Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Foxx Development Holdings Inc. (FOXX) vs UTime Limited (WTO) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FOXX | 19.4% revenue growth vs WTO's 45.8% |
| Quality / Margins | FOXX | -15.3% net margin vs WTO's -67.4% |
| Stability / Safety | WTO | Beta 0.82 vs FOXX's 1.47 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | FOXX | +3.9% vs WTO's -99.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FOXX | -19.3% ROA vs WTO's -36.8% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Foxx Development Holdings is a budget smartphone and tablet brand that sells affordable mobile devices primarily to cost-conscious consumers and first-time users. It generates revenue through device sales — smartphones, tablets, and wearables — distributed via telecom carrier partnerships both online and in physical retail stores. The company's competitive advantage lies in its focus on the budget segment and established distribution relationships with telecom carriers, which provide access to a broad customer base.
UTime Limited is a Chinese consumer electronics company that designs, manufactures, and sells mobile phones and accessories primarily in emerging markets. It generates revenue through device sales under its UTime and Do brands — with a focus on affordable smartphones — and through electronics manufacturing services for other companies. The company's competitive advantage lies in its established manufacturing capabilities and distribution networks across South America, South Asia, Southeast Asia, and Africa.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
FOXX leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Financial Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
WTO is the larger business by revenue, generating $380M annually — 6.0x FOXX's $63M. FOXX is the more profitable business, keeping -15.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WTO's -67.4%. On growth, WTO holds the edge at +64.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FOXXFoxx Development … | WTOUTime Limited |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $63M | $380M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | -$218M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | -$256M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | -$396M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.3% | +8.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -13.9% | -59.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -15.3% | -67.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -10.7% | -104.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.5% | +64.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.4% | -9.0% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FOXXFoxx Development … | WTOUTime Limited |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $36M | $7M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $36M | $1M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.64x | -0.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.55x | 0.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FOXX scores 7/9 vs WTO's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | FOXXFoxx Development … | WTOUTime Limited |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -67.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -19.3% | -36.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -5.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -5.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$676,940 | -$40M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $109M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $69M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.45x | -124.26x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in FOXX five years ago would be worth $5,334 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for WTO. Over the past 12 months, FOXX leads with a +3.9% total return vs WTO's -99.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FOXX at -19.9% vs WTO's -96.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FOXXFoxx Development … | WTOUTime Limited |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.5% | -13.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.9% | -99.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.7% | -100.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.7% | -100.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.7% | -100.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -19.9% | -96.8% |
Risk & Volatility
WTO is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FOXX's 1.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FOXX currently trades 60.2% from its 52-week high vs WTO's 0.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FOXXFoxx Development … | WTOUTime Limited |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.47x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.88 | $1500.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.71 | $0.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.2% | +0.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.3 | 45.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 19K | 286K |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | FOXXFoxx Development … | WTOUTime Limited |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Aug 22 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Foxx Development Ho… (FOXX) | 100 | 49.75 | -50.2% |
| UTime Limited (WTO) | 100 | 0 | -100.0% |
Foxx Development Ho… (FOXX) returned -47% over 5 years vs UTime Limited (WTO)'s -100%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Foxx Development Ho… (FOXX) | $13M | $66M | +411.2% |
| UTime Limited (WTO) | $60M | $251M | +317.8% |
UTime Limited's revenue grew from $60M (2018) to $251M (2025) — a 22.7% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Foxx Development Ho… (FOXX) | 1.1% | -13.7% | -1320.0% |
| UTime Limited (WTO) | -4.8% | -2.7% | +44.5% |
UTime Limited's net margin went from -5% (2018) to -3% (2025).
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Foxx Development Ho… (FOXX) | 0.02 | -1.47 | -7486.9% |
| UTime Limited (WTO) | -209.4 | -20,243.4 | -9567.3% |
UTime Limited's EPS grew from $-209.40 (2018) to $-20243.40 (2025).
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Foxx Development Holdings Inc. generated $-7M FCF in 2025 (-2209% vs 2022). UTime Limited generated $-32M FCF in 2025 (-572% vs 2021).
FOXX vs WTO: Frequently Asked Questions
6 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Which is the better long-term investment — FOXX or WTO?
Over the past 5 years, Foxx Development Holdings Inc. (FOXX) delivered a total return of -46.7%, compared to -100.0% for UTime Limited (WTO). A $10,000 investment in FOXX five years ago would be worth approximately $5K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FOXX returned -46.7% versus WTO's -100.0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
02Which is safer — FOXX or WTO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), UTime Limited (WTO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.82β versus Foxx Development Holdings Inc.'s 1.47β — meaning FOXX is approximately 80% more volatile than WTO relative to the S&P 500.
03Which has better profit margins — FOXX or WTO?
Foxx Development Holdings Inc. (FOXX) is the more profitable company, earning -13.7% net margin versus -267.0% for UTime Limited — meaning it keeps -13.7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FOXX leads at -14.7% versus -264.8% for WTO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FOXX leads at 7.2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
04Which pays a better dividend — FOXX or WTO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
05Is FOXX or WTO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, UTime Limited (WTO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.82)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WTO: -100.0%, FOXX: -46.7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
06What are the main differences between FOXX and WTO?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.