Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Fenbo Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (FEBO) vs Universal Electronics Inc. (UEIC) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FEBO | 11.9% revenue growth vs UEIC's -6.1% |
| Quality / Margins | FEBO | -0.9% net margin vs UEIC's -5.6% |
| Stability / Safety | UEIC | Lower D/E ratio (32.5% vs 57.8%) |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | FEBO | -6.2% vs UEIC's -51.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FEBO | -1.3% ROA vs UEIC's -7.9%, ROIC -7.7% vs -6.0% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Fenbo Holdings is a manufacturer of personal care electric appliances — primarily hair styling tools like curling wands, straighteners, and hair dryers — along with some toy products. It generates revenue through direct sales of its manufactured products to customers across global markets including Europe, North America, and Asia. The company benefits from established manufacturing expertise and a diversified geographic customer base that reduces regional market dependence.
Universal Electronics is a technology company that designs and manufactures universal remote controls, smart home devices, and control systems for consumer electronics and home automation. It generates revenue primarily from selling pre-programmed remote controls to video service providers and OEMs (~60% of sales), integrated circuits with embedded control software (~25%), and cloud services and licensing for its control technology (~15%). The company's key advantage is its extensive universal device control database—covering over 500,000 devices—which creates significant switching costs for customers who rely on its compatibility ecosystem.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
FEBO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). UEIC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
UEIC is the larger business by revenue, generating $391M annually — 2.6x FEBO's $148M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -0.9% (FEBO) to -5.6% (UEIC). On growth, UEIC holds the edge at -11.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FEBOFenbo Holdings Li… | UEICUniversal Electro… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $148M | $391M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $550,285 | $4M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1M | -$22M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $28M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.4% | +28.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.0% | -3.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.9% | -5.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +7.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -47.9% | -11.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -101.2% | -2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FEBOFenbo Holdings Li… | UEICUniversal Electro… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12M | $50M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12M | $73M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.88x | -2.04x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 26.57x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.69x | 0.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.00x | 0.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FEBO delivers a -0.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-0 in annual profit, vs $-15 for UEIC. UEIC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FEBO's 0.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UEIC scores 6/9 vs FEBO's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | FEBOFenbo Holdings Li… | UEICUniversal Electro… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.3% | -15.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.3% | -7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.7% | -6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -25.0% | -8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.58x | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $23M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $27M | $27M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $26M | $50M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.00x | -15.50x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in FEBO five years ago would be worth $2,387 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $622 for UEIC. Over the past 12 months, FEBO leads with a -6.2% total return vs UEIC's -51.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UEIC at -33.3% vs FEBO's -38.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FEBOFenbo Holdings Li… | UEICUniversal Electro… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.4% | +3.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -6.2% | -51.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.1% | -70.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.1% | -93.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.1% | -92.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -38.0% | -33.3% |
Risk & Volatility
FEBO is the less volatile stock with a -0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UEIC's 1.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FEBO currently trades 71.1% from its 52-week high vs UEIC's 46.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FEBOFenbo Holdings Li… | UEICUniversal Electro… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.07x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.49 | $8.07 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.61 | $2.69 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.1% | +46.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.8 | 45.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16K | 59K |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | FEBOFenbo Holdings Li… | UEICUniversal Electro… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.9% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Nov 23 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fenbo Holdings Limi… (FEBO) | 100 | 24.1 | -75.9% |
| Universal Electroni… (UEIC) | 100 | 50.32 | -49.7% |
Fenbo Holdings Limi… (FEBO) returned -76% over 5 years vs Universal Electroni… (UEIC)'s -94%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fenbo Holdings Limi… (FEBO) | $144M | $133M | -7.7% |
| Universal Electroni… (UEIC) | $603M | $395M | -34.5% |
Universal Electronics Inc.'s revenue grew from $603M (2015) to $395M (2024) — a -4.6% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fenbo Holdings Limi… (FEBO) | 3.0% | -11.6% | -487.6% |
| Universal Electroni… (UEIC) | 4.8% | -6.1% | -225.7% |
Universal Electronics Inc.'s net margin went from 5% (2015) to -6% (2024).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 4 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2021 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Universal Electroni… (UEIC) | 29.7 | 104.5 | +251.9% |
Universal Electronics Inc. has traded in a 19x–201x P/E range over 4 years; current trailing P/E is ~-2x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fenbo Holdings Limi… (FEBO) | 0.06 | -1.41 | -2626.9% |
| Universal Electroni… (UEIC) | 1.88 | -1.85 | -198.4% |
Universal Electronics Inc.'s EPS grew from $1.88 (2015) to $-1.85 (2024) — a NaN% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Fenbo Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares generated $-22M FCF in 2024 (-468% vs 2021). Universal Electronics Inc. generated $6M FCF in 2024 (-72% vs 2021).
FEBO vs UEIC: Frequently Asked Questions
6 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Which is the better long-term investment — FEBO or UEIC?
Over the past 5 years, Fenbo Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (FEBO) delivered a total return of -76.1%, compared to -93.8% for Universal Electronics Inc. (UEIC). A $10,000 investment in FEBO five years ago would be worth approximately $2K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FEBO returned -76.1% versus UEIC's -92.9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
02Which is safer — FEBO or UEIC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fenbo Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (FEBO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.07β versus Universal Electronics Inc.'s 1.12β — meaning UEIC is approximately -1650% more volatile than FEBO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Universal Electronics Inc. (UEIC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 58% for Fenbo Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
03Which has better profit margins — FEBO or UEIC?
Universal Electronics Inc. (UEIC) is the more profitable company, earning -6.1% net margin versus -11.6% for Fenbo Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps -6.1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UEIC leads at -3.9% versus -10.4% for FEBO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UEIC leads at 28.9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
04Which pays a better dividend — FEBO or UEIC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
05Is FEBO or UEIC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fenbo Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (FEBO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.07)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FEBO: -76.1%, UEIC: -92.9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
06What are the main differences between FEBO and UEIC?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.