Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare BitFuFu Inc. (FUFU) vs Morgan Stanley (MS) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FUFU | 63.1% revenue growth vs MS's 16.8% |
| Value | MS | Lower P/E (14.8x vs 19.2x) |
| Quality / Margins | MS | 13.0% net margin vs FUFU's 11.6% |
| Stability / Safety | FUFU | Beta 1.10 vs MS's 1.35, lower leverage |
| Dividends | MS | 2.3% yield; 11-year raise streak; FUFU pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | MS | +28.0% vs FUFU's -52.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FUFU | 5.0% ROA vs MS's 1.2%, ROIC 46.2% vs 2.9% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
BitFuFu operates a digital asset mining platform that provides cloud-mining services — allowing customers to rent mining capacity without owning physical hardware. It generates revenue primarily through cloud-mining service fees and miner hosting services, with additional income from miner sales and rental arrangements. The company's advantage lies in its vertically integrated infrastructure — owning and operating mining facilities — which provides scale and operational efficiency in the capital-intensive mining industry.
Morgan Stanley is a global investment bank and wealth management firm that provides financial services to institutions, corporations, and individuals. It generates revenue primarily through investment banking fees (~30%), wealth management fees (~40%), and trading & sales activities (~25%), with the remainder from investment management. The company's competitive advantage lies in its elite brand reputation, global institutional relationships, and integrated platform that connects investment banking with wealth management.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
MS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Total Returns). FUFU leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
MS is the larger business by revenue, generating $103.1B annually — 222.6x FUFU's $463M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 13.0% (MS) to 11.6% (FUFU).
| Metric | FUFUBitFuFu Inc. | MSMorgan Stanley |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $463M | $103.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $36M | $26.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $25M | $16.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$6.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +55.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.3% | +17.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.6% | +13.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -51.1% | -2.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.2% | +48.9% |
Valuation Metrics
At 7.2x trailing earnings, FUFU trades at a 66% valuation discount to MS's 20.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FUFU's 4.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MS's 24.2x.
| Metric | FUFUBitFuFu Inc. | MSMorgan Stanley |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $387M | $264.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $383M | $549.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.18x | 20.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.22x | 14.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.22x | 24.15x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.83x | 2.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.41x | 2.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MS delivers a 14.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $11 for FUFU. FUFU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MS's 3.42x.
| Metric | FUFUBitFuFu Inc. | MSMorgan Stanley |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.4% | +14.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.0% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +46.2% | +2.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +30.3% | +3.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 3.42x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $284.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $38M | $75.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $35M | $360.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.18x | 0.44x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in MS five years ago would be worth $23,095 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,602 for FUFU. Over the past 12 months, MS leads with a +28.0% total return vs FUFU's -52.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MS at 22.5% vs FUFU's -36.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FUFUBitFuFu Inc. | MSMorgan Stanley |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.4% | -7.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -52.6% | +28.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.0% | +83.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.0% | +131.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.0% | +662.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -36.2% | +22.5% |
Risk & Volatility
FUFU is the less volatile stock with a 1.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MS's 1.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MS currently trades 86.4% from its 52-week high vs FUFU's 40.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FUFUBitFuFu Inc. | MSMorgan Stanley |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.10x | 1.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.85 | $192.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.05 | $94.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +40.5% | +86.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.2 | 51.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 70K | 5.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FUFU as "Buy" and MS as "Buy". MS is the only dividend payer here at 2.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | FUFUBitFuFu Inc. | MSMorgan Stanley |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $196.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 50 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.81 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.6% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Feb 24 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| BitFuFu Inc. (FUFU) | 100 | 29.97 | -70.0% |
| Morgan Stanley (MS) | 100 | 214.04 | +114.0% |
Morgan Stanley (MS) returned +131% over 5 years vs BitFuFu Inc. (FUFU)'s -74%. A $10,000 investment in MS 5 years ago would be worth $23,095 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| BitFuFu Inc. (FUFU) | $1M | $463M | +37657.5% |
| Morgan Stanley (MS) | $36.0B | $103.1B | +186.5% |
Morgan Stanley's revenue grew from $36.0B (2015) to $103.1B (2024) — a 12.4% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| BitFuFu Inc. (FUFU) | -90.1% | 11.6% | +112.9% |
| Morgan Stanley (MS) | 17.0% | 13.0% | -23.7% |
Morgan Stanley's net margin went from 17% (2015) to 13% (2024).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 8 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Morgan Stanley (MS) | 17 | 15.8 | -7.1% |
Morgan Stanley has traded in a 8x–18x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~21x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| BitFuFu Inc. (FUFU) | -0.01 | 0.33 | +4814.3% |
| Morgan Stanley (MS) | 2.91 | 7.95 | +173.2% |
Morgan Stanley's EPS grew from $2.91 (2015) to $7.95 (2024) — a 12% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
BitFuFu Inc. generated $-237M FCF in 2024 (-131393% vs 2021). Morgan Stanley generated $-2B FCF in 2024 (-107% vs 2021).
FUFU vs MS: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FUFU or MS a better buy right now?
BitFuFu Inc. (FUFU) offers the better valuation at 7.2x trailing P/E (19.2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BitFuFu Inc. (FUFU) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FUFU or MS?
On trailing P/E, BitFuFu Inc. (FUFU) is the cheapest at 7.2x versus Morgan Stanley at 20.9x. On forward P/E, Morgan Stanley is actually cheaper at 14.8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FUFU or MS?
Over the past 5 years, Morgan Stanley (MS) delivered a total return of +131.0%, compared to -74.0% for BitFuFu Inc. (FUFU). A $10,000 investment in MS five years ago would be worth approximately $23K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MS returned +662.8% versus FUFU's -74.0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FUFU or MS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BitFuFu Inc. (FUFU) is the lower-risk stock at 1.10β versus Morgan Stanley's 1.35β — meaning MS is approximately 23% more volatile than FUFU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BitFuFu Inc. (FUFU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 3% for Morgan Stanley — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — FUFU or MS?
Morgan Stanley (MS) is the more profitable company, earning 13.0% net margin versus 11.6% for BitFuFu Inc. — meaning it keeps 13.0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MS leads at 17.1% versus 14.3% for FUFU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MS leads at 55.6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is FUFU or MS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Morgan Stanley (MS) trades at 14.8x forward P/E versus 19.2x for BitFuFu Inc. — 4.4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
07Which pays a better dividend — FUFU or MS?
In this comparison, MS (2.3% yield) pays a dividend. FUFU does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is FUFU or MS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Morgan Stanley (MS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2.3% yield, +662.8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MS: +662.8%, FUFU: -74.0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FUFU and MS?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: FUFU is a small-cap deep-value stock; MS is a large-cap quality compounder stock. MS pays a dividend while FUFU does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.