Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare American Bitcoin Corp (ABTC) vs TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | WULF | 102.3% revenue growth vs ABTC's 10.1% |
| Quality / Margins | ABTC | 6.0% net margin vs WULF's -51.7% |
| Stability / Safety | ABTC | Beta 2.15 vs WULF's 2.58, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | WULF | +287.1% vs ABTC's -26.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ABTC | -8.8% ROA vs WULF's -23.0%, ROIC 47.2% vs -10.6% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
American Bitcoin Corp is a Bitcoin accumulation company that operates large-scale mining facilities while also strategically purchasing Bitcoin on the open market. It generates revenue primarily from Bitcoin mining rewards—which account for the majority of its income—supplemented by opportunistic trading gains from its strategic Bitcoin purchases. The company's competitive advantage lies in its dual accumulation strategy that combines low-cost mining operations with market-timing purchases, allowing it to maximize Bitcoin holdings per share.
TeraWulf is a bitcoin mining company that develops, owns, and operates large-scale mining facilities in the United States. It generates revenue primarily from bitcoin mining rewards — converting electricity into digital assets — with additional income from hosting services for other miners. The company's competitive advantage lies in its access to low-cost, sustainable energy sources — particularly nuclear and hydroelectric power — which gives it superior mining economics.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
ABTC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Valuation Metrics). WULF leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
WULF is the larger business by revenue, generating $140M annually — 2.0x ABTC's $72M. ABTC is the more profitable business, keeping 6.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WULF's -51.7%.
| Metric | ABTCAmerican Bitcoin … | WULFTeraWulf Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $72M | $140M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$111M | -$72M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$102M | -$564M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$85M | -$677M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.8% | +55.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | -54.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | -51.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -125.4% | -2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -17.7% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ABTCAmerican Bitcoin … | WULFTeraWulf Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $199M | $7.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $205M | $7.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2.17x | -77.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 68.00x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 0.40x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.79x | 50.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.91x | 23.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ABTC delivers a -17.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-18 in annual profit, vs $-2 for WULF. ABTC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WULF's 2.01x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ABTC scores 5/9 vs WULF's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ABTCAmerican Bitcoin … | WULFTeraWulf Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -17.7% | -2.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.8% | -23.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +47.2% | -10.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +61.6% | -15.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 2.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5M | $217M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $0 | $274M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $491M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -6641.25x | -27.06x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in WULF five years ago would be worth $21,413 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for ABTC. Over the past 12 months, WULF leads with a +287.1% total return vs ABTC's -26.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WULF at 193.7% vs ABTC's -77.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ABTCAmerican Bitcoin … | WULFTeraWulf Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -42.7% | +27.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.6% | +287.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.9% | +2434.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +114.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +77.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -77.6% | +193.7% |
Risk & Volatility
ABTC is the less volatile stock with a 2.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WULF's 2.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WULF currently trades 87.6% from its 52-week high vs ABTC's 7.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ABTCAmerican Bitcoin … | WULFTeraWulf Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.15x | 2.58x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.65 | $18.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.63 | $2.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +7.0% | +87.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 33.3 | 64.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10.2M | 24.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Consensus price targets imply 292.2% upside for ABTC (target: $4) vs 38.7% for WULF (target: $23).
| Metric | ABTCAmerican Bitcoin … | WULFTeraWulf Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $4.00 | $22.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.7% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Bitcoin Co… (ABTC) | 100 | 0.01 | -100.0% |
| TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) | 100 | 257.97 | +158.0% |
TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) returned +114% over 5 years vs American Bitcoin Co… (ABTC)'s -100%. A $10,000 investment in WULF 5 years ago would be worth $21,413 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Bitcoin Co… (ABTC) | $16M | $72M | +357.1% |
| TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) | $18M | $140M | +697.5% |
TeraWulf Inc.'s revenue grew from $18M (2015) to $140M (2024) — a 25.9% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Bitcoin Co… (ABTC) | -2.2% | 6.0% | +376.7% |
| TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) | 0.8% | -51.7% | -6826.7% |
TeraWulf Inc.'s net margin went from 1% (2015) to -52% (2024).
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Bitcoin Co… (ABTC) | -4,226.74 | 0.47 | +100.0% |
| TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) | 0.07 | -0.21 | -413.9% |
TeraWulf Inc.'s EPS grew from $0.07 (2015) to $-0.21 (2024) — a NaN% CAGR.
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
American Bitcoin Corp generated $-90M FCF in 2024 (-993% vs 2021). TeraWulf Inc. generated $-292M FCF in 2024 (-120% vs 2021).
ABTC vs WULF: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ABTC or WULF a better buy right now?
American Bitcoin Corp (ABTC) offers the better valuation at 2.2x trailing P/E (68.0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ABTC or WULF?
Over the past 5 years, TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) delivered a total return of +114.1%, compared to -100.0% for American Bitcoin Corp (ABTC). A $10,000 investment in WULF five years ago would be worth approximately $21K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WULF returned +77.6% versus ABTC's -100.0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ABTC or WULF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Bitcoin Corp (ABTC) is the lower-risk stock at 2.15β versus TeraWulf Inc.'s 2.58β — meaning WULF is approximately 20% more volatile than ABTC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, American Bitcoin Corp (ABTC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for TeraWulf Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — ABTC or WULF?
American Bitcoin Corp (ABTC) is the more profitable company, earning 599.6% net margin versus -51.7% for TeraWulf Inc. — meaning it keeps 599.6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABTC leads at 676.7% versus -54.4% for WULF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WULF leads at 55.3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Is ABTC or WULF more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ABTC: 292.2% to $4.00.
06Which pays a better dividend — ABTC or WULF?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is ABTC or WULF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. American Bitcoin Corp (ABTC) carries a higher beta of 2.15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WULF: +77.6%, ABTC: -100.0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ABTC and WULF?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: ABTC is a small-cap deep-value stock; WULF is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.