Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Thunder Power Holdings, Inc. (AIEV) vs VinFast Auto Ltd. (VFS) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Stability / Safety | AIEV | Beta 0.38 vs VFS's 0.79 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | VFS | -9.9% vs AIEV's -40.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AIEV | -12.7% ROA vs VFS's -50.4% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Thunder Power Holdings is an electric vehicle manufacturer that develops and produces a range of EVs including sedans, SUVs, and compact city cars. It generates revenue primarily through vehicle sales—with its long-range sedan and SUV models likely representing the bulk of sales—and potentially through future service or charging offerings. The company's competitive advantage lies in its focus on long-range battery technology and its diverse product portfolio targeting multiple vehicle segments.
VinFast is a Vietnamese electric vehicle manufacturer that designs and produces EVs, e-scooters, and e-buses primarily for the Vietnamese market with expansion into North America. It generates revenue through vehicle sales—with cars being the dominant segment—alongside battery leasing and charging services for its products. The company benefits from being part of Vietnam's largest conglomerate, Vingroup, which provides capital and local market advantages.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
AIEV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). VFS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
VFS and AIEV operate at a comparable scale, with $67.43T and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | AIEVThunder Power Hol… | VFSVinFast Auto Ltd. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $67.43T |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | -$55.31T |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | -$92.40T |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | -$58.50T |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | -53.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -98.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -137.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -86.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +46.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +44.4% | -80.1% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | AIEVThunder Power Hol… | VFSVinFast Auto Ltd. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $7.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $13.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.30x | -2.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 4.52x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | AIEVThunder Power Hol… | VFSVinFast Auto Ltd. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -32.7% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.7% | -50.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -78.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$49,161 | $143.09T |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $52,616 | $3.31T |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3,455 | $146.40T |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -3.52x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in VFS five years ago would be worth $3,120 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $178 for AIEV. Over the past 12 months, VFS leads with a -9.9% total return vs AIEV's -40.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VFS at -32.2% vs AIEV's -73.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | AIEVThunder Power Hol… | VFSVinFast Auto Ltd. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -31.0% | -3.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -40.8% | -9.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.2% | -68.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.2% | -68.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.2% | -68.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -73.9% | -32.2% |
Risk & Volatility
AIEV is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VFS's 0.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VFS currently trades 85.3% from its 52-week high vs AIEV's 37.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | AIEVThunder Power Hol… | VFSVinFast Auto Ltd. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.38x | 0.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.37 | $3.82 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.01 | $2.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +37.3% | +85.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.5 | 46.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 18K | 252K |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | AIEVThunder Power Hol… | VFSVinFast Auto Ltd. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $6.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Jun 24 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thunder Power Holdi… (AIEV) | 100 | 1.55 | -98.5% |
| VinFast Auto Ltd. (VFS) | 100 | 79.33 | -20.7% |
VinFast Auto Ltd. (VFS) returned -69% over 5 years vs Thunder Power Holdi… (AIEV)'s -98%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2020 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thunder Power Holdi… (AIEV) | $0.00 | $0.00 | — |
| VinFast Auto Ltd. (VFS) | $13.7T | $44.0T | +221.5% |
VinFast Auto Ltd.'s revenue grew from $13.7T (2020) to $44.0T (2024) — a 33.9% CAGR.
Chart 3EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2020 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thunder Power Holdi… (AIEV) | -0.02 | -0.06 | -203.0% |
| VinFast Auto Ltd. (VFS) | -8,160.27 | -33,042 | -304.9% |
VinFast Auto Ltd.'s EPS grew from $-8160.27 (2020) to $-33042.00 (2024).
Chart 4Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Thunder Power Holdings, Inc. generated $-1M FCF in 2024 (-142% vs 2021). VinFast Auto Ltd. generated $-47.2T FCF in 2024 (-35% vs 2021).
AIEV vs VFS: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AIEV or VFS a better buy right now?
Analysts rate VinFast Auto Ltd. (VFS) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AIEV or VFS?
Over the past 5 years, VinFast Auto Ltd. (VFS) delivered a total return of -68.8%, compared to -98.2% for Thunder Power Holdings, Inc. (AIEV). A $10,000 investment in VFS five years ago would be worth approximately $3K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VFS returned -68.8% versus AIEV's -98.2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AIEV or VFS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Thunder Power Holdings, Inc. (AIEV) is the lower-risk stock at 0.38β versus VinFast Auto Ltd.'s 0.79β — meaning VFS is approximately 109% more volatile than AIEV relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — AIEV or VFS?
Thunder Power Holdings, Inc. (AIEV) is the more profitable company, earning 0.0% net margin versus -175.5% for VinFast Auto Ltd. — meaning it keeps 0.0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AIEV leads at 0.0% versus -125.9% for VFS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AIEV leads at 0.0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — AIEV or VFS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is AIEV or VFS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Thunder Power Holdings, Inc. (AIEV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.38)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AIEV: -98.2%, VFS: -68.8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between AIEV and VFS?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.