72 | 2.29 | +33.1% |
Unilever PLC's EPS grew from $1.72 (2015) to $2.29 (2024) — a 3% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Big Tree Cloud Holdings Limited generated $-4M FCF in 2024 (-128% vs 2022). Unilever PLC generated $8B FCF in 2024 (+13% vs 2021).
DSY vs UL: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DSY or UL a better buy right now?
Unilever PLC (UL) offers the better valuation at 27.3x trailing P/E (19.6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Unilever PLC (UL) a "Hold" — based on 35 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DSY or UL?
On trailing P/E, Unilever PLC (UL) is the cheapest at 27.3x versus Big Tree Cloud Holdings Limited at 254.5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DSY or UL?
Over the past 5 years, Unilever PLC (UL) delivered a total return of +60.6%, compared to -97.7% for Big Tree Cloud Holdings Limited (DSY). A $10,000 investment in UL five years ago would be worth approximately $16K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UL returned +120.1% versus DSY's -97.7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DSY or UL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Unilever PLC (UL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.03β versus Big Tree Cloud Holdings Limited's 1.22β — meaning DSY is approximately 3880% more volatile than UL relative to the S&P 500.
05Which has better profit margins — DSY or UL?
Unilever PLC (UL) is the more profitable company, earning 9.5% net margin versus 8.7% for Big Tree Cloud Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 9.5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UL leads at 15.5% versus -0.4% for DSY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UL leads at 100.0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — DSY or UL?
In this comparison, UL (2.8% yield) pays a dividend. DSY does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is DSY or UL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Unilever PLC (UL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.03), 2.8% yield, +120.1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (UL: +120.1%, DSY: -97.7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between DSY and UL?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. UL pays a dividend while DSY does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.