Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Cibus, Inc. (CBUS) vs Royalty Pharma plc (RPRX) vs Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) vs Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) vs BlackRock Technology and Private Equity Term Trust (BTX) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth |  CBUS | 134.6% revenue growth vs BTX's -81.1% |
| Value |  RPRX | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 11.3x) |
| Quality / Margins |  BTX | 87.7% net margin vs CBUS's -31.3% |
| Stability / Safety |  INVA | Beta 0.07 vs CBUS's 1.89 |
| Dividends | BTX | 13.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs RPRX's 1.4% |
| Momentum (1Y) | CBUS | +82.1% vs BTX's +7.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | INVA | 16.6% ROA vs CBUS's -36.0%, ROIC 16.8% vs -86.2% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
RPRXDividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.36, yield 1.4%
Growth exposure
INVARev growth 18.5%, EPS growth 8.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.7%
Long-term compounding (10Y)
LGND102.2% 10Y total return vs INVA's 85.1%
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
INVALower volatility, beta 0.07, current ratio 14.64x
Defensive / Recession hedge
INVABeta 0.07, current ratio 14.64x
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Cibus is an agricultural technology company that develops and licenses proprietary plant traits to seed companies. It generates revenue primarily through royalty payments from seed sales — typically 5-15% of seed revenue — with additional income from upfront licensing fees and research collaborations. The company's moat lies in its proprietary gene-editing platform that enables rapid, precise trait development without introducing foreign DNA, giving it a technological edge over traditional breeding methods.
Royalty Pharma is a specialized investment firm that acquires royalty interests in approved and development-stage biopharmaceutical products. It generates revenue primarily from royalty payments on approximately 35 marketed therapies — with its largest assets including cystic fibrosis drug Trikafta and HIV treatment Biktarvy — which provide predictable cash flows. The company's competitive advantage lies in its deep expertise in valuing complex biopharmaceutical royalties and its extensive industry relationships that provide access to proprietary deal flow.
Ligand Pharmaceuticals is a biopharmaceutical company that develops and acquires drug discovery technologies and royalty-bearing assets for pharmaceutical partners. It generates revenue primarily through royalties from partnered drug sales — including blockbusters like Kyprolis and Veklury — supplemented by milestone payments and contract research services. Its key competitive advantage lies in its diversified portfolio of royalty streams and its Captisol drug formulation technology, which creates multiple revenue sources from single platform innovations.
Innoviva is a biopharmaceutical company that develops and commercializes respiratory therapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. It generates revenue primarily through royalties and collaboration payments from its partnered respiratory drugs — including RELVAR/BREO ELLIPTA, ANORO ELLIPTA, and TRELEGY ELLIPTA — which are commercialized by GlaxoSmithKline. The company's key advantage lies in its long-term royalty streams from established respiratory products and its strategic partnership with a major pharmaceutical company for commercialization.
BlackRock Technology and Private Equity Term Trust is a closed-end investment fund that pools investor capital to invest primarily in mid- and small-capitalization growth companies in the technology and healthcare sectors. It generates returns through capital appreciation and dividend income from its equity portfolio, with performance tied to the success of its underlying investments. The fund's key advantage is BlackRock's extensive research capabilities and access to innovative companies that traditional investors might overlook.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 5 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
LGND 1INVA 1BTX 1CBUS 0RPRX 0BTX4/6 metricsINVA6/9 metricsLGND3/6 metricsBTX leads in 1 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics). INVA leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
RPRX is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.3B annually — 619.4x CBUS's $4M. BTX is the more profitable business, keeping 87.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CBUS's -31.3%. On growth, LGND holds the edge at +122.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CBUSCibus, Inc. | RPRXRoyalty Pharma plc | LGNDLigand Pharmaceut… | INVAInnoviva, Inc. | BTXBlackRock Technol… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $2.3B | $251M | $415M | $41M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$87M | $1.5B | $52M | $13M | — |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$119M | $765M | $49M | $271M | — |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$52M | $2.4B | $31M | $195M | — |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.3% | +100.0% | +85.9% | +78.9% | +100.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -24.5% | +65.2% | +7.0% | -4.0% | +87.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -31.3% | +32.6% | +19.3% | +65.4% | +87.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -13.6% | +102.4% | +12.2% | +46.9% | +6.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -63.1% | +7.9% | +122.8% | +28.6% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +94.2% | -44.8% | +15.6% | +7.1% | — |
Valuation Metrics
At 6.7x trailing earnings, INVA trades at a 83% valuation discount to BTX's 38.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, INVA's 5.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LGND's 309.3x.
| Metric | CBUSCibus, Inc. | RPRXRoyalty Pharma plc | LGNDLigand Pharmaceut… | INVAInnoviva, Inc. | BTXBlackRock Technol… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $106M | $7.1B | $4.0B | $1.7B | $765M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $128M | $15.4B | $3.9B | $1.1B | $765M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.33x | 26.55x | -918.58x | 6.74x | 38.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.72x | 23.80x | 11.30x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.65x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.89x | 309.27x | 5.44x | 21.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 24.84x | 2.98x | 23.77x | 3.91x | 18.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.85x | 2.73x | 4.45x | 1.61x | 0.79x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 2.85x | 51.32x | 8.48x | 2.76x |
Profitability & Efficiency
INVA delivers a 23.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-2 for CBUS. LGND carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RPRX's 0.91x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LGND scores 5/9 vs BTX's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | CBUSCibus, Inc. | RPRXRoyalty Pharma plc | LGNDLigand Pharmaceut… | INVAInnoviva, Inc. | BTXBlackRock Technol… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.3% | +8.0% | +5.1% | +23.1% | +1.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -36.0% | +4.0% | +3.3% | +16.6% | +1.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -86.2% | +6.7% | -2.3% | +16.8% | +1.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -60.6% | +8.7% | -2.7% | +12.4% | +1.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | 0.91x | 0.01x | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $22M | $8.3B | -$65M | -$551M | $0 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $619M | $72M | $551M | — |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $36M | $9.0B | $7M | $0 | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.69x | 5.66x | 22.69x | 11.03x | 2313.25x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in INVA five years ago would be worth $20,115 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $80 for CBUS. Over the past 12 months, CBUS leads with a +82.1% total return vs BTX's +7.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LGND at 41.4% vs CBUS's -45.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CBUSCibus, Inc. | RPRXRoyalty Pharma plc | LGNDLigand Pharmaceut… | INVAInnoviva, Inc. | BTXBlackRock Technol… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +89.9% | +22.2% | +6.3% | +12.0% | -0.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +82.1% | +44.5% | +75.3% | +26.6% | +7.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.6% | +41.7% | +182.6% | +101.9% | +17.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | +21.1% | +42.6% | +101.2% | -45.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | +16.3% | +102.2% | +85.1% | -45.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -45.2% | +12.3% | +41.4% | +26.4% | +5.5% |
Risk & Volatility
INVA is the less volatile stock with a 0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CBUS's 1.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RPRX currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs BTX's 87.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CBUSCibus, Inc. | RPRXRoyalty Pharma plc | LGNDLigand Pharmaceut… | INVAInnoviva, Inc. | BTXBlackRock Technol… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.89x | 0.36x | 0.82x | 0.07x | 1.16x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.80 | $47.34 | $212.49 | $25.00 | $7.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.09 | $29.66 | $93.58 | $16.52 | $5.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.9% | +99.8% | +95.1% | +89.0% | +87.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.7 | 75.1 | 58.9 | 59.8 | 47.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 299K | 3.0M | 172K | 577K | 791K |
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CBUS as "Buy", RPRX as "Buy", LGND as "Buy", INVA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 222.1% upside for CBUS (target: $12) vs 4.5% for RPRX (target: $49). For income investors, BTX offers the higher dividend yield at 13.05% vs RPRX's 1.42%.
| Metric | CBUSCibus, Inc. | RPRXRoyalty Pharma plc | LGNDLigand Pharmaceut… | INVAInnoviva, Inc. | BTXBlackRock Technol… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.50 | $49.40 | $248.00 | $32.50 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 11 | 16 | 10 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.4% | — | — | +13.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.67 | — | — | $0.86 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.3% | +12.1% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Apr 21 | Mar 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cibus, Inc. (CBUS) | 100 | 1.13 | -98.9% |
| Royalty Pharma plc (RPRX) | 100 | 109.88 | +9.9% |
| Ligand Pharmaceutic… (LGND) | 100 | 130.72 | +30.7% |
| Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) | 100 | 186.02 | +86.0% |
| BlackRock Technolog… (BTX) | 102.65 | 32.74 | -68.1% |
Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) returned +101% over 5 years vs Cibus, Inc. (CBUS)'s -99%. A $10,000 investment in INVA 5 years ago would be worth $20,115 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cibus, Inc. (CBUS) | $399000.00 | $4M | +968.2% |
| Royalty Pharma plc (RPRX) | $1.6B | $2.4B | +48.8% |
| Ligand Pharmaceutic… (LGND) | $109M | $167M | +53.4% |
| Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) | $134M | $425M | +218.3% |
| BlackRock Technolog… (BTX) | $-640M | $41M | +106.4% |
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cibus, Inc. (CBUS) | -30.3% | -59.0% | -94.7% |
| Royalty Pharma plc (RPRX) | 75.7% | 32.4% | -57.2% |
| Ligand Pharmaceutic… (LGND) | -1.5% | -2.4% | -60.7% |
| Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) | 44.6% | 63.8% | +43.1% |
| BlackRock Technolog… (BTX) | 100.1% | 87.7% | -12.4% |
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Royalty Pharma plc (RPRX) | 19.3 | 21.7 | +12.4% |
| Ligand Pharmaceutic… (LGND) | 258.4 | 24.3 | -90.6% |
| Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) | 12.1 | 6.1 | -49.6% |
Royalty Pharma plc has traded in a 11x–404x P/E range over 6 years; current trailing P/E is ~27x. Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated has traded in a 3x–258x P/E range over 5 years; current trailing P/E is ~-919x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cibus, Inc. (CBUS) | -22.72 | -10.83 | +52.3% |
| Royalty Pharma plc (RPRX) | 1.99 | 1.78 | -10.7% |
| Ligand Pharmaceutic… (LGND) | -0.08 | -0.22 | -180.3% |
| Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) | 0.53 | 3.3 | +522.6% |
| BlackRock Technolog… (BTX) | -2.58 | 0.17 | +106.6% |
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Cibus, Inc. generated $-59M FCF in 2024 (-205% vs 2021). Royalty Pharma plc generated $2B FCF in 2025 (+23% vs 2021).
CBUS vs RPRX vs LGND vs INVA vs BTX: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CBUS or RPRX or LGND or INVA or BTX a better buy right now?
Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) offers the better valuation at 6.7x trailing P/E (11.3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cibus, Inc. (CBUS) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CBUS or RPRX or LGND or INVA or BTX?
On trailing P/E, Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) is the cheapest at 6.7x versus BlackRock Technology and Private Equity Term Trust at 38.6x. On forward P/E, Royalty Pharma plc is actually cheaper at 9.7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CBUS or RPRX or LGND or INVA or BTX?
Over the past 5 years, Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) delivered a total return of +101.2%, compared to -99.2% for Cibus, Inc. (CBUS). A $10,000 investment in INVA five years ago would be worth approximately $20K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LGND returned +102.2% versus CBUS's -99.4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CBUS or RPRX or LGND or INVA or BTX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.07β versus Cibus, Inc.'s 1.89β — meaning CBUS is approximately 2584% more volatile than INVA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 91% for Royalty Pharma plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — CBUS or RPRX or LGND or INVA or BTX?
BlackRock Technology and Private Equity Term Trust (BTX) is the more profitable company, earning 87.7% net margin versus -59.0% for Cibus, Inc. — meaning it keeps 87.7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTX leads at 87.7% versus -60.6% for CBUS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CBUS leads at 100.0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CBUS or RPRX or LGND or INVA or BTX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Royalty Pharma plc (RPRX) trades at 9.7x forward P/E versus 23.8x for Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated — 14.1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CBUS: 222.1% to $11.50.
07Which pays a better dividend — CBUS or RPRX or LGND or INVA or BTX?
In this comparison, BTX (13.1% yield), RPRX (1.4% yield) pay a dividend. CBUS, LGND, INVA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is CBUS or RPRX or LGND or INVA or BTX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Royalty Pharma plc (RPRX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.36), 1.4% yield). Cibus, Inc. (CBUS) carries a higher beta of 1.89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RPRX: +16.3%, CBUS: -99.4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CBUS and RPRX and LGND and INVA and BTX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: CBUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RPRX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LGND is a small-cap quality compounder stock; INVA is a small-cap deep-value stock; BTX is a small-cap income-oriented stock. RPRX, BTX pay a dividend while CBUS, LGND, INVA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.