Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSKW) vs JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CLSKW | 102.2% revenue growth vs JPM's 14.6% |
| Value | CLSKW | Lower P/E (0.3x vs 13.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | CLSKW | 47.6% net margin vs JPM's 21.6% |
| Stability / Safety | JPM | Beta 1.00 vs CLSKW's 2.34 |
| Dividends | CLSKW | 10.8% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.7% |
| Momentum (1Y) | JPM | +15.7% vs CLSKW's -34.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | JPM | 1.3% ROA vs CLSKW's -7.8%, ROIC 5.4% vs 9.9% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
CleanSpark is a Bitcoin mining company that operates data centers primarily powered by low-carbon energy sources. It generates revenue almost entirely from Bitcoin mining rewards and transaction fees — earning newly minted Bitcoin through its computing power contribution to the network. The company's key advantage is its focus on sustainable energy sources and strategic location in low-cost power regions, which gives it a cost edge in the energy-intensive mining process.
JPMorgan Chase is a global financial services giant that operates as a universal bank offering consumer banking, investment banking, commercial banking, and asset management services. It generates revenue primarily through net interest income from lending activities (about 50% of total revenue) and non-interest income from investment banking fees, trading, asset management, and card services. The company's key competitive advantage lies in its massive scale, diversified revenue streams, and fortress balance sheet—which together create significant barriers to entry and provide stability through economic cycles.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Risk & Volatility). CLSKW leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $270.8B annually — 353.4x CLSKW's $766M. CLSKW is the more profitable business, keeping 47.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JPM's 21.6%.
| Metric | CLSKWCleanSpark, Inc. | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $766M | $270.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $117M | $81.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$261M | $58.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$627M | -$119.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.2% | +58.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +41.6% | +27.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +47.6% | +21.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -79.0% | -15.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
At 0.3x trailing earnings, CLSKW trades at a 98% valuation discount to JPM's 15.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CLSKW's 1.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JPM's 13.1x.
| Metric | CLSKWCleanSpark, Inc. | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $89M | $809.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $870M | $1.09T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.28x | 15.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.17x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.30x | 13.15x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.12x | 2.99x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.05x | 2.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 16.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-19 for CLSKW. CLSKW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.38x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs CLSKW's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | CLSKWCleanSpark, Inc. | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -18.9% | +16.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.8% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.9% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.7% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.38x | 2.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $781M | $281.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $43M | $469.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $824M | $751.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 25.88x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in CLSKW five years ago would be worth $56,818 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $21,449 for JPM. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +15.7% total return vs CLSKW's -34.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLSKW at 78.4% vs JPM's 30.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CLSKWCleanSpark, Inc. | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.8% | -7.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -34.4% | +15.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +468.2% | +119.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +468.2% | +114.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +468.2% | +497.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +78.4% | +30.0% |
Risk & Volatility
JPM is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLSKW's 2.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 89.0% from its 52-week high vs CLSKW's 30.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CLSKWCleanSpark, Inc. | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.34x | 1.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.02 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.15 | $202.16 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +30.6% | +89.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.7 | 48.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 154K | 9.0M |
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, CLSKW offers the higher dividend yield at 10.82% vs JPM's 1.71%.
| Metric | CLSKWCleanSpark, Inc. | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $336.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +10.8% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.03 | $5.13 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +100.0% | +3.5% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Nov 24 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSKW) | 100 | 439.82 | +339.8% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 125.62 | +25.6% |
CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSKW) returned +468% over 5 years vs JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)'s +114%. A $10,000 investment in CLSKW 5 years ago would be worth $56,818 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSKW) | $82031.00 | $766M | +934076.1% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | $106.4B | $270.8B | +154.5% |
CleanSpark, Inc.'s revenue grew from $0M (2016) to $766M (2025) — a 176.2% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSKW) | -31.0% | 47.6% | +253.6% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 23.2% | 21.6% | -7.1% |
CleanSpark, Inc.'s net margin went from -31% (2016) to 48% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 8 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 16.9 | 12.1 | -28.4% |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. has traded in a 10x–17x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~15x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSKW) | -1.13 | 1.12 | +199.1% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 6.19 | 19.75 | +219.1% |
CleanSpark, Inc.'s EPS grew from $-1.13 (2016) to $1.12 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
CleanSpark, Inc. generated $-606M FCF in 2025 (-140% vs 2021). JPMorgan Chase & Co. generated $-42B FCF in 2024 (-154% vs 2021).
CLSKW vs JPM: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CLSKW or JPM a better buy right now?
CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSKW) offers the better valuation at 0.3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 60 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CLSKW or JPM?
On trailing P/E, CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSKW) is the cheapest at 0.3x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. at 15.2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CLSKW or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSKW) delivered a total return of +468.2%, compared to +114.5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). A $10,000 investment in CLSKW five years ago would be worth approximately $57K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +497.7% versus CLSKW's +468.2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CLSKW or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 1.00β versus CleanSpark, Inc.'s 2.34β — meaning CLSKW is approximately 133% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSKW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 38% versus 2% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — CLSKW or JPM?
CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSKW) is the more profitable company, earning 47.6% net margin versus 21.6% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — meaning it keeps 47.6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLSKW leads at 41.6% versus 27.7% for JPM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 58.6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CLSKW or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSKW) offers the highest yield at 10.8%, versus 1.7% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).
07Is CLSKW or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.00), 1.7% yield, +497.7% 10Y return). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSKW) carries a higher beta of 2.34 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +497.7%, CLSKW: +468.2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CLSKW and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.