Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Antero Resources Corporation (AR) vs CNX Resources Corporation (CNX) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CNX | 59.2% revenue growth vs AR's 28.1% |
| Value | AR | Lower P/E (11.3x vs 16.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | CNX | 28.0% net margin vs AR's 11.1% |
| Stability / Safety | CNX | Beta 0.41 vs AR's 1.02 |
| Dividends | AR | 1.1% yield; 2-year raise streak; CNX pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | CNX | +44.6% vs AR's +0.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CNX | 7.0% ROA vs AR's 4.2%, ROIC 9.1% vs 5.9% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Antero Resources is an independent natural gas and natural gas liquids producer focused on the Appalachian Basin. It generates revenue primarily from natural gas sales (~60% of revenue), natural gas liquids sales (~35%), and oil sales (~5%), with its production heavily weighted toward liquids-rich gas. The company's competitive advantage lies in its massive, contiguous acreage position in the Marcellus and Utica shale plays — which provides operational efficiency and significant low-cost reserves.
CNX Resources is an Appalachian Basin-focused natural gas producer that explores, develops, and operates gas properties primarily in the Marcellus and Utica shale formations. It generates revenue through natural gas sales to wholesalers—with additional income from midstream gathering operations—while its extensive acreage position across multiple states provides a low-cost production base. The company's competitive advantage lies in its massive, contiguous acreage holdings in the prolific Appalachian Basin, which enables efficient development and long-term reserve life.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
CNX leads in 4 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). AR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
AR is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.9B annually — 2.2x CNX's $2.3B. CNX is the more profitable business, keeping 28.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AR's 11.1%. On growth, CNX holds the edge at +100.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ARAntero Resources … | CNXCNX Resources Cor… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.9B | $2.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.4B | $1.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $548M | $633M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.3B | $534M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +72.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +51.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.1% | +28.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +26.6% | +23.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.4% | +100.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.7% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
At 10.5x trailing earnings, CNX trades at a 42% valuation discount to AR's 18.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CNX's 6.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AR's 9.1x.
| Metric | ARAntero Resources … | CNXCNX Resources Cor… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11.4B | $5.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14.9B | $8.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.13x | 10.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.26x | 15.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.11x | 6.14x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.15x | 2.78x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.49x | 1.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.96x | 11.14x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CNX delivers a 14.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $7 for AR. AR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.46x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNX's 0.57x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AR scores 9/9 vs CNX's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ARAntero Resources … | CNXCNX Resources Cor… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.3% | +14.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.2% | +7.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.9% | +9.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.6% | +10.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 0.57x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.5B | $2.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | — | $779,000 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.5B | $2.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.97x | 5.40x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in AR five years ago would be worth $37,561 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $31,724 for CNX. Over the past 12 months, CNX leads with a +44.6% total return vs AR's +0.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CNX at 39.6% vs AR's 12.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ARAntero Resources … | CNXCNX Resources Cor… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.6% | +14.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.3% | +44.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.5% | +172.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +275.6% | +217.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.5% | +384.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.0% | +39.6% |
Risk & Volatility
CNX is the less volatile stock with a 0.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AR's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CNX currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs AR's 83.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ARAntero Resources … | CNXCNX Resources Cor… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.02x | 0.41x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.02 | $42.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.10 | $27.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.6% | +99.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.5 | 54.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.0M | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AR as "Buy" and CNX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 20.2% upside for AR (target: $44) vs -5.3% for CNX (target: $40). AR is the only dividend payer here at 1.09% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ARAntero Resources … | CNXCNX Resources Cor… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $44.25 | $39.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 50 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.40 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | +8.8% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antero Resources Co… (AR) | 100 | 2,285.71 | +2185.7% |
| CNX Resources Corpo… (CNX) | 100 | 698.32 | +598.3% |
Antero Resources Co… (AR) returned +276% over 5 years vs CNX Resources Corpo… (CNX)'s +217%. A $10,000 investment in AR 5 years ago would be worth $37,561 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antero Resources Co… (AR) | $1.8B | $5.3B | +200.6% |
| CNX Resources Corpo… (CNX) | $848M | $2.1B | +152.7% |
Antero Resources Corporation's revenue grew from $1.8B (2016) to $5.3B (2025) — a 13.0% CAGR. CNX Resources Corporation's revenue grew from $848M (2016) to $2.1B (2025) — a 10.8% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antero Resources Co… (AR) | -48.4% | 12.0% | +124.9% |
| CNX Resources Corpo… (CNX) | -100.0% | 29.6% | +129.5% |
Antero Resources Corporation's net margin went from -48% (2016) to 12% (2025). CNX Resources Corporation's net margin went from -100% (2016) to 30% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 7 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antero Resources Co… (AR) | 9.8 | 17 | +73.5% |
| CNX Resources Corpo… (CNX) | 8.9 | 9.2 | +3.4% |
Antero Resources Corporation has traded in a 5x–195x P/E range over 5 years; current trailing P/E is ~18x. CNX Resources Corporation has traded in a 2x–52x P/E range over 5 years; current trailing P/E is ~10x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antero Resources Co… (AR) | -2.88 | 2.03 | +170.5% |
| CNX Resources Corpo… (CNX) | -3.7 | 3.98 | +207.6% |
Antero Resources Corporation's EPS grew from $-2.88 (2016) to $2.03 (2025). CNX Resources Corporation's EPS grew from $-3.70 (2016) to $3.98 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Antero Resources Corporation generated $2B FCF in 2025 (+6% vs 2021). CNX Resources Corporation generated $534M FCF in 2025 (+16% vs 2021).
AR vs CNX: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AR or CNX a better buy right now?
CNX Resources Corporation (CNX) offers the better valuation at 10.5x trailing P/E (16.0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Antero Resources Corporation (AR) a "Buy" — based on 50 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AR or CNX?
On trailing P/E, CNX Resources Corporation (CNX) is the cheapest at 10.5x versus Antero Resources Corporation at 18.1x. On forward P/E, Antero Resources Corporation is actually cheaper at 11.3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AR or CNX?
Over the past 5 years, Antero Resources Corporation (AR) delivered a total return of +275.6%, compared to +217.2% for CNX Resources Corporation (CNX). A $10,000 investment in AR five years ago would be worth approximately $38K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CNX returned +384.1% versus AR's +63.5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AR or CNX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CNX Resources Corporation (CNX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.41β versus Antero Resources Corporation's 1.02β — meaning AR is approximately 146% more volatile than CNX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Antero Resources Corporation (AR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 46% versus 57% for CNX Resources Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — AR or CNX?
CNX Resources Corporation (CNX) is the more profitable company, earning 29.6% net margin versus 12.0% for Antero Resources Corporation — meaning it keeps 29.6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CNX leads at 37.1% versus 16.7% for AR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AR leads at 94.3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is AR or CNX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Antero Resources Corporation (AR) trades at 11.3x forward P/E versus 16.0x for CNX Resources Corporation — 4.7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AR: 20.2% to $44.25.
07Which pays a better dividend — AR or CNX?
In this comparison, AR (1.1% yield) pays a dividend. CNX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is AR or CNX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CNX Resources Corporation (CNX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.41), +384.1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNX: +384.1%, AR: +63.5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between AR and CNX?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: AR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CNX is a small-cap deep-value stock. AR pays a dividend while CNX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.