Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Allot Ltd. (ALLT) vs CyberArk Software Ltd. (CYBR) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CYBR | 36.0% revenue growth vs ALLT's 10.6% |
| Value | ALLT | Lower P/E (20.2x vs 81.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | ALLT | 3.6% net margin vs CYBR's -10.8% |
| Stability / Safety | CYBR | Beta 1.05 vs ALLT's 1.72 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | CYBR | +12.4% vs ALLT's +7.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ALLT | 2.1% ROA vs CYBR's -3.0%, ROIC 2.9% vs -3.2% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Allot Ltd. is a cybersecurity company that provides network intelligence and security solutions primarily to telecom carriers and service providers. It generates revenue through software licensing and subscription services for its security platforms — which include network protection, DDoS mitigation, and endpoint security solutions — sold to communication service providers globally. The company's key advantage is its deep integration with carrier networks, enabling real-time traffic analysis and security enforcement at the network level rather than just at endpoints.
CyberArk is a cybersecurity company specializing in privileged access management — protecting organizations' most critical accounts and credentials from cyberattacks. It generates revenue primarily through software license sales and subscription services — including SaaS offerings — with maintenance and professional services contributing additional recurring income. The company's competitive advantage lies in its deep specialization in the privileged access security niche, where it has established market leadership and a comprehensive platform that's difficult for competitors to replicate.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
CYBR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Total Returns). ALLT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
CYBR is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 13.3x ALLT's $102M. ALLT is the more profitable business, keeping 3.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CYBR's -10.8%. On growth, CYBR holds the edge at +18.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ALLTAllot Ltd. | CYBRCyberArk Software… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $102M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8M | $23M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | -$147M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $16M | $259M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.3% | +74.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | -7.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | -10.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.1% | +19.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.0% | +18.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +83.2% |
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ALLT's 31.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CYBR's 908.2x.
| Metric | ALLTAllot Ltd. | CYBRCyberArk Software… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $251M | $20.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $241M | $21.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 79.05x | -139.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.24x | 81.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 31.51x | 908.21x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.46x | 15.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.58x | 8.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.17x | 79.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALLT delivers a 3.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-6 for CYBR. ALLT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CYBR's 0.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALLT scores 7/9 vs CYBR's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ALLTAllot Ltd. | CYBRCyberArk Software… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.3% | -6.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.1% | -3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.9% | -3.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.1% | -3.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$10M | $599M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $21M | $623M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in CYBR five years ago would be worth $26,916 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,985 for ALLT. Over the past 12 months, CYBR leads with a +12.4% total return vs ALLT's +7.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CYBR at 41.3% vs ALLT's 28.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ALLTAllot Ltd. | CYBRCyberArk Software… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -34.4% | -6.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.1% | +12.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +111.3% | +182.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -60.2% | +169.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.3% | +991.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.3% | +41.3% |
Risk & Volatility
CYBR is the less volatile stock with a 1.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ALLT's 1.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CYBR currently trades 77.7% from its 52-week high vs ALLT's 53.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ALLTAllot Ltd. | CYBRCyberArk Software… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.72x | 1.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.92 | $526.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.37 | $288.63 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.2% | +77.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 24.9 | 38.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 313K | 810K |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ALLT as "Buy" and CYBR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 122.9% upside for ALLT (target: $14) vs 14.0% for CYBR (target: $466).
| Metric | ALLTAllot Ltd. | CYBRCyberArk Software… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.13 | $466.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 49 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allot Ltd. (ALLT) | 100 | 91.58 | -8.4% |
| CyberArk Software L… (CYBR) | 100 | 399.88 | +299.9% |
CyberArk Software L… (CYBR) returned +169% over 5 years vs Allot Ltd. (ALLT)'s -60%. A $10,000 investment in CYBR 5 years ago would be worth $26,916 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allot Ltd. (ALLT) | $90M | $102M | +12.9% |
| CyberArk Software L… (CYBR) | $217M | $1.4B | +528.4% |
Allot Ltd.'s revenue grew from $90M (2016) to $102M (2025) — a 1.4% CAGR. CyberArk Software Ltd.'s revenue grew from $217M (2016) to $1.4B (2025) — a 22.7% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allot Ltd. (ALLT) | -8.8% | 3.6% | +141.1% |
| CyberArk Software L… (CYBR) | 13.0% | -10.8% | -183.1% |
Allot Ltd.'s net margin went from -9% (2016) to 4% (2025). CyberArk Software Ltd.'s net margin went from 13% (2016) to -11% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 3 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2019 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| CyberArk Software L… (CYBR) | 94.1 | 72 | -23.5% |
CyberArk Software Ltd. has traded in a 58x–94x P/E range over 3 years; current trailing P/E is ~-140x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allot Ltd. (ALLT) | -0.24 | 0.08 | +133.4% |
| CyberArk Software L… (CYBR) | 0.78 | -2.93 | -475.6% |
Allot Ltd.'s EPS grew from $-0.24 (2016) to $0.08 (2025). CyberArk Software Ltd.'s EPS grew from $0.78 (2016) to $-2.93 (2025) — a NaN% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Allot Ltd. generated $15M FCF in 2025 (+197% vs 2021). CyberArk Software Ltd. generated $259M FCF in 2025 (+294% vs 2021).
ALLT vs CYBR: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALLT or CYBR a better buy right now?
Allot Ltd. (ALLT) offers the better valuation at 79.1x trailing P/E (20.2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Allot Ltd. (ALLT) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALLT or CYBR?
On forward P/E, Allot Ltd. is actually cheaper at 20.2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALLT or CYBR?
Over the past 5 years, CyberArk Software Ltd. (CYBR) delivered a total return of +169.2%, compared to -60.2% for Allot Ltd. (ALLT). A $10,000 investment in CYBR five years ago would be worth approximately $27K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CYBR returned +991.1% versus ALLT's +40.3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALLT or CYBR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CyberArk Software Ltd. (CYBR) is the lower-risk stock at 1.05β versus Allot Ltd.'s 1.72β — meaning ALLT is approximately 65% more volatile than CYBR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Allot Ltd. (ALLT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 51% for CyberArk Software Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — ALLT or CYBR?
Allot Ltd. (ALLT) is the more profitable company, earning 3.6% net margin versus -10.8% for CyberArk Software Ltd. — meaning it keeps 3.6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALLT leads at 3.5% versus -7.7% for CYBR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CYBR leads at 74.3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ALLT or CYBR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Allot Ltd. (ALLT) trades at 20.2x forward P/E versus 81.9x for CyberArk Software Ltd. — 61.6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALLT: 122.9% to $14.13.
07Which pays a better dividend — ALLT or CYBR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is ALLT or CYBR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CyberArk Software Ltd. (CYBR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.05), +991.1% 10Y return). Allot Ltd. (ALLT) carries a higher beta of 1.72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CYBR: +991.1%, ALLT: +40.3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ALLT and CYBR?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.