Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Phoenix New Media Limited (FENG) vs Alphabet Inc. (GOOG) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | GOOG | 15.1% revenue growth vs FENG's 1.7% |
| Value | FENG | Lower P/E (0.2x vs 27.2x) |
| Quality / Margins | GOOG | 32.8% net margin vs FENG's -6.4% |
| Stability / Safety | FENG | Beta 0.54 vs GOOG's 0.98, lower leverage |
| Dividends | GOOG | 0.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; FENG pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | GOOG | +81.3% vs FENG's -22.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | GOOG | 22.2% ROA vs FENG's -3.0%, ROIC 24.7% vs -7.7% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Phoenix New Media operates a Chinese digital media platform that delivers news, video, and entertainment content across web and mobile channels. It generates revenue primarily from online advertising services (roughly 70-80% of total) supplemented by paid services including mobile content subscriptions and digital reading applications. The company's competitive advantage lies in its established Phoenix TV brand recognition and its comprehensive content ecosystem spanning news, finance, and entertainment verticals.
Alphabet is a technology conglomerate best known for its Google search engine and digital ecosystem. It generates over 80% of its revenue from digital advertising—primarily through Google Search, YouTube, and its ad network—with the remainder coming from Google Cloud services and other ventures. Its dominant competitive advantage lies in its massive user data network, which creates powerful network effects and makes its advertising targeting capabilities nearly impossible for competitors to replicate at scale.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
GOOG leads in 4 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). FENG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
GOOG is the larger business by revenue, generating $402.9B annually — 529.2x FENG's $761M. GOOG is the more profitable business, keeping 32.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FENG's -6.4%. On growth, FENG holds the edge at +22.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FENGPhoenix New Media… | GOOGAlphabet Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $761M | $402.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$43M | $150.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$49M | $132.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $73.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.6% | +59.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.9% | +32.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.4% | +32.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.0% | +18.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.3% | +18.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.0% | +31.2% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FENGPhoenix New Media… | GOOGAlphabet Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $552M | $1.69T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $472M | $1.73T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.68x | 28.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.24x | 27.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.97x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.38x | 4.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.13x | 9.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 23.08x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOG delivers a 31.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-5 for FENG. FENG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GOOG's 0.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GOOG scores 7/9 vs FENG's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | FENGPhoenix New Media… | GOOGAlphabet Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.6% | +31.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.0% | +22.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.7% | +24.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.4% | +30.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$551M | $41.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $608M | $30.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $57M | $72.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 903.26x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in GOOG five years ago would be worth $30,060 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,593 for FENG. Over the past 12 months, GOOG leads with a +81.3% total return vs FENG's -22.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOG at 51.3% vs FENG's -7.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FENGPhoenix New Media… | GOOGAlphabet Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.8% | -1.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -22.7% | +81.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.4% | +246.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.1% | +200.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.0% | +796.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.0% | +51.3% |
Risk & Volatility
FENG is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GOOG's 0.98 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOG currently trades 88.9% from its 52-week high vs FENG's 47.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FENGPhoenix New Media… | GOOGAlphabet Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.54x | 0.98x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.65 | $350.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.28 | $142.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +47.7% | +88.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.0 | 40.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 17.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FENG as "Buy" and GOOG as "Buy". GOOG is the only dividend payer here at 0.26% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | FENGPhoenix New Media… | GOOGAlphabet Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $356.91 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 79 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +2.7% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phoenix New Media L… (FENG) | 100 | 16.85 | -83.1% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOG) | 100 | 496.54 | +396.5% |
Alphabet Inc. (GOOG) returned +201% over 5 years vs Phoenix New Media L… (FENG)'s -84%. A $10,000 investment in GOOG 5 years ago would be worth $30,060 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phoenix New Media L… (FENG) | $1.4B | $704M | -51.3% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOG) | $90.3B | $403.0B | +346.4% |
Alphabet Inc.'s revenue grew from $90.3B (2016) to $403.0B (2025) — a 18.1% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phoenix New Media L… (FENG) | 5.6% | -7.6% | -236.4% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOG) | 21.6% | 32.8% | +52.0% |
Alphabet Inc.'s net margin went from 22% (2016) to 33% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phoenix New Media L… (FENG) | 14.1 | 0.2 | -98.6% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOG) | 58.1 | 29 | -50.1% |
Phoenix New Media Limited has traded in a 0x–14x P/E range over 3 years; current trailing P/E is ~-3x. Alphabet Inc. has traded in a 20x–58x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~29x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phoenix New Media L… (FENG) | 6.24 | -4.46 | -171.5% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOG) | 1.39 | 10.81 | +677.7% |
Alphabet Inc.'s EPS grew from $1.39 (2016) to $10.81 (2025) — a 26% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Phoenix New Media Limited generated $-50M FCF in 2024 (+69% vs 2021). Alphabet Inc. generated $73B FCF in 2025 (+9% vs 2021).
FENG vs GOOG: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FENG or GOOG a better buy right now?
Alphabet Inc. (GOOG) offers the better valuation at 28.8x trailing P/E (27.2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Phoenix New Media Limited (FENG) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FENG or GOOG?
On forward P/E, Phoenix New Media Limited is actually cheaper at 0.2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FENG or GOOG?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc. (GOOG) delivered a total return of +200.6%, compared to -84.1% for Phoenix New Media Limited (FENG). A $10,000 investment in GOOG five years ago would be worth approximately $30K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOG returned +796.7% versus FENG's -50.0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FENG or GOOG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Phoenix New Media Limited (FENG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.54β versus Alphabet Inc.'s 0.98β — meaning GOOG is approximately 82% more volatile than FENG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Phoenix New Media Limited (FENG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 17% for Alphabet Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — FENG or GOOG?
Alphabet Inc. (GOOG) is the more profitable company, earning 32.8% net margin versus -7.6% for Phoenix New Media Limited — meaning it keeps 32.8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOG leads at 32.1% versus -9.2% for FENG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GOOG leads at 59.7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is FENG or GOOG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Phoenix New Media Limited (FENG) trades at 0.2x forward P/E versus 27.2x for Alphabet Inc. — 27.0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
07Which pays a better dividend — FENG or GOOG?
In this comparison, GOOG (0.3% yield) pays a dividend. FENG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is FENG or GOOG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alphabet Inc. (GOOG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.98), +796.7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOOG: +796.7%, FENG: -50.0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FENG and GOOG?
These companies operate in different sectors (FENG (Communication Services) and GOOG (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 11%
- Gross Margin > 27%