Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. (AMOD) vs DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. (DV) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Value | AMOD | Lower P/E (0.7x vs 20.2x) |
| Stability / Safety | AMOD | Beta 0.60 vs DV's 1.00 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | DV | -24.2% vs AMOD's -75.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | DV | 3.7% ROA vs AMOD's -18.2% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Alpha Modus Holdings develops data-driven technologies that enhance in-store digital experiences for consumers at the point of purchase decision. It generates revenue primarily through technology licensing and patent monetization — including its 571-patent portfolio — with additional income from software development services. The company's key advantage lies in its extensive intellectual property portfolio covering retail technology, which creates barriers to entry for competitors.
DoubleVerify is a digital media measurement and analytics platform that helps advertisers verify the quality and effectiveness of their online advertising. It generates revenue primarily through subscription fees for its verification services — including fraud detection, brand safety, viewability, and contextual targeting solutions — with most revenue coming from advertisers and agencies. The company's key advantage is its independent, third-party verification status which creates trust and objectivity in an industry plagued by fraud and opaque metrics.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
DV leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). AMOD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
DV and AMOD operate at a comparable scale, with $748M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | AMODAlpha Modus Holdi… | DVDoubleVerify Hold… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $748M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | $136M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | $51M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $173M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +82.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +10.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +6.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +23.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +7.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -176.2% | +28.6% |
Valuation Metrics
At 0.7x trailing earnings, AMOD trades at a 98% valuation discount to DV's 35.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMOD's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DV's 11.4x.
| Metric | AMODAlpha Modus Holdi… | DVDoubleVerify Hold… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $24M | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $28M | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.69x | 35.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.19x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.93x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.57x | 11.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | AMODAlpha Modus Holdi… | DVDoubleVerify Hold… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +4.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -18.2% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +6.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | -$159M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $735,814 | $259M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $100M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.09x | 26.89x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in DV five years ago would be worth $2,928 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $484 for AMOD. Over the past 12 months, DV leads with a -24.2% total return vs AMOD's -75.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DV at -26.2% vs AMOD's -63.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | AMODAlpha Modus Holdi… | DVDoubleVerify Hold… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.5% | -2.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -75.4% | -24.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.2% | -59.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.2% | -70.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.2% | -69.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -63.6% | -26.2% |
Risk & Volatility
AMOD is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DV's 1.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DV currently trades 61.7% from its 52-week high vs AMOD's 19.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | AMODAlpha Modus Holdi… | DVDoubleVerify Hold… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.60x | 1.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.60 | $17.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.40 | $7.64 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +19.3% | +61.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.6 | 43.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.8M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | AMODAlpha Modus Holdi… | DVDoubleVerify Hold… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $14.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Dec 24 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpha Modus Holding… (AMOD) | 100 | 8.83 | -91.2% |
| DoubleVerify Holdin… (DV) | 100 | 55.04 | -45.0% |
DoubleVerify Holdin… (DV) returned -71% over 5 years vs Alpha Modus Holding… (AMOD)'s -95%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpha Modus Holding… (AMOD) | $0.00 | $0.00 | — |
| DoubleVerify Holdin… (DV) | $104M | $748M | +617.4% |
DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc.'s revenue grew from $104M (2018) to $748M (2025) — a 32.5% CAGR.
Chart 3P/E Ratio History — 5 Years
| Stock | 2021 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| DoubleVerify Holdin… (DV) | 184.9 | 38.1 | -79.4% |
DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. has traded in a 38x–185x P/E range over 5 years; current trailing P/E is ~35x.
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpha Modus Holding… (AMOD) | 0.03 | 0.73 | +2167.1% |
| DoubleVerify Holdin… (DV) | 0.02 | 0.3 | +1363.4% |
DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc.'s EPS grew from $0.02 (2018) to $0.30 (2025) — a 47% CAGR.
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. generated $-2M FCF in 2024 (-36% vs 2021). DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. generated $173M FCF in 2025 (+135% vs 2021).
AMOD vs DV: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMOD or DV a better buy right now?
Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. (AMOD) offers the better valuation at 0.7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. (DV) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMOD or DV?
On trailing P/E, Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. (AMOD) is the cheapest at 0.7x versus DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. at 35.1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMOD or DV?
Over the past 5 years, DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. (DV) delivered a total return of -70.7%, compared to -95.2% for Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. (AMOD). A $10,000 investment in DV five years ago would be worth approximately $3K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DV returned -69.7% versus AMOD's -95.2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMOD or DV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. (AMOD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.60β versus DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc.'s 1.00β — meaning DV is approximately 66% more volatile than AMOD relative to the S&P 500.
05Which has better profit margins — AMOD or DV?
DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. (DV) is the more profitable company, earning 6.8% net margin versus 0.0% for Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6.8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DV leads at 10.6% versus 0.0% for AMOD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DV leads at 82.2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — AMOD or DV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is AMOD or DV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. (AMOD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.60)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMOD: -95.2%, DV: -69.7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between AMOD and DV?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: AMOD is a small-cap deep-value stock; DV is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.