Comprehensive Stock Comparison

Compare Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) vs Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) Stock

Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.

Tickers 2 / 10100+ Metrics

Selected Stocks

Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Quick Verdict

CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCHA167.4% revenue growth vs MNST's 10.7%
ValueCHALower P/E (7.2x vs 37.5x)
Quality / MarginsMNST23.0% net margin vs CHA's 13.6%
Stability / SafetyMNSTBeta 0.30 vs CHA's 1.00
DividendsTieNeither pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)MNST+56.1% vs CHA's -63.6%
Efficiency (ROA)MNST19.1% ROA vs CHA's 15.1%
Bottom line: MNST leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the stronger pick for investors who prioritize profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares is the better choice for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As direct sector peers, they can serve as alternatives in the same portfolio allocation.

Who Each Stock Is For

Income & stability

Growth exposure

Long-term compounding (10Y)

Sleep-well-at-night portfolio

Defensive / Recession hedge

Business Model

What each company does and how it makes money

CHAChagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares
Consumer Defensive

Chagee Holdings operates a premium tea beverage chain with physical teahouses and online platforms across China and internationally. It generates revenue primarily from direct sales of tea drinks through its stores (roughly 70-80%) and franchise fees from its expanding network of franchised locations. The company's competitive advantage lies in its strong brand recognition for premium tea experiences and its vertically integrated supply chain for tea sourcing and product development.

MNSTMonster Beverage Corporation
Consumer Defensive

Monster Beverage is a leading energy drink company that develops, markets, and sells a wide range of energy beverages globally. It generates revenue primarily through its Monster Energy Drinks segment — which accounts for the vast majority of sales — along with its Strategic Brands portfolio and other beverage offerings. The company's moat lies in its powerful Monster Energy brand, extensive distribution network, and strong relationships with bottlers and retailers that create significant barriers to entry.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CHAChagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares

Segment breakdown not available.

MNSTMonster Beverage Corporation
FY 2025
Monster Energy Drinks
92.7%$7.7B
Strategic Brands
5.7%$469M
Alcohol Brands
1.6%$135M

Financial Metrics Comparison

Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging

Financial Scorecard

MNST 3CHA 1
Financial MetricsMNST5/5 metrics
Valuation MetricsCHA5/5 metrics
Profitability & EfficiencyTie3/6 metrics
Total ReturnsMNST6/6 metrics
Risk & VolatilityMNST2/2 metrics
Analyst Outlook0/0 metrics

MNST leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Total Returns). CHA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Financial Metrics (TTM)

CHA is the larger business by revenue, generating $13.3B annually — 1.6x MNST's $8.3B. MNST is the more profitable business, keeping 23.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CHA's 13.6%. On growth, MNST holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCHAChagee Holdings L…MNSTMonster Beverage …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$13.3B$8.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$2.0B$2.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1.8B$1.9B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$2.0B$0
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+47.2%+55.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+15.3%+29.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+13.6%+23.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+14.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-9.4%+17.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-41.8%+64.3%
MNST leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

At 5.5x trailing earnings, CHA trades at a 88% valuation discount to MNST's 44.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CHA's 1.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MNST's 33.6x.

MetricCHAChagee Holdings L…MNSTMonster Beverage …
Market CapShares × price$1.3B$83.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$704M$81.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS5.47x43.97x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.7.15x37.51x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate5.49x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple1.64x33.62x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.73x10.06x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share5.00x10.11x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF3.48x
CHA leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MNST delivers a 23.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $21 for CHA. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHA scores 8/9 vs MNST's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCHAChagee Holdings L…MNSTMonster Beverage …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+20.8%+23.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+15.1%+19.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+33.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+99.8%+31.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–985
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.20x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$4.2B-$2.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$4.8B$2.1B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$548M$0
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense299.84x
Evenly matched — CHA and MNST each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (with DRIP)

A $10,000 investment in MNST five years ago would be worth $19,484 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,637 for CHA. Over the past 12 months, MNST leads with a +56.1% total return vs CHA's -63.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MNST at 18.8% vs CHA's -28.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCHAChagee Holdings L…MNSTMonster Beverage …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-11.2%+12.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-63.6%+56.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-63.6%+67.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-63.6%+94.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-63.6%+307.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-28.6%+18.8%
MNST leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

MNST is the less volatile stock with a 0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHA's 1.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MNST currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs CHA's 26.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCHAChagee Holdings L…MNSTMonster Beverage …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.00x0.30x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$41.80$87.36
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$9.95$53.90
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+26.1%+97.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10050.072.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded742K4.7M
MNST leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Wall Street rates CHA as "Hold" and MNST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 51.0% upside for CHA (target: $17) vs -1.6% for MNST (target: $84).

MetricCHAChagee Holdings L…MNSTMonster Beverage …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$16.50$83.92
# AnalystsCovering analysts1543
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.3%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Historical Charts

Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.

Chart 1Revenue Growth — 10 Years

Stock20162025Change
Chagee Holdings Lim… (CHA)$492M$12.4B+2423.2%
Monster Beverage Co… (MNST)$3.0B$8.3B+172.0%

Monster Beverage Corporation's revenue grew from $3.0B (2016) to $8.3B (2025) — a 11.8% CAGR.

Chart 2Net Margin Trend — 10 Years

Stock20162025Change
Chagee Holdings Lim… (CHA)-18.5%20.3%+209.9%
Monster Beverage Co… (MNST)23.4%23.0%-1.7%

Monster Beverage Corporation's net margin went from 23% (2016) to 23% (2025).

Chart 3P/E Ratio History — 9 Years

Stock20172025Change
Monster Beverage Co… (MNST)44.639.5-11.4%

Monster Beverage Corporation has traded in a 28x–45x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~44x.

Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years

Stock20162025Change
Chagee Holdings Lim… (CHA)-0.7913.71+1835.4%
Monster Beverage Co… (MNST)0.61.94+223.3%

Monster Beverage Corporation's EPS grew from $0.60 (2016) to $1.94 (2025) — a 14% CAGR.

Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years

2021
$1B
2022
$32M
$676M
2023
$2B
$1B
2024
$3B
$2B
2025
$0M
Chagee Holdings Lim… (CHA)Monster Beverage Co… (MNST)

Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares generated $3B FCF in 2024 (+7938% vs 2022). Monster Beverage Corporation generated $0M FCF in 2025 (-100% vs 2021).

Loading custom metrics...

CHA vs MNST: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CHA or MNST a better buy right now?

Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) offers the better valuation at 5.5x trailing P/E (7.2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) a "Buy" — based on 43 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CHA or MNST?

On trailing P/E, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) is the cheapest at 5.5x versus Monster Beverage Corporation at 44.0x. On forward P/E, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares is actually cheaper at 7.2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CHA or MNST?

Over the past 5 years, Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) delivered a total return of +94.8%, compared to -63.6% for Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA). A $10,000 investment in MNST five years ago would be worth approximately $19K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MNST returned +307.7% versus CHA's -63.6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CHA or MNST?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) is the lower-risk stock at 0.30β versus Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares's 1.00β — meaning CHA is approximately 231% more volatile than MNST relative to the S&P 500.

05

Which has better profit margins — CHA or MNST?

Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) is the more profitable company, earning 23.0% net margin versus 20.3% for Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares — meaning it keeps 23.0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MNST leads at 29.2% versus 23.3% for CHA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNST leads at 55.8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is CHA or MNST more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) trades at 7.2x forward P/E versus 37.5x for Monster Beverage Corporation — 30.4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHA: 51.0% to $16.50.

07

Which pays a better dividend — CHA or MNST?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is CHA or MNST better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.30), +307.7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MNST: +307.7%, CHA: -63.6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between CHA and MNST?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: CHA is a small-cap deep-value stock; MNST is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.

📊
Stocks Like

CHA

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
🚀
Stocks Like

MNST

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Better Than Both

Find stocks that beat CHA and MNST on the metrics you choose

Revenue Growth>
%
(CHA: -9.4% · MNST: 17.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(CHA: 13.6% · MNST: 23.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CHA: 5.5x · MNST: 44.0x)