Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Insight Molecular Diagnostics Inc. (IMDX) vs Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth |  IMDX | 25.1% revenue growth vs REGN's 1.0% |
| Quality / Margins |  REGN | 31.4% net margin vs IMDX's -13.8% |
| Stability / Safety | IMDX | Beta 0.43 vs REGN's 0.58 |
| Dividends | REGN | 0.4% yield; 1-year raise streak; IMDX pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | IMDX | +95.1% vs REGN's +14.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | REGN | 11.1% ROA vs IMDX's -138.3% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
IMDXDividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.43
Growth exposure
IMDXRev growth 25.1%, EPS growth -24.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -5.1%
Long-term compounding (10Y)
REGN95.3% 10Y total return vs IMDX's -94.1%
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
IMDXLower volatility, beta 0.43, current ratio 1.62x
Defensive / Recession hedge
IMDXBeta 0.43, current ratio 1.62x
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Insight Molecular Diagnostics is a molecular diagnostics company that develops and commercializes proprietary laboratory-developed tests for cancer detection. It generates revenue primarily from its DetermaRx test for early-stage lung cancer and DetermaIO gene expression assay — along with biomarker discovery services for pharmaceutical companies. The company's competitive advantage lies in its proprietary gene expression technology and collaborations with major sequencing platform providers like Life Technologies.
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals is a biotechnology company that discovers, develops, and commercializes innovative medicines for serious diseases. It generates revenue primarily from sales of its flagship products — EYLEA for eye diseases (~60% of revenue) and Dupixent for inflammatory conditions (~30%) — with additional income from collaborations and royalties. The company's competitive advantage lies in its proprietary VelocImmune technology platform for creating human antibodies and its deep expertise in genetic research, which enables rapid drug discovery and development.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
REGN 3IMDX 0REGN4/6 metricsREGN6/7 metricsREGN5/6 metricsREGN leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Financial Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
REGN is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.3B annually — 3258.3x IMDX's $4M. REGN is the more profitable business, keeping 31.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IMDX's -13.8%. On growth, IMDX holds the edge at +126.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | IMDXInsight Molecular… | REGNRegeneron Pharmac… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $14.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$59M | $4.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$61M | $4.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$24M | $3.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.7% | +86.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -13.9% | +25.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.8% | +31.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.4% | +22.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +126.1% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +65.4% | -2.5% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | IMDXInsight Molecular… | REGNRegeneron Pharmac… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $95M | $107.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $90M | $91.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.16x | 18.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.23x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.97x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 21.60x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 50.34x | 7.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 26.32x |
Profitability & Efficiency
REGN delivers a 14.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-15 for IMDX. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), REGN scores 7/9 vs IMDX's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | IMDXInsight Molecular… | REGNRegeneron Pharmac… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -14.8% | +14.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -138.3% | +11.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +12.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -127.8% | +10.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | -$16.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $18.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -536.86x | 120.42x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in REGN five years ago would be worth $17,573 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $626 for IMDX. Over the past 12 months, IMDX leads with a +95.1% total return vs REGN's +14.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors REGN at 0.2% vs IMDX's -8.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | IMDXInsight Molecular… | REGNRegeneron Pharmac… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -24.2% | +0.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +95.1% | +14.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.7% | +0.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.7% | +75.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.1% | +95.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.2% | +0.2% |
Risk & Volatility
IMDX is the less volatile stock with a 0.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than REGN's 0.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. REGN currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs IMDX's 63.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | IMDXInsight Molecular… | REGNRegeneron Pharmac… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.43x | 0.58x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.51 | $821.11 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.33 | $476.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +63.7% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.4 | 52.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 41K | 670K |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates IMDX as "Buy" and REGN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 93.5% upside for IMDX (target: $11) vs 9.8% for REGN (target: $857). REGN is the only dividend payer here at 0.44% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | IMDXInsight Molecular… | REGNRegeneron Pharmac… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.50 | $857.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.41 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.2% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Mar 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Insight Molecular D… (IMDX) | 100 | 12.44 | -87.6% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 100 | 169.13 | +69.1% |
Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) returned +76% over 5 years vs Insight Molecular D… (IMDX)'s -94%. A $10,000 investment in REGN 5 years ago would be worth $17,573 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Insight Molecular D… (IMDX) | $0.00 | $2M | — |
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | $4.9B | $14.3B | +195.1% |
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s revenue grew from $4.9B (2016) to $14.3B (2025) — a 12.8% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Insight Molecular D… (IMDX) | -24.6% | -32.3% | -31.0% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 18.4% | 31.4% | +70.5% |
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s net margin went from 18% (2016) to 31% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 36.4 | 18.6 | -48.9% |
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. has traded in a 9x–36x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~19x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Insight Molecular D… (IMDX) | -8.42 | -4.66 | +44.6% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 7.7 | 41.48 | +438.7% |
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s EPS grew from $7.70 (2016) to $41.48 (2025) — a 21% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Insight Molecular Diagnostics Inc. generated $-21M FCF in 2024 (+44% vs 2021). Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. generated $4B FCF in 2025 (-38% vs 2021).
IMDX vs REGN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IMDX or REGN a better buy right now?
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) offers the better valuation at 18.8x trailing P/E (17.2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Insight Molecular Diagnostics Inc. (IMDX) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — IMDX or REGN?
Over the past 5 years, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) delivered a total return of +75.7%, compared to -93.7% for Insight Molecular Diagnostics Inc. (IMDX). A $10,000 investment in REGN five years ago would be worth approximately $18K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: REGN returned +95.3% versus IMDX's -94.1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — IMDX or REGN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Insight Molecular Diagnostics Inc. (IMDX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.43β versus Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s 0.58β — meaning REGN is approximately 33% more volatile than IMDX relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — IMDX or REGN?
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) is the more profitable company, earning 31.4% net margin versus -32.3% for Insight Molecular Diagnostics Inc. — meaning it keeps 31.4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: REGN leads at 25.7% versus -32.5% for IMDX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — REGN leads at 86.3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Is IMDX or REGN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IMDX: 93.5% to $10.50.
06Which pays a better dividend — IMDX or REGN?
In this comparison, REGN (0.4% yield) pays a dividend. IMDX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is IMDX or REGN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Insight Molecular Diagnostics Inc. (IMDX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.43)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IMDX: -94.1%, REGN: +95.3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between IMDX and REGN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.