Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) vs Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (Z) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | Z | 15.5% revenue growth vs FVRR's 10.1% |
| Value | FVRR | Lower P/E (5.1x vs 20.4x) |
| Quality / Margins | FVRR | 4.9% net margin vs Z's -1.3% |
| Stability / Safety | FVRR | Beta 1.00 vs Z's 1.12, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | Z | -41.8% vs FVRR's -59.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FVRR | 3.1% ROA vs Z's -0.6%, ROIC -0.2% vs -0.6% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Fiverr operates a global online marketplace connecting freelancers with businesses seeking digital services. It generates revenue primarily through transaction fees — taking a commission on each service sold — supplemented by subscription services and business solutions for larger clients. Its competitive advantage lies in its extensive network of freelancers across hundreds of service categories and its platform's ease of use, which creates strong network effects.
Zillow Group is a digital real estate marketplace that connects home buyers, sellers, renters, and real estate professionals through its platform. It generates revenue primarily from real estate agent advertising and services (its IMT segment), home flipping operations (its Homes segment), and mortgage origination services. The company's key advantage is its massive network effect—with the most comprehensive property database and the largest audience of real estate consumers in the U.S., which attracts more agents and listings in a virtuous cycle.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
FVRR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Valuation Metrics). Z leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
Z is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 5.8x FVRR's $431M. FVRR is the more profitable business, keeping 4.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to Z's -1.3%. On growth, Z holds the edge at +16.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FVRRFiverr Internatio… | ZZillow Group, Inc… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $431M | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $14M | $187M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $21M | -$32M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $110M | $264M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +81.2% | +74.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.3% | -3.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.9% | -1.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.4% | +10.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.4% | +16.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.1% | +145.3% |
Valuation Metrics
At 19.3x trailing earnings, FVRR trades at a 96% valuation discount to Z's 495.8x P/E.
| Metric | FVRRFiverr Internatio… | ZZillow Group, Inc… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $388M | $10.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $265M | $10.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.34x | 495.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 5.08x | 20.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.57x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.90x | 4.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.98x | 2.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.73x | 45.65x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FVRR delivers a 5.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-1 for Z. FVRR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to Z's 0.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FVRR scores 8/9 vs Z's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | FVRRFiverr Internatio… | ZZillow Group, Inc… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.1% | -0.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.1% | -0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.2% | -0.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.3% | -0.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$124M | -$675M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $129M | $768M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $93M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -0.38x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in Z five years ago would be worth $2,672 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $374 for FVRR. Over the past 12 months, Z leads with a -41.8% total return vs FVRR's -59.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors Z at 2.0% vs FVRR's -35.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FVRRFiverr Internatio… | ZZillow Group, Inc… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -45.0% | -32.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -59.7% | -41.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.7% | +6.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.3% | -73.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.9% | +106.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -35.1% | +2.0% |
Risk & Volatility
FVRR is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than Z's 1.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. Z currently trades 47.5% from its 52-week high vs FVRR's 31.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FVRRFiverr Internatio… | ZZillow Group, Inc… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.13 | $93.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.25 | $41.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +31.7% | +47.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 30.4 | 34.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 3.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FVRR as "Hold" and Z as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 90.5% upside for Z (target: $85) vs 72.8% for FVRR (target: $19).
| Metric | FVRRFiverr Internatio… | ZZillow Group, Inc… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.71 | $85.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.4% | +6.2% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fiverr Internationa… (FVRR) | 100 | 49.21 | -50.8% |
| Zillow Group, Inc. … (Z) | 100 | 114.93 | +14.9% |
Zillow Group, Inc. … (Z) returned -73% over 5 years vs Fiverr Internationa… (FVRR)'s -96%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fiverr Internationa… (FVRR) | $52M | $431M | +726.9% |
| Zillow Group, Inc. … (Z) | $847M | $2.6B | +205.1% |
Zillow Group, Inc. Class C's revenue grew from $847M (2016) to $2.6B (2025) — a 13.2% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fiverr Internationa… (FVRR) | -37.1% | 4.9% | +113.1% |
| Zillow Group, Inc. … (Z) | -26.0% | 0.9% | +103.4% |
Zillow Group, Inc. Class C's net margin went from -26% (2016) to 1% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 3 Years
| Stock | 2023 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fiverr Internationa… (FVRR) | 289.6 | 35.3 | -87.8% |
Fiverr International Ltd. has traded in a 35x–290x P/E range over 3 years; current trailing P/E is ~19x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fiverr Internationa… (FVRR) | -0.75 | 0.56 | +174.7% |
| Zillow Group, Inc. … (Z) | -1.22 | 0.09 | +107.4% |
Zillow Group, Inc. Class C's EPS grew from $-1.22 (2016) to $0.09 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Fiverr International Ltd. generated $104M FCF in 2025 (+193% vs 2021). Zillow Group, Inc. Class C generated $235M FCF in 2025 (+107% vs 2021).
FVRR vs Z: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FVRR or Z a better buy right now?
Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) offers the better valuation at 19.3x trailing P/E (5.1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) a "Hold" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FVRR or Z?
On trailing P/E, Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) is the cheapest at 19.3x versus Zillow Group, Inc. Class C at 495.8x. On forward P/E, Fiverr International Ltd. is actually cheaper at 5.1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FVRR or Z?
Over the past 5 years, Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (Z) delivered a total return of -73.3%, compared to -96.3% for Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR). A $10,000 investment in Z five years ago would be worth approximately $3K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: Z returned +106.6% versus FVRR's -72.9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FVRR or Z?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) is the lower-risk stock at 1.00β versus Zillow Group, Inc. Class C's 1.12β — meaning Z is approximately 12% more volatile than FVRR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for Zillow Group, Inc. Class C — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — FVRR or Z?
Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) is the more profitable company, earning 4.9% net margin versus 0.9% for Zillow Group, Inc. Class C — meaning it keeps 4.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FVRR leads at -0.3% versus -1.3% for Z. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FVRR leads at 80.7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is FVRR or Z more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) trades at 5.1x forward P/E versus 20.4x for Zillow Group, Inc. Class C — 15.3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for Z: 90.5% to $85.00.
07Which pays a better dividend — FVRR or Z?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is FVRR or Z better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (Z) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.12), +106.6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (Z: +106.6%, FVRR: -72.9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FVRR and Z?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 8%
- Gross Margin > 44%