Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Cibus, Inc. (CBUS) vs Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 134.6% revenue growth vs LGND's 27.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.3% net margin vs CBUS's -31.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs CBUS's 1.89, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +82.1% vs LGND's +75.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.3% ROA vs CBUS's -36.0%, ROIC -2.3% vs -86.2% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Cibus is an agricultural technology company that develops and licenses proprietary plant traits to seed companies. It generates revenue primarily through royalty payments from seed sales — typically 5-15% of seed revenue — with additional income from upfront licensing fees and research collaborations. The company's moat lies in its proprietary gene-editing platform that enables rapid, precise trait development without introducing foreign DNA, giving it a technological edge over traditional breeding methods.
Ligand Pharmaceuticals is a biopharmaceutical company that develops and acquires drug discovery technologies and royalty-bearing assets for pharmaceutical partners. It generates revenue primarily through royalties from partnered drug sales — including blockbusters like Kyprolis and Veklury — supplemented by milestone payments and contract research services. Its key competitive advantage lies in its diversified portfolio of royalty streams and its Captisol drug formulation technology, which creates multiple revenue sources from single platform innovations.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
LGND leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Financial Metrics and Valuation Metrics.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
LGND is the larger business by revenue, generating $251M annually — 66.2x CBUS's $4M. LGND is the more profitable business, keeping 19.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CBUS's -31.3%. On growth, LGND holds the edge at +122.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $251M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$87M | $52M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$119M | $49M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$52M | $31M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.3% | +85.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -24.5% | +7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -31.3% | +19.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -13.6% | +12.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -63.1% | +122.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +94.2% | +15.6% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $106M | $4.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $128M | $3.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.33x | -918.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 23.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 309.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 24.84x | 23.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.85x | 4.45x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 51.32x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LGND delivers a 5.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-2 for CBUS. LGND carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CBUS's 0.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LGND scores 5/9 vs CBUS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.3% | +5.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -36.0% | +3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -86.2% | -2.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -60.6% | -2.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $22M | -$65M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $72M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $36M | $7M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.69x | 22.69x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in LGND five years ago would be worth $14,261 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $80 for CBUS. Over the past 12 months, CBUS leads with a +82.1% total return vs LGND's +75.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LGND at 41.4% vs CBUS's -45.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +89.9% | +6.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +82.1% | +75.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.6% | +182.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | +42.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | +102.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -45.2% | +41.4% |
Risk & Volatility
LGND is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CBUS's 1.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.89x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.80 | $212.49 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.09 | $93.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.9% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.7 | 58.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 299K | 172K |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CBUS as "Buy" and LGND as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 222.1% upside for CBUS (target: $12) vs 22.7% for LGND (target: $248).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.50 | $248.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Mar 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cibus, Inc. (CBUS) | 100 | 1.09 | -98.9% |
| Ligand Pharmaceutic… (LGND) | 100 | 187.33 | +87.3% |
Ligand Pharmaceutic… (LGND) returned +43% over 5 years vs Cibus, Inc. (CBUS)'s -99%. A $10,000 investment in LGND 5 years ago would be worth $14,261 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cibus, Inc. (CBUS) | $1M | $4M | +235.1% |
| Ligand Pharmaceutic… (LGND) | $72M | $167M | +132.4% |
Cibus, Inc.'s revenue grew from $1M (2015) to $4M (2024) — a 14.4% CAGR. Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated's revenue grew from $72M (2015) to $167M (2024) — a 9.8% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cibus, Inc. (CBUS) | -4.6% | -59.0% | -1174.0% |
| Ligand Pharmaceutic… (LGND) | 3.6% | -2.4% | -167.4% |
Cibus, Inc.'s net margin went from -5% (2015) to -59% (2024). Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated's net margin went from 4% (2015) to -2% (2024).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 5 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2023 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ligand Pharmaceutic… (LGND) | 258.4 | 24.3 | -90.6% |
Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated has traded in a 3x–258x P/E range over 5 years; current trailing P/E is ~-919x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cibus, Inc. (CBUS) | -11.07 | -10.83 | +2.2% |
| Ligand Pharmaceutic… (LGND) | 12.12 | -0.22 | -101.8% |
Cibus, Inc.'s EPS grew from $-11.07 (2015) to $-10.83 (2024). Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated's EPS grew from $12.12 (2015) to $-0.22 (2024) — a NaN% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Cibus, Inc. generated $-59M FCF in 2024 (-205% vs 2021). Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated generated $77M FCF in 2024 (+11% vs 2021).
CBUS vs LGND: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CBUS or LGND a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Cibus, Inc. (CBUS) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CBUS or LGND?
Over the past 5 years, Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) delivered a total return of +42.6%, compared to -99.2% for Cibus, Inc. (CBUS). A $10,000 investment in LGND five years ago would be worth approximately $14K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LGND returned +102.2% versus CBUS's -99.4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CBUS or LGND?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) is the lower-risk stock at 0.82β versus Cibus, Inc.'s 1.89β — meaning CBUS is approximately 131% more volatile than LGND relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 37% for Cibus, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — CBUS or LGND?
Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) is the more profitable company, earning -2.4% net margin versus -59.0% for Cibus, Inc. — meaning it keeps -2.4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LGND leads at -13.5% versus -60.6% for CBUS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CBUS leads at 100.0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Is CBUS or LGND more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CBUS: 222.1% to $11.50.
06Which pays a better dividend — CBUS or LGND?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is CBUS or LGND better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.82), +102.2% 10Y return). Cibus, Inc. (CBUS) carries a higher beta of 1.89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LGND: +102.2%, CBUS: -99.4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CBUS and LGND?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.