Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) vs Citigroup Inc. (C) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | C | 9.9% revenue growth vs CM's -3.1% |
| Value | CM | Lower P/E (10.1x vs 10.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | CM | 13.6% net margin vs C's 7.4% |
| Stability / Safety | CM | Beta 0.48 vs C's 1.30 |
| Dividends | CM | 3.1% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs C's 2.5% |
| Momentum (1Y) | CM | +71.4% vs C's +40.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CM | 0.8% ROA vs C's 0.6%, ROIC 2.1% vs 1.6% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce is a major Canadian bank offering personal and commercial banking, wealth management, and capital markets services. It generates revenue primarily through net interest income from loans and deposits (roughly 60%) and non-interest income from fees, trading, and investment banking (roughly 40%). The bank's competitive advantage lies in its entrenched domestic retail banking network—particularly in Ontario and Quebec—and its integrated wealth management platform.
Citigroup is a global financial services giant operating through two main divisions: Global Consumer Banking serving retail customers and Institutional Clients Group serving corporations and institutions. It generates revenue primarily from interest income on loans and securities (about 60%) and non-interest income from investment banking, trading, and card fees (about 40%). The company's key advantage is its unparalleled global network spanning nearly 100 countries—particularly strong in emerging markets—which provides unique cross-border banking capabilities for multinational clients.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
CM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). C leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
C is the larger business by revenue, generating $170.7B annually — 2.8x CM's $62.0B. CM is the more profitable business, keeping 13.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to C's 7.4%.
| Metric | CMCanadian Imperial… | CCitigroup Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $62.0B | $170.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12.1B | $24.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8.4B | $14.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$416M | -$76.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.0% | +41.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.6% | +10.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.6% | +7.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -39.4% | -15.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.2% | +23.2% |
Valuation Metrics
At 16.1x trailing earnings, CM trades at a 13% valuation discount to C's 18.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, C's 23.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CM's 35.3x.
| Metric | CMCanadian Imperial… | CCitigroup Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $93.6B | $192.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $312.8B | $506.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.12x | 18.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.07x | 10.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.02x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 35.33x | 23.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.06x | 1.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.02x | 1.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CM delivers a 13.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $7 for C. C carries lower financial leverage with a 2.82x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CM's 5.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), C scores 5/9 vs CM's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | CMCanadian Imperial… | CCitigroup Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.1% | +6.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.1% | +1.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.3% | +3.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.52x | 2.82x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $300.1B | $314.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $55.7B | $276.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $355.8B | $590.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.33x | 0.24x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in CM five years ago would be worth $24,578 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,396 for C. Over the past 12 months, CM leads with a +71.4% total return vs C's +40.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CM at 33.6% vs C's 32.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CMCanadian Imperial… | CCitigroup Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.9% | -6.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +71.4% | +40.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +138.6% | +130.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +145.8% | +74.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +280.2% | +230.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.6% | +32.1% |
Risk & Volatility
CM is the less volatile stock with a 0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than C's 1.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CM currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs C's 88.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CMCanadian Imperial… | CCitigroup Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.48x | 1.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $105.00 | $125.16 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $53.62 | $55.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.2% | +88.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.4 | 51.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 988K | 11.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CM as "Hold" and C as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 19.8% upside for C (target: $132) vs 5.6% for CM (target: $107). For income investors, CM offers the higher dividend yield at 3.07% vs C's 2.48%.
| Metric | CMCanadian Imperial… | CCitigroup Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $106.62 | $132.09 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.1% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.24 | $2.73 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.4% | +3.9% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Feb 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canadian Imperial B… (CM) | 100 | 249.15 | +149.1% |
| Citigroup Inc. (C) | 100 | 183.15 | +83.2% |
Canadian Imperial B… (CM) returned +146% over 5 years vs Citigroup Inc. (C)'s +74%. A $10,000 investment in CM 5 years ago would be worth $24,578 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canadian Imperial B… (CM) | $18.2B | $62.0B | +241.3% |
| Citigroup Inc. (C) | $83.3B | $170.7B | +104.9% |
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce's revenue grew from $18.2B (2016) to $62.0B (2025) — a 14.6% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canadian Imperial B… (CM) | 23.5% | 13.6% | -42.2% |
| Citigroup Inc. (C) | 17.9% | 7.4% | -58.5% |
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce's net margin went from 24% (2016) to 14% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canadian Imperial B… (CM) | 8.7 | 10.6 | +21.8% |
| Citigroup Inc. (C) | 7.8 | 11.8 | +51.3% |
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce has traded in a 6x–11x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~16x. Citigroup Inc. has traded in a 6x–13x P/E range over 7 years; current trailing P/E is ~19x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canadian Imperial B… (CM) | 5.35 | 8.57 | +60.2% |
| Citigroup Inc. (C) | 4.74 | 5.95 | +25.5% |
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce's EPS grew from $5.35 (2016) to $8.57 (2025) — a 5% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce generated $-24B FCF in 2025 (-486% vs 2021). Citigroup Inc. generated $-26B FCF in 2024 (-161% vs 2021).
CM vs C: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CM or C a better buy right now?
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) offers the better valuation at 16.1x trailing P/E (10.1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citigroup Inc. (C) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CM or C?
On trailing P/E, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) is the cheapest at 16.1x versus Citigroup Inc. at 18.5x. On forward P/E, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce is actually cheaper at 10.1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CM or C?
Over the past 5 years, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) delivered a total return of +145.8%, compared to +74.0% for Citigroup Inc. (C). A $10,000 investment in CM five years ago would be worth approximately $25K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CM returned +280.2% versus C's +230.3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CM or C?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.48β versus Citigroup Inc.'s 1.30β — meaning C is approximately 168% more volatile than CM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Citigroup Inc. (C) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 6% for Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — CM or C?
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) is the more profitable company, earning 13.6% net margin versus 7.4% for Citigroup Inc. — meaning it keeps 13.6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CM leads at 17.6% versus 10.0% for C. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CM leads at 43.0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CM or C more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) trades at 10.1x forward P/E versus 10.7x for Citigroup Inc. — 0.6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for C: 19.8% to $132.09.
07Which pays a better dividend — CM or C?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) offers the highest yield at 3.1%, versus 2.5% for Citigroup Inc. (C).
08Is CM or C better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.48), 3.1% yield, +280.2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CM: +280.2%, C: +230.3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CM and C?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: CM is a mid-cap deep-value stock; C is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.