Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) vs Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CRUS | 6.0% revenue growth vs MRVL's 4.7% |
| Value | CRUS | Lower P/E (15.6x vs 28.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | MRVL | 31.7% net margin vs CRUS's 20.5% |
| Stability / Safety | CRUS | Beta 1.30 vs MRVL's 2.25, lower leverage |
| Dividends | MRVL | 0.3% yield; CRUS pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | CRUS | +35.4% vs MRVL's -10.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CRUS | 16.4% ROA vs MRVL's 11.5%, ROIC 20.4% vs -3.1% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Cirrus Logic is a fabless semiconductor company that designs high-precision mixed-signal chips for audio and power management applications. It generates revenue primarily from audio components for smartphones and other consumer electronics—with Apple accounting for the majority of sales—alongside power conversion and haptic driver chips for industrial markets. The company's competitive advantage lies in its deep expertise in low-power, high-fidelity audio processing and its entrenched position as a key supplier to major smartphone manufacturers.
Marvell Technology is a semiconductor company that designs and sells data infrastructure chips for data centers, enterprise networking, and automotive applications. It generates revenue primarily from data center products (~40%), enterprise networking (~30%), and carrier infrastructure (~20%), with the remainder from consumer and automotive segments. The company's moat lies in its specialized expertise in data processing, storage, and networking semiconductors—particularly in high-growth areas like cloud computing and AI infrastructure.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
CRUS leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
MRVL is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.8B annually — 3.9x CRUS's $2.0B. MRVL is the more profitable business, keeping 31.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRUS's 20.5%. On growth, MRVL holds the edge at +36.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CRUSCirrus Logic, Inc. | MRVLMarvell Technolog… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.0B | $7.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $495M | $2.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $404M | $2.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $615M | $1.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.9% | +50.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.1% | +14.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.5% | +31.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +31.1% | +20.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.5% | +36.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.1% | +3.8% |
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CRUS's 15.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MRVL's 116.5x.
| Metric | CRUSCirrus Logic, Inc. | MRVLMarvell Technolog… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.4B | $70.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.0B | $74.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.52x | -80.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.59x | 28.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.32x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.14x | 116.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.89x | 12.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.00x | 5.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.76x | 50.91x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CRUS delivers a 18.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $18 for MRVL. CRUS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MRVL's 0.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CRUS scores 9/9 vs MRVL's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | CRUSCirrus Logic, Inc. | MRVLMarvell Technolog… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.7% | +17.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +16.4% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +20.4% | -3.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +19.6% | -3.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$396M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $540M | $948M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $144M | $4.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 537.37x | 14.82x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in CRUS five years ago would be worth $16,935 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,739 for MRVL. Over the past 12 months, CRUS leads with a +35.4% total return vs MRVL's -10.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MRVL at 22.2% vs CRUS's 11.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CRUSCirrus Logic, Inc. | MRVLMarvell Technolog… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.9% | -8.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.4% | -10.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.3% | +82.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.4% | +67.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +300.6% | +780.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.2% | +22.2% |
Risk & Volatility
CRUS is the less volatile stock with a 1.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MRVL's 2.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CRUS currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs MRVL's 79.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CRUSCirrus Logic, Inc. | MRVLMarvell Technolog… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.30x | 2.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $146.88 | $102.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $75.83 | $47.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.1% | +79.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.0 | 48.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 509K | 11.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CRUS as "Buy" and MRVL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.1% upside for MRVL (target: $118) vs 2.4% for CRUS (target: $145). MRVL is the only dividend payer here at 0.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | CRUSCirrus Logic, Inc. | MRVLMarvell Technolog… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $144.50 | $117.68 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 71 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.0% | +1.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) | 100 | 183.46 | +83.5% |
| Marvell Technology,… (MRVL) | 100 | 358.2 | +258.2% |
Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) returned +69% over 5 years vs Marvell Technology,… (MRVL)'s +67%. A $10,000 investment in CRUS 5 years ago would be worth $16,935 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) | $1.2B | $1.9B | +62.2% |
| Marvell Technology,… (MRVL) | $2.6B | $5.8B | +117.7% |
Cirrus Logic, Inc.'s revenue grew from $1.2B (2016) to $1.9B (2025) — a 5.5% CAGR. Marvell Technology, Inc.'s revenue grew from $2.6B (2016) to $5.8B (2025) — a 9.0% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) | 10.6% | 17.5% | +65.4% |
| Marvell Technology,… (MRVL) | -30.6% | -15.3% | +49.9% |
Cirrus Logic, Inc.'s net margin went from 11% (2016) to 17% (2025). Marvell Technology, Inc.'s net margin went from -31% (2016) to -15% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) | 13.2 | 19.8 | +50.0% |
Cirrus Logic, Inc. has traded in a 13x–56x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~24x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) | 1.87 | 6 | +220.9% |
| Marvell Technology,… (MRVL) | -1.59 | -1.02 | +35.8% |
Cirrus Logic, Inc.'s EPS grew from $1.87 (2016) to $6.00 (2025) — a 14% CAGR. Marvell Technology, Inc.'s EPS grew from $-1.59 (2016) to $-1.02 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Cirrus Logic, Inc. generated $416M FCF in 2025 (+26% vs 2021). Marvell Technology, Inc. generated $1B FCF in 2025 (+99% vs 2021).
CRUS vs MRVL: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CRUS or MRVL a better buy right now?
Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) offers the better valuation at 23.5x trailing P/E (15.6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CRUS or MRVL?
On forward P/E, Cirrus Logic, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15.6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CRUS or MRVL?
Over the past 5 years, Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) delivered a total return of +69.4%, compared to +67.4% for Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL). A $10,000 investment in CRUS five years ago would be worth approximately $17K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MRVL returned +780.5% versus CRUS's +300.6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CRUS or MRVL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.30β versus Marvell Technology, Inc.'s 2.25β — meaning MRVL is approximately 73% more volatile than CRUS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 32% for Marvell Technology, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — CRUS or MRVL?
Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) is the more profitable company, earning 17.5% net margin versus -15.3% for Marvell Technology, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17.5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRUS leads at 21.6% versus -12.5% for MRVL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRUS leads at 52.5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CRUS or MRVL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) trades at 15.6x forward P/E versus 28.7x for Marvell Technology, Inc. — 13.1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MRVL: 44.1% to $117.68.
07Which pays a better dividend — CRUS or MRVL?
In this comparison, MRVL (0.3% yield) pays a dividend. CRUS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is CRUS or MRVL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.30), +300.6% 10Y return). Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) carries a higher beta of 2.25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CRUS: +300.6%, MRVL: +780.5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CRUS and MRVL?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.