Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Senmiao Technology Limited (AIHS) vs Medallion Financial Corp. (MFIN) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MFIN | 14.6% revenue growth vs AIHS's -21.5% |
| Value | MFIN | Better valuation composite |
| Quality / Margins | MFIN | 12.3% net margin vs AIHS's -109.9% |
| Stability / Safety | AIHS | Beta 0.38 vs MFIN's 0.57 |
| Dividends | MFIN | 3.9% yield; 3-year raise streak; AIHS pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | MFIN | +25.3% vs AIHS's -85.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MFIN | 1.5% ROA vs AIHS's -63.1%, ROIC 6.8% vs -108.4% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Senmiao Technology operates an automobile transaction and financing platform in China, primarily serving online ride-hailing drivers. It generates revenue through car rental services, auto financing solutions — including financing leases — and supporting services for drivers. The company's key advantage is its integrated ecosystem that combines vehicle access, financing, and driver support services specifically tailored for China's ride-hailing market.
Medallion Financial is a specialty finance company that provides loans for recreational vehicles, home improvements, commercial businesses, and taxi medallions. It generates revenue primarily through interest income from its lending segments — recreation lending, home improvement lending, commercial lending, and medallion lending — with the recreation segment being its largest. The company's competitive advantage lies in its specialized expertise in niche lending markets where traditional banks are less active, particularly in taxi medallion financing where it has deep industry knowledge.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
MFIN leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Financial Metrics and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
MFIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $292M annually — 86.1x AIHS's $3M. MFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AIHS's -109.9%.
| Metric | AIHSSenmiao Technolog… | MFINMedallion Financi… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $292M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | $86M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $45M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$841,225 | $121M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.1% | +43.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -114.1% | +21.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -109.9% | +12.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | +39.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.2% | -13.5% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | AIHSSenmiao Technolog… | MFINMedallion Financi… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $298M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13M | $489M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.94x | 6.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.08x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.07x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.03x | 1.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.93x | 0.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 27.42x | 2.58x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MFIN delivers a 9.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-97 for AIHS. MFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.66x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AIHS's 1.07x.
| Metric | AIHSSenmiao Technolog… | MFINMedallion Financi… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -96.6% | +9.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -63.1% | +1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -108.4% | +6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -151.6% | +9.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.07x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$462,530 | $190M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $833,577 | $98M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $371,047 | $289M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -956.96x | 0.80x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in MFIN five years ago would be worth $16,112 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $83 for AIHS. Over the past 12 months, MFIN leads with a +25.3% total return vs AIHS's -85.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MFIN at 9.8% vs AIHS's -47.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | AIHSSenmiao Technolog… | MFINMedallion Financi… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.4% | -0.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -85.6% | +25.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.7% | +32.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | +61.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +50.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -47.7% | +9.8% |
Risk & Volatility
AIHS is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MFIN's 0.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MFIN currently trades 91.7% from its 52-week high vs AIHS's 7.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | AIHSSenmiao Technolog… | MFINMedallion Financi… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.38x | 0.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.00 | $11.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.83 | $7.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +7.6% | +91.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.6 | 47.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 23K | 35K |
Analyst Outlook
MFIN is the only dividend payer here at 3.94% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | AIHSSenmiao Technolog… | MFINMedallion Financi… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.5% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Senmiao Technology … (AIHS) | 100 | 2.26 | -97.7% |
| Medallion Financial… (MFIN) | 100 | 186.33 | +86.3% |
Medallion Financial… (MFIN) returned +61% over 5 years vs Senmiao Technology … (AIHS)'s -99%. A $10,000 investment in MFIN 5 years ago would be worth $16,112 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Senmiao Technology … (AIHS) | $0.00 | $3M | — |
| Medallion Financial… (MFIN) | $56M | $292M | +425.5% |
Senmiao Technology Limited's revenue grew from $0M (2015) to $3M (2024) — a 0.0% CAGR. Medallion Financial Corp.'s revenue grew from $56M (2015) to $292M (2024) — a 20.2% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Senmiao Technology … (AIHS) | -8.0% | -109.9% | -1269.4% |
| Medallion Financial… (MFIN) | 52.9% | 12.3% | -76.8% |
Medallion Financial Corp.'s net margin went from 53% (2015) to 12% (2024).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 6 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medallion Financial… (MFIN) | 353 | 6.2 | -98.2% |
Medallion Financial Corp. has traded in a 3x–353x P/E range over 6 years; current trailing P/E is ~7x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Senmiao Technology … (AIHS) | -0.01 | -0.33 | -5138.1% |
| Medallion Financial… (MFIN) | 1.2 | 1.52 | +26.7% |
Senmiao Technology Limited's EPS grew from $-0.01 (2015) to $-0.33 (2024). Medallion Financial Corp.'s EPS grew from $1.20 (2015) to $1.52 (2024) — a 3% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Senmiao Technology Limited generated $0M FCF in 2024 (+104% vs 2021). Medallion Financial Corp. generated $116M FCF in 2024 (+47% vs 2021).
AIHS vs MFIN: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AIHS or MFIN a better buy right now?
Medallion Financial Corp. (MFIN) offers the better valuation at 6.6x trailing P/E (7.1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Medallion Financial Corp. (MFIN) a "Hold" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AIHS or MFIN?
Over the past 5 years, Medallion Financial Corp. (MFIN) delivered a total return of +61.1%, compared to -99.2% for Senmiao Technology Limited (AIHS). A $10,000 investment in MFIN five years ago would be worth approximately $16K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MFIN returned +50.0% versus AIHS's -99.8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AIHS or MFIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Senmiao Technology Limited (AIHS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.38β versus Medallion Financial Corp.'s 0.57β — meaning MFIN is approximately 50% more volatile than AIHS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Medallion Financial Corp. (MFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 66% versus 107% for Senmiao Technology Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — AIHS or MFIN?
Medallion Financial Corp. (MFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 12.3% net margin versus -109.9% for Senmiao Technology Limited — meaning it keeps 12.3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MFIN leads at 21.6% versus -114.1% for AIHS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MFIN leads at 43.6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — AIHS or MFIN?
In this comparison, MFIN (3.9% yield) pays a dividend. AIHS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is AIHS or MFIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Medallion Financial Corp. (MFIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.57), 3.9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MFIN: +50.0%, AIHS: -99.8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between AIHS and MFIN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: AIHS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MFIN is a small-cap deep-value stock. MFIN pays a dividend while AIHS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.