Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Aspire Biopharma Holdings, Inc. (ASBPW) vs Seer, Inc. (SEER) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Quality / Margins |  SEER | -486.0% net margin vs ASBPW's -16K% |
| Stability / Safety | SEER | Beta 0.52 vs ASBPW's 0.76 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | SEER | -9.3% vs ASBPW's -63.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SEER | -25.7% ROA vs ASBPW's -13.2% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
SEERbeta 0.52
Growth exposure
SEERRev growth -8.1%, EPS growth -3.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.7%
Long-term compounding (10Y)
ASBPW-74.2% 10Y total return vs SEER's -96.7%
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
SEERLower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 7.9%, current ratio 16.53x
Defensive / Recession hedge
SEERBeta 0.52, current ratio 16.53x
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Aspire Biopharma Holdings is a biotechnology company that develops advanced diagnostic solutions and molecular tests for disease detection. It generates revenue primarily through sales of its diagnostic assays and testing services to healthcare providers and research institutions. The company's competitive advantage lies in its proprietary genetic testing technology and specialized expertise in precision diagnostics.
Seer is a life sciences company that develops and commercializes proteomics technology to analyze proteins for research and drug discovery. It generates revenue primarily from sales of its Proteograph Product Suite — an integrated system of consumables, automation instruments, and software — to academic institutions, biopharma companies, and research laboratories. The company's competitive advantage lies in its proprietary technology platform that enables deep, unbiased proteomic analysis at scale, which could accelerate biomarker discovery and therapeutic development.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
SEER 4ASBPW 0SEER3/5 metricsSEER1/1 metricsSEER3/4 metricsSEER2/2 metricsSEER leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Financial Metrics and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
SEER is the larger business by revenue, generating $16M annually — 8411.1x ASBPW's $1,941. SEER is the more profitable business, keeping -4.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ASBPW's -16351.8%.
| Metric | ASBPWAspire Biopharma … | SEERSeer, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1,941 | $16M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$28M | -$76M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$32M | -$79M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | -$46M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.5% | +40.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -10314.0% | -5.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -16351.8% | -4.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1811.5% | -2.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +46.0% | +8.6% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ASBPWAspire Biopharma … | SEERSeer, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $178,899 | $103M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1M | $88M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | -1.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 7.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SEER scores 4/9 vs ASBPW's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ASBPWAspire Biopharma … | SEERSeer, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -29.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -13.2% | -25.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -21.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -25.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1M | -$15M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3,633 | $41M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $26M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.51x | — |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in ASBPW five years ago would be worth $2,583 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $427 for SEER. Over the past 12 months, SEER leads with a -9.3% total return vs ASBPW's -63.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SEER at -28.2% vs ASBPW's -36.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ASBPWAspire Biopharma … | SEERSeer, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.7% | +1.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -63.8% | -9.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.2% | -62.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.2% | -95.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.2% | -96.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -36.3% | -28.2% |
Risk & Volatility
SEER is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASBPW's 0.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SEER currently trades 76.8% from its 52-week high vs ASBPW's 24.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ASBPWAspire Biopharma … | SEERSeer, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 0.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.09 | $2.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.01 | $1.62 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +24.1% | +76.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.0 | 42.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 41K | 239K |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ASBPWAspire Biopharma … | SEERSeer, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +11.4% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Feb 25 | Mar 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aspire Biopharma Ho… (ASBPW) | 100 | 28.81 | -71.2% |
| Seer, Inc. (SEER) | 100 | 83.98 | -16.0% |
Aspire Biopharma Ho… (ASBPW) returned -74% over 5 years vs Seer, Inc. (SEER)'s -96%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aspire Biopharma Ho… (ASBPW) | $0.00 | $0.00 | — |
| Seer, Inc. (SEER) | $0.00 | $14M | — |
Seer, Inc.'s revenue grew from $0M (2018) to $14M (2024) — a 0.0% CAGR.
Chart 3EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aspire Biopharma Ho… (ASBPW) | -0.07 | -1.52 | -1999.4% |
| Seer, Inc. (SEER) | -0.29 | -1.39 | -379.3% |
Seer, Inc.'s EPS grew from $-0.29 (2018) to $-1.39 (2024).
Chart 4Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Aspire Biopharma Holdings, Inc. generated $-0M FCF in 2024 (+95% vs 2022). Seer, Inc. generated $-50M FCF in 2024 (+7% vs 2021).
ASBPW vs SEER: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ASBPW or SEER a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Seer, Inc. (SEER) a "Hold" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ASBPW or SEER?
Over the past 5 years, Aspire Biopharma Holdings, Inc. (ASBPW) delivered a total return of -74.2%, compared to -95.7% for Seer, Inc. (SEER). A $10,000 investment in ASBPW five years ago would be worth approximately $3K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASBPW returned -74.2% versus SEER's -96.7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ASBPW or SEER?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Seer, Inc. (SEER) is the lower-risk stock at 0.52β versus Aspire Biopharma Holdings, Inc.'s 0.76β — meaning ASBPW is approximately 46% more volatile than SEER relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — ASBPW or SEER?
Seer, Inc. (SEER) is the more profitable company, earning -620.9% net margin versus -16351.8% for Aspire Biopharma Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps -620.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SEER leads at -717.7% versus -10314.0% for ASBPW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SEER leads at 49.0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — ASBPW or SEER?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is ASBPW or SEER better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Seer, Inc. (SEER) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.52)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SEER: -96.7%, ASBPW: -74.2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between ASBPW and SEER?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.