Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT) vs StubHub Holdings, Inc. (STUB) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | STUB | 29.5% revenue growth vs FTFT's -90.1% |
| Quality / Margins | STUB | -72.0% net margin vs FTFT's -15.3% |
| Stability / Safety | FTFT | Beta 0.78 vs STUB's 2.25, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | FTFT | -26.2% vs STUB's -56.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | STUB | -23.5% ROA vs FTFT's -50.9%, ROIC 3.6% vs -141.0% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Future FinTech Group is a diversified technology company operating blockchain-based e-commerce platforms and financial technology services. It generates revenue through shared shopping mall membership fees, fruit product sales, goods sales, and supply chain financing—with its blockchain e-commerce platform Chain Cloud Mall being a core offering. The company's competitive advantage lies in its early integration of blockchain technology into e-commerce and financial services, though its diverse operations across multiple segments create a complex business model.
StubHub operates a global online marketplace for secondary ticket sales to live events — primarily sports, concerts, and theater. It generates revenue primarily through transaction fees charged to both buyers and sellers on each ticket sale. Its key advantage is its massive scale and brand recognition as one of the world's largest secondary ticket platforms, creating network effects that attract both buyers and sellers.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
STUB leads in 4 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Valuation Metrics). FTFT leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
STUB and FTFT operate at a comparable scale, with $1.8B and -$10M in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -72.0% (STUB) to -15.3% (FTFT). On growth, STUB holds the edge at +7.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FTFTFuture FinTech Gr… | STUBStubHub Holdings,… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | -$10M | $1.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$59M | -$1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$28M | -$1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $164M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.9% | +79.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -15.7% | -65.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -15.3% | -72.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.2% | +9.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -74.4% | +7.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +86.4% | -42.1% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FTFTFuture FinTech Gr… | STUBStubHub Holdings,… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $30M | $3.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $26M | $4.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.09x | -63.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.39x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 27.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 13.91x | 1.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.25x | 2.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 12.03x |
Profitability & Efficiency
STUB delivers a -53.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-54 in annual profit, vs $-64 for FTFT. FTFT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STUB's 1.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STUB scores 6/9 vs FTFT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | FTFTFuture FinTech Gr… | STUBStubHub Holdings,… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -63.8% | -53.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -50.9% | -23.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -141.0% | +3.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -121.1% | +3.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 1.69x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | $1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $2.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -816.53x | -7.50x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in STUB five years ago would be worth $4,350 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $52 for FTFT. Over the past 12 months, FTFT leads with a -26.2% total return vs STUB's -56.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STUB at -24.2% vs FTFT's -56.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FTFTFuture FinTech Gr… | STUBStubHub Holdings,… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +98.7% | -33.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.2% | -56.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.6% | -56.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.5% | -56.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | -56.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -56.2% | -24.2% |
Risk & Volatility
FTFT is the less volatile stock with a 0.78 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STUB's 2.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STUB currently trades 34.3% from its 52-week high vs FTFT's 29.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FTFTFuture FinTech Gr… | STUBStubHub Holdings,… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.78x | 2.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.00 | $27.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.56 | $8.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +29.8% | +34.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 32.7 | 39.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 41K | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | FTFTFuture FinTech Gr… | STUBStubHub Holdings,… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $23.56 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Future FinTech Grou… (FTFT) | $86M | $2M | -97.5% |
| StubHub Holdings, I… (STUB) | $212M | $1.8B | +736.7% |
Future FinTech Group Inc.'s revenue grew from $86M (2015) to $2M (2024) — a -33.6% CAGR.
Chart 2Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Future FinTech Grou… (FTFT) | 3.4% | -15.3% | -547.6% |
| StubHub Holdings, I… (STUB) | -29.2% | -0.2% | +99.5% |
Future FinTech Group Inc.'s net margin went from 3% (2015) to -15% (2024).
Chart 3EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Future FinTech Grou… (FTFT) | 43.97 | -15.7 | -135.7% |
| StubHub Holdings, I… (STUB) | -0.17 | -0.15 | +11.8% |
Future FinTech Group Inc.'s EPS grew from $43.97 (2015) to $-15.70 (2024) — a NaN% CAGR.
Chart 4Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Future FinTech Group Inc. generated $-11M FCF in 2024 (+46% vs 2021). StubHub Holdings, Inc. generated $255M FCF in 2024 (+283% vs 2021).
FTFT vs STUB: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FTFT or STUB a better buy right now?
Analysts rate StubHub Holdings, Inc. (STUB) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FTFT or STUB?
Over the past 5 years, StubHub Holdings, Inc. (STUB) delivered a total return of -56.5%, compared to -99.5% for Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT). A $10,000 investment in STUB five years ago would be worth approximately $4K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STUB returned -56.5% versus FTFT's -99.2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FTFT or STUB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.78β versus StubHub Holdings, Inc.'s 2.25β — meaning STUB is approximately 187% more volatile than FTFT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 169% for StubHub Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — FTFT or STUB?
StubHub Holdings, Inc. (STUB) is the more profitable company, earning -0.2% net margin versus -1527.2% for Future FinTech Group Inc. — meaning it keeps -0.2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STUB leads at 7.8% versus -1571.4% for FTFT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STUB leads at 81.1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — FTFT or STUB?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is FTFT or STUB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.78)). StubHub Holdings, Inc. (STUB) carries a higher beta of 2.25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FTFT: -99.2%, STUB: -56.5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between FTFT and STUB?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.