Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) vs Groupon, Inc. (GRPN) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FVRR | 10.1% revenue growth vs GRPN's -4.3% |
| Value | FVRR | Lower P/E (5.1x vs 16.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | FVRR | 4.9% net margin vs GRPN's -28.5% |
| Stability / Safety | FVRR | Beta 1.00 vs GRPN's 1.10, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | GRPN | +13.5% vs FVRR's -59.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FVRR | 3.1% ROA vs GRPN's -23.3%, ROIC -0.2% vs 8.1% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Fiverr operates a global online marketplace connecting freelancers with businesses seeking digital services. It generates revenue primarily through transaction fees — taking a commission on each service sold — supplemented by subscription services and business solutions for larger clients. Its competitive advantage lies in its extensive network of freelancers across hundreds of service categories and its platform's ease of use, which creates strong network effects.
Groupon operates an online marketplace that connects consumers with local merchants offering deals and discounts. It makes money primarily by taking a commission — typically 30-50% — on each deal sold through its platform, with additional revenue from direct sales of first-party inventory. The company's key advantage is its established network of millions of users and thousands of local merchants, creating a two-sided marketplace that's difficult for new entrants to replicate at scale.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
FVRR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). GRPN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
GRPN and FVRR operate at a comparable scale, with $496M and $431M in trailing revenue. FVRR is the more profitable business, keeping 4.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GRPN's -28.5%. On growth, GRPN holds the edge at +7.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FVRRFiverr Internatio… | GRPNGroupon, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $431M | $496M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $14M | $41M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $21M | -$142M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $110M | $60M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +81.2% | +90.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.3% | +4.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.9% | -28.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.4% | +12.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.4% | +7.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.1% | -10.4% |
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, GRPN's 16.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FVRR's 19.6x.
| Metric | FVRRFiverr Internatio… | GRPNGroupon, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $388M | $644M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $265M | $668M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.34x | -8.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 5.08x | 16.68x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.57x | 16.84x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.90x | 1.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.98x | 12.04x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.73x | 16.12x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FVRR delivers a 5.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-160 for GRPN. FVRR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GRPN's 6.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FVRR scores 8/9 vs GRPN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | FVRRFiverr Internatio… | GRPNGroupon, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.1% | -159.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.1% | -23.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.2% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.3% | +3.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 6.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$124M | $24M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $129M | $229M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $253M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -6.09x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in GRPN five years ago would be worth $2,194 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $374 for FVRR. Over the past 12 months, GRPN leads with a +13.5% total return vs FVRR's -59.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GRPN at 18.9% vs FVRR's -35.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FVRRFiverr Internatio… | GRPNGroupon, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -45.0% | -27.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -59.7% | +13.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.7% | +68.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.3% | -78.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.9% | -86.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -35.1% | +18.9% |
Risk & Volatility
FVRR is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GRPN's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | FVRRFiverr Internatio… | GRPNGroupon, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.13 | $43.08 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.25 | $9.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +31.7% | +29.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 30.4 | 42.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 848K |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FVRR as "Hold" and GRPN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 100.1% upside for GRPN (target: $25) vs 72.8% for FVRR (target: $19).
| Metric | FVRRFiverr Internatio… | GRPNGroupon, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.71 | $25.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.4% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fiverr Internationa… (FVRR) | 100 | 52.81 | -47.2% |
| Groupon, Inc. (GRPN) | 100 | 60.04 | -40.0% |
Groupon, Inc. (GRPN) returned -78% over 5 years vs Fiverr Internationa… (FVRR)'s -96%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fiverr Internationa… (FVRR) | $52M | $431M | +726.9% |
| Groupon, Inc. (GRPN) | $3.1B | $493M | -84.3% |
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fiverr Internationa… (FVRR) | -37.1% | 4.9% | +113.1% |
| Groupon, Inc. (GRPN) | -6.2% | -12.0% | -93.6% |
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 3 Years
| Stock | 2023 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fiverr Internationa… (FVRR) | 289.6 | 35.3 | -87.8% |
Fiverr International Ltd. has traded in a 35x–290x P/E range over 3 years; current trailing P/E is ~19x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fiverr Internationa… (FVRR) | -0.75 | 0.56 | +174.7% |
| Groupon, Inc. (GRPN) | -6.75 | -1.51 | +77.6% |
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Fiverr International Ltd. generated $104M FCF in 2025 (+193% vs 2021). Groupon, Inc. generated $40M FCF in 2024 (+123% vs 2021).
FVRR vs GRPN: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FVRR or GRPN a better buy right now?
Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) offers the better valuation at 19.3x trailing P/E (5.1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) a "Hold" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FVRR or GRPN?
On forward P/E, Fiverr International Ltd. is actually cheaper at 5.1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FVRR or GRPN?
Over the past 5 years, Groupon, Inc. (GRPN) delivered a total return of -78.1%, compared to -96.3% for Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR). A $10,000 investment in GRPN five years ago would be worth approximately $2K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FVRR returned -72.9% versus GRPN's -86.8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FVRR or GRPN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) is the lower-risk stock at 1.00β versus Groupon, Inc.'s 1.10β — meaning GRPN is approximately 10% more volatile than FVRR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 6% for Groupon, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — FVRR or GRPN?
Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) is the more profitable company, earning 4.9% net margin versus -12.0% for Groupon, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GRPN leads at 1.8% versus -0.3% for FVRR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GRPN leads at 90.2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is FVRR or GRPN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) trades at 5.1x forward P/E versus 16.7x for Groupon, Inc. — 11.6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GRPN: 100.1% to $25.25.
07Which pays a better dividend — FVRR or GRPN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is FVRR or GRPN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.00)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FVRR: -72.9%, GRPN: -86.8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FVRR and GRPN?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 5%
- Gross Margin > 54%