Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND) vs Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FND | 5.1% revenue growth vs LIVE's -5.9% |
| Value | LIVE | Lower P/E (2.8x vs 33.3x), PEG 0.29 vs 38.90 |
| Quality / Margins | LIVE | 5.0% net margin vs FND's 4.7% |
| Stability / Safety | LIVE | Beta 0.48 vs FND's 1.30 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | LIVE | +73.6% vs FND's -28.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | LIVE | 5.7% ROA vs FND's 3.9%, ROIC 3.5% vs 5.3% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Valuation efficiency (growth/$)
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Floor & Decor is a specialty retailer operating warehouse-format stores that sell hard surface flooring — tile, wood, laminate, vinyl, and natural stone — along with installation accessories to both professional contractors and do-it-yourself homeowners. It generates revenue primarily through in-store sales (roughly 90% of total) with the remainder from e-commerce, serving a mix of professional installers, commercial businesses, and retail customers. The company's competitive advantage lies in its large-format, low-cost warehouse model that offers extensive in-stock selection at value prices — a difficult-to-replicate physical footprint and supply chain.
Live Ventures is a diversified holding company operating in flooring manufacturing, steel production, and specialty retail. It generates revenue through three main segments: flooring manufacturing (~40% of sales), steel manufacturing (~35%), and retail operations (~25%) selling entertainment products through its Vintage Stock stores. The company's competitive advantage lies in its operational diversification across recession-resistant industries and its vertically integrated flooring business that controls manufacturing from yarn to finished products.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
FND leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Total Returns). LIVE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
FND is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 10.5x LIVE's $442M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.0% (LIVE) to 4.7% (FND). On growth, FND holds the edge at +5.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FNDFloor & Decor Hol… | LIVELive Ventures Inc… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.7B | $442M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $524M | $29M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $217M | $22M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $23M | $22M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +42.3% | +33.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +3.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | +5.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | +5.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.5% | -2.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.4% | -112.5% |
Valuation Metrics
At 2.8x trailing earnings, LIVE trades at a 92% valuation discount to FND's 36.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LIVE offers better value at 0.29x vs FND's 38.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | FNDFloor & Decor Hol… | LIVELive Ventures Inc… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.4B | $43M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.0B | $251M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 35.98x | 2.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 33.25x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 38.90x | 0.29x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 33.30x | 7.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.59x | 0.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.11x | 0.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 116.18x | 2.04x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LIVE delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $9 for FND. FND carries lower financial leverage with a 0.75x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LIVE's 2.27x.
| Metric | FNDFloor & Decor Hol… | LIVELive Ventures Inc… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.2% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.9% | +5.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.3% | +3.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.2% | +5.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.75x | 2.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.5B | $208M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $249M | $9M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.8B | $216M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 39.46x | 5.01x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in FND five years ago would be worth $7,221 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,740 for LIVE. Over the past 12 months, LIVE leads with a +73.6% total return vs FND's -28.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FND at -9.0% vs LIVE's -24.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FNDFloor & Decor Hol… | LIVELive Ventures Inc… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.7% | -11.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -28.5% | +73.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.7% | -57.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.8% | -42.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +115.6% | +50.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.0% | -24.5% |
Risk & Volatility
LIVE is the less volatile stock with a 0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FND's 1.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FND currently trades 70.3% from its 52-week high vs LIVE's 53.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FNDFloor & Decor Hol… | LIVELive Ventures Inc… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.30x | 0.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $98.24 | $25.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $55.11 | $6.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.3% | +53.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.5 | 30.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 7K |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | FNDFloor & Decor Hol… | LIVELive Ventures Inc… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $76.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 36 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Feb 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Floor & Decor Holdi… (FND) | 100 | 128.58 | +28.6% |
| Live Ventures Incor… (LIVE) | 100 | 384.33 | +284.3% |
Floor & Decor Holdi… (FND) returned -28% over 5 years vs Live Ventures Incor… (LIVE)'s -43%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Floor & Decor Holdi… (FND) | $1.1B | $4.7B | +345.8% |
| Live Ventures Incor… (LIVE) | $79M | $445M | +463.5% |
Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.'s revenue grew from $1.1B (2016) to $4.7B (2025) — a 18.1% CAGR. Live Ventures Incorporated's revenue grew from $79M (2016) to $445M (2025) — a 21.2% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Floor & Decor Holdi… (FND) | 4.1% | 4.5% | +8.7% |
| Live Ventures Incor… (LIVE) | 22.6% | 5.1% | -77.4% |
Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.'s net margin went from 4% (2016) to 4% (2025). Live Ventures Incorporated's net margin went from 23% (2016) to 5% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Floor & Decor Holdi… (FND) | 47.3 | 31.7 | -33.0% |
| Live Ventures Incor… (LIVE) | 9.9 | 3 | -69.7% |
Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. has traded in a 23x–53x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~36x. Live Ventures Incorporated has traded in a 3x–10x P/E range over 6 years; current trailing P/E is ~3x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Floor & Decor Holdi… (FND) | 0.44 | 1.92 | +336.4% |
| Live Ventures Incor… (LIVE) | 5.4 | 4.93 | -8.7% |
Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.'s EPS grew from $0.44 (2016) to $1.92 (2025) — a 18% CAGR. Live Ventures Incorporated's EPS grew from $5.40 (2016) to $4.93 (2025) — a -1% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. generated $64M FCF in 2025 (+160% vs 2021). Live Ventures Incorporated generated $21M FCF in 2025 (+18% vs 2021).
FND vs LIVE: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FND or LIVE a better buy right now?
Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) offers the better valuation at 2.8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND) a "Hold" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FND or LIVE?
On trailing P/E, Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) is the cheapest at 2.8x versus Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. at 36.0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FND or LIVE?
Over the past 5 years, Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND) delivered a total return of -27.8%, compared to -42.6% for Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE). A $10,000 investment in FND five years ago would be worth approximately $7K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FND returned +115.6% versus LIVE's +50.1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FND or LIVE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.48β versus Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.'s 1.30β — meaning FND is approximately 171% more volatile than LIVE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 75% versus 2% for Live Ventures Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — FND or LIVE?
Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) is the more profitable company, earning 5.1% net margin versus 4.5% for Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5.1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FND leads at 5.8% versus 3.3% for LIVE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FND leads at 43.6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — FND or LIVE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is FND or LIVE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.48)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIVE: +50.1%, FND: +115.6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between FND and LIVE?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: FND is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LIVE is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.