Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Allot Ltd. (ALLT) vs CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CRWD | 29.4% revenue growth vs ALLT's 10.6% |
| Value | ALLT | Lower P/E (20.2x vs 100.2x) |
| Quality / Margins | ALLT | 3.6% net margin vs CRWD's -6.9% |
| Stability / Safety | CRWD | Beta 1.49 vs ALLT's 1.72 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | ALLT | +7.1% vs CRWD's -4.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ALLT | 2.1% ROA vs CRWD's -3.2% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Allot Ltd. is a cybersecurity company that provides network intelligence and security solutions primarily to telecom carriers and service providers. It generates revenue through software licensing and subscription services for its security platforms — which include network protection, DDoS mitigation, and endpoint security solutions — sold to communication service providers globally. The company's key advantage is its deep integration with carrier networks, enabling real-time traffic analysis and security enforcement at the network level rather than just at endpoints.
CrowdStrike is a cybersecurity company that provides cloud-native endpoint protection and threat intelligence through its Falcon platform. It generates revenue primarily from subscription fees for its security software modules — with cloud security, identity protection, and threat intelligence being key offerings — and managed security services. The company's competitive advantage lies in its AI-powered threat graph that analyzes trillions of security events weekly, creating a powerful network effect where each customer improves protection for all others.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
CRWD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Total Returns). ALLT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
CRWD is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.6B annually — 44.8x ALLT's $102M. ALLT is the more profitable business, keeping 3.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRWD's -6.9%. On growth, CRWD holds the edge at +22.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ALLTAllot Ltd. | CRWDCrowdStrike Holdi… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $102M | $4.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8M | -$150M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | -$314M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $16M | $1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.3% | +74.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | -7.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | -6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.1% | +25.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.0% | +22.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ALLT's 31.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CRWD's 964.8x.
| Metric | ALLTAllot Ltd. | CRWDCrowdStrike Holdi… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $251M | $93.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $241M | $90.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 79.05x | -4726.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.24x | 100.16x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 31.51x | 964.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.46x | 23.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.58x | 27.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.17x | 87.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALLT delivers a 3.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-8 for CRWD. ALLT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRWD's 0.24x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALLT scores 7/9 vs CRWD's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ALLTAllot Ltd. | CRWDCrowdStrike Holdi… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.3% | -7.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.1% | -3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.9% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.1% | -2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$10M | -$3.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $21M | $4.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $789M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -7.52x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in CRWD five years ago would be worth $16,651 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,985 for ALLT. Over the past 12 months, ALLT leads with a +7.1% total return vs CRWD's -4.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CRWD at 45.5% vs ALLT's 28.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ALLTAllot Ltd. | CRWDCrowdStrike Holdi… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -34.4% | -18.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.1% | -4.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +111.3% | +208.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -60.2% | +66.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.3% | +541.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.3% | +45.5% |
Risk & Volatility
CRWD is the less volatile stock with a 1.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ALLT's 1.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CRWD currently trades 65.6% from its 52-week high vs ALLT's 53.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ALLTAllot Ltd. | CRWDCrowdStrike Holdi… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.72x | 1.49x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.92 | $566.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.37 | $298.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.2% | +65.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 24.9 | 40.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 313K | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ALLT as "Buy" and CRWD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 122.9% upside for ALLT (target: $14) vs 42.9% for CRWD (target: $532).
| Metric | ALLTAllot Ltd. | CRWDCrowdStrike Holdi… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.13 | $531.69 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 63 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allot Ltd. (ALLT) | 100 | 91.58 | -8.4% |
| CrowdStrike Holding… (CRWD) | 100 | 742.18 | +642.2% |
CrowdStrike Holding… (CRWD) returned +67% over 5 years vs Allot Ltd. (ALLT)'s -60%. A $10,000 investment in CRWD 5 years ago would be worth $16,651 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allot Ltd. (ALLT) | $90M | $102M | +12.9% |
| CrowdStrike Holding… (CRWD) | $53M | $4.0B | +7395.7% |
Allot Ltd.'s revenue grew from $90M (2016) to $102M (2025) — a 1.4% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allot Ltd. (ALLT) | -8.8% | 3.6% | +141.1% |
| CrowdStrike Holding… (CRWD) | -173.2% | -0.5% | +99.7% |
Allot Ltd.'s net margin went from -9% (2016) to 4% (2025).
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allot Ltd. (ALLT) | -0.24 | 0.08 | +133.4% |
| CrowdStrike Holding… (CRWD) | -0.53 | -0.08 | +85.2% |
Allot Ltd.'s EPS grew from $-0.24 (2016) to $0.08 (2025).
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Allot Ltd. generated $15M FCF in 2025 (+197% vs 2021). CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. generated $1B FCF in 2025 (+265% vs 2021).
ALLT vs CRWD: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALLT or CRWD a better buy right now?
Allot Ltd. (ALLT) offers the better valuation at 79.1x trailing P/E (20.2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Allot Ltd. (ALLT) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALLT or CRWD?
On forward P/E, Allot Ltd. is actually cheaper at 20.2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALLT or CRWD?
Over the past 5 years, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) delivered a total return of +66.5%, compared to -60.2% for Allot Ltd. (ALLT). A $10,000 investment in CRWD five years ago would be worth approximately $17K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRWD returned +541.3% versus ALLT's +40.3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALLT or CRWD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) is the lower-risk stock at 1.49β versus Allot Ltd.'s 1.72β — meaning ALLT is approximately 16% more volatile than CRWD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Allot Ltd. (ALLT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 24% for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — ALLT or CRWD?
Allot Ltd. (ALLT) is the more profitable company, earning 3.6% net margin versus -0.5% for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3.6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALLT leads at 3.5% versus -3.0% for CRWD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRWD leads at 74.9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ALLT or CRWD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Allot Ltd. (ALLT) trades at 20.2x forward P/E versus 100.2x for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. — 79.9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALLT: 122.9% to $14.13.
07Which pays a better dividend — ALLT or CRWD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is ALLT or CRWD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+541.3% 10Y return). Allot Ltd. (ALLT) carries a higher beta of 1.72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CRWD: +541.3%, ALLT: +40.3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ALLT and CRWD?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.