Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Cineverse Corp. (CNVS) vs iQIYI, Inc. (IQ) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CNVS | 59.1% revenue growth vs IQ's -8.3% |
| Value | IQ | Lower P/E (2.5x vs 18.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | IQ | -1.4% net margin vs CNVS's -16.7% |
| Stability / Safety | IQ | Beta 1.31 vs CNVS's 1.49 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | IQ | -16.1% vs CNVS's -18.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | IQ | -0.9% ROA vs CNVS's -13.4%, ROIC 5.8% vs 20.3% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Cineverse Corp. is a streaming technology and entertainment company that operates a portfolio of niche streaming channels and provides technology services to other streaming platforms. It generates revenue through a mix of subscription fees from its SVOD channels, advertising on its AVOD and FAST channels, and technology licensing fees to third-party streaming services. The company's competitive advantage lies in its proprietary streaming technology platform and its focus on underserved niche content categories — particularly genre films and enthusiast programming — which creates a defensible position in the fragmented streaming market.
iQIYI is a leading Chinese online entertainment platform that provides streaming video content including dramas, movies, variety shows, and animations. It generates revenue primarily through membership subscriptions (around 60% of revenue) and online advertising (roughly 25%), with additional income from content distribution and other services. The company's competitive advantage lies in its massive proprietary content library — particularly its popular original productions — and its deep integration within the broader Baidu ecosystem.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
CNVS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). IQ leads in 2 (Financial Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
IQ is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.1B annually — 489.9x CNVS's $55M. IQ is the more profitable business, keeping -1.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNVS's -16.7%. On growth, IQ holds the edge at -7.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CNVSCineverse Corp. | IQiQIYI, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $55M | $27.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $6.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | -$390M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$13M | $466M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.9% | +21.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -12.5% | +1.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -16.7% | -1.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -22.8% | +1.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -60.0% | -7.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -113.2% | -2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
At 15.7x trailing earnings, IQ trades at a 16% valuation discount to CNVS's 18.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CNVS's 3.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IQ's 26.1x.
| Metric | CNVSCineverse Corp. | IQiQIYI, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $59M | $5.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $45M | $6.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.81x | 15.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 2.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.88x | 26.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.75x | 1.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.42x | 0.88x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.63x | 19.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IQ delivers a -2.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-3 in annual profit, vs $-24 for CNVS. CNVS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQ's 1.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CNVS scores 7/9 vs IQ's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | CNVSCineverse Corp. | IQiQIYI, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -24.4% | -2.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -13.4% | -0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +20.3% | +5.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +22.3% | +7.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 1.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$13M | $10.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $3.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $462,000 | $14.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.16x | 0.77x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in CNVS five years ago would be worth $1,075 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $699 for IQ. Over the past 12 months, IQ leads with a -16.1% total return vs CNVS's -18.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CNVS at -29.5% vs IQ's -38.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CNVSCineverse Corp. | IQiQIYI, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +43.3% | -12.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -18.0% | -16.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.0% | -77.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.3% | -93.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.2% | -88.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -29.5% | -38.7% |
Risk & Volatility
IQ is the less volatile stock with a 1.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CNVS's 1.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IQ currently trades 62.3% from its 52-week high vs CNVS's 40.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CNVSCineverse Corp. | IQiQIYI, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.49x | 1.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.39 | $2.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.77 | $1.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +40.7% | +62.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.7 | 36.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 238K | 7.9M |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | CNVSCineverse Corp. | IQiQIYI, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $2.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Feb 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cineverse Corp. (CNVS) | 100 | 20.39 | -79.6% |
| iQIYI, Inc. (IQ) | 100 | 8.15 | -91.9% |
Cineverse Corp. (CNVS) returned -89% over 5 years vs iQIYI, Inc. (IQ)'s -93%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cineverse Corp. (CNVS) | $104M | $78M | -25.1% |
| iQIYI, Inc. (IQ) | $11.2B | $29.2B | +160.1% |
Cineverse Corp.'s revenue grew from $104M (2016) to $78M (2025) — a -3.2% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cineverse Corp. (CNVS) | -40.0% | 4.6% | +111.5% |
| iQIYI, Inc. (IQ) | -27.4% | 2.6% | +109.6% |
Cineverse Corp.'s net margin went from -40% (2016) to 5% (2025).
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cineverse Corp. (CNVS) | -130.2 | 0.16 | +100.1% |
| iQIYI, Inc. (IQ) | -11.45 | 0.77 | +106.7% |
Cineverse Corp.'s EPS grew from $-130.20 (2016) to $0.16 (2025).
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Cineverse Corp. generated $16M FCF in 2025 (+172% vs 2021). iQIYI, Inc. generated $2B FCF in 2024 (+130% vs 2021).
CNVS vs IQ: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CNVS or IQ a better buy right now?
iQIYI, Inc. (IQ) offers the better valuation at 15.7x trailing P/E (2.5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate iQIYI, Inc. (IQ) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CNVS or IQ?
On trailing P/E, iQIYI, Inc. (IQ) is the cheapest at 15.7x versus Cineverse Corp. at 18.8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CNVS or IQ?
Over the past 5 years, Cineverse Corp. (CNVS) delivered a total return of -89.3%, compared to -93.0% for iQIYI, Inc. (IQ). A $10,000 investment in CNVS five years ago would be worth approximately $1K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IQ returned -88.6% versus CNVS's -94.2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CNVS or IQ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), iQIYI, Inc. (IQ) is the lower-risk stock at 1.31β versus Cineverse Corp.'s 1.49β — meaning CNVS is approximately 14% more volatile than IQ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cineverse Corp. (CNVS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 106% for iQIYI, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — CNVS or IQ?
Cineverse Corp. (CNVS) is the more profitable company, earning 4.6% net margin versus 2.6% for iQIYI, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4.6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CNVS leads at 10.1% versus 6.2% for IQ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CNVS leads at 50.4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CNVS or IQ?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is CNVS or IQ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, iQIYI, Inc. (IQ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IQ: -88.6%, CNVS: -94.2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CNVS and IQ?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: CNVS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IQ is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.