Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) vs Smart Powerr Corp. (CREG) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Quality / Margins | FLNC | -2.0% net margin vs CREG's -36.2% |
| Stability / Safety | CREG | Beta 0.38 vs FLNC's 2.25, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | FLNC | +171.7% vs CREG's -85.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CREG | -2.3% ROA vs FLNC's -2.3%, ROIC -0.7% vs -12.0% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Fluence Energy is a global provider of energy storage systems and AI-powered digital applications for renewable energy integration. It generates revenue primarily through selling battery storage hardware (Gridstack, Sunstack, Edgestack) and providing related services like engineering, maintenance, and energy storage-as-a-service contracts. The company benefits from its joint venture ownership by Siemens and AES Corporation — which provides deep industry expertise, global scale, and established customer relationships in the utility sector.
Smart Powerr Corp. is a Chinese energy recycling company that designs and operates waste-to-energy projects for industrial clients. It generates revenue primarily from waste pressure-to-energy systems (like blast furnace gas recovery), waste heat-to-energy projects for cement and steel plants, and waste gas-to-energy solutions for mining and petroleum operations. The company's competitive advantage lies in its specialized expertise in capturing and converting industrial waste streams—pressure, heat, and gas—into electricity for energy-intensive manufacturers.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
FLNC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Total Returns). CREG leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
FLNC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.6B annually — 30798.0x CREG's $82,839. FLNC is the more profitable business, keeping -2.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CREG's -36.2%.
| Metric | FLNCFluence Energy, I… | CREGSmart Powerr Corp. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.6B | $82,839 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | -$3M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$52M | -$3M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$195M | $51M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.7% | -30.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.6% | -32.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | -36.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.6% | +614.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +154.4% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.3% | -4.1% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FLNCFluence Energy, I… | CREGSmart Powerr Corp. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $800M | $3M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $500M | $8M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -42.00x | -0.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.35x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.69x | 0.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.99x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CREG delivers a -2.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-3 in annual profit, vs $-11 for FLNC. CREG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FLNC's 0.71x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLNC scores 3/9 vs CREG's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | FLNCFluence Energy, I… | CREGSmart Powerr Corp. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.6% | -2.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.3% | -2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -12.0% | -0.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.3% | -1.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.71x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$300M | $5M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $691M | $25,341 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $391M | $5M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -8.49x | -2.29x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in FLNC five years ago would be worth $4,440 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $127 for CREG. Over the past 12 months, FLNC leads with a +171.7% total return vs CREG's -85.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLNC at -5.9% vs CREG's -58.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FLNCFluence Energy, I… | CREGSmart Powerr Corp. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -32.5% | -14.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +171.7% | -85.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.8% | -92.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.6% | -98.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.6% | -99.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.9% | -58.5% |
Risk & Volatility
CREG is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLNC's 2.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLNC currently trades 46.4% from its 52-week high vs CREG's 7.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FLNCFluence Energy, I… | CREGSmart Powerr Corp. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.25x | 0.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $33.51 | $14.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.46 | $0.93 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +46.4% | +7.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 32.9 | 49.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.9M | 68K |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | FLNCFluence Energy, I… | CREGSmart Powerr Corp. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.08 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 27 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Oct 21 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) | 100 | 88.26 | -11.7% |
| Smart Powerr Corp. (CREG) | 100 | 1.77 | -98.2% |
Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) returned -56% over 5 years vs Smart Powerr Corp. (CREG)'s -99%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) | $92M | $2.3B | +2355.6% |
| Smart Powerr Corp. (CREG) | $4M | $0.00 | -100.0% |
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) | -51.0% | -2.1% | +95.8% |
| Smart Powerr Corp. (CREG) | -10.8% | -10.1% | +6.1% |
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) | -0.95 | -0.37 | +61.1% |
| Smart Powerr Corp. (CREG) | -581.2 | -1.82 | +99.7% |
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Fluence Energy, Inc. generated $-175M FCF in 2025 (+39% vs 2021). Smart Powerr Corp. generated $0M FCF in 2024 (+117% vs 2021).
FLNC vs CREG: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FLNC or CREG a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) a "Hold" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FLNC or CREG?
Over the past 5 years, Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) delivered a total return of -55.6%, compared to -98.7% for Smart Powerr Corp. (CREG). A $10,000 investment in FLNC five years ago would be worth approximately $4K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FLNC returned -55.6% versus CREG's -99.7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FLNC or CREG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Smart Powerr Corp. (CREG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.38β versus Fluence Energy, Inc.'s 2.25β — meaning FLNC is approximately 495% more volatile than CREG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Smart Powerr Corp. (CREG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 71% for Fluence Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — FLNC or CREG?
Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) is the more profitable company, earning -2.1% net margin versus -36.2% for Smart Powerr Corp. — meaning it keeps -2.1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FLNC leads at -1.5% versus -32.9% for CREG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FLNC leads at 13.1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — FLNC or CREG?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is FLNC or CREG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Smart Powerr Corp. (CREG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.38)). Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) carries a higher beta of 2.25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CREG: -99.7%, FLNC: -55.6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between FLNC and CREG?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.