Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare GIBO Holdings Limited (GIBO) vs Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Value | MOMO | Lower P/E (1.1x vs 34.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | MOMO | 8.2% net margin vs GIBO's -40.2% |
| Stability / Safety | GIBO | Lower D/E ratio (1.4% vs 40.1%) |
| Dividends | MOMO | 8.5% yield; GIBO pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | MOMO | -12.0% vs GIBO's -99.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MOMO | 5.2% ROA vs GIBO's -10.7%, ROIC 11.2% vs -43.3% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
GIBO Holdings Limited is an AI-driven animation streaming platform serving young audiences with both viewing and creation tools. It generates revenue primarily through subscription fees and advertising on its streaming service — though specific segment breakdowns aren't publicly detailed. The company's key advantage lies in its AI-powered content generation tools that lower animation creation barriers, potentially creating network effects between creators and viewers.
Hello Group operates China's leading mobile social and entertainment platforms — primarily Momo and Tantan — that connect users through location-based matching, live streaming, and dating services. It generates revenue mainly from virtual gifting in live streaming (where viewers buy digital gifts for creators), premium subscriptions for enhanced features, and mobile marketing services. The company's competitive moat lies in its massive user network effects within China's social entertainment ecosystem and its deep understanding of local user preferences for interactive, video-based social experiences.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
MOMO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Total Returns). GIBO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
MOMO is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.5B annually — 348.4x GIBO's $30M. MOMO is the more profitable business, keeping 8.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GIBO's -40.2%.
| Metric | GIBOGIBO Holdings Lim… | MOMOHello Group Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $30M | $10.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$20M | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | $854M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$198,130 | $1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +85.4% | +37.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -82.8% | +12.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -40.2% | +8.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.7% | +11.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.4% | -139.6% |
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, MOMO trades at a 77% valuation discount to GIBO's 34.7x P/E.
| Metric | GIBOGIBO Holdings Lim… | MOMOHello Group Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4M | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5M | $2.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 34.72x | 8.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 1.14x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.13x | 1.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.11x | 0.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 11.40x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MOMO delivers a 7.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-14 for GIBO. GIBO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MOMO's 0.40x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GIBO scores 7/9 vs MOMO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | GIBOGIBO Holdings Lim… | MOMOHello Group Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -14.1% | +7.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -10.7% | +5.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -43.3% | +11.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -53.9% | +11.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.40x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1M | $459M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $86,750 | $4.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $4.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 14.22x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in MOMO five years ago would be worth $5,960 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7 for GIBO. Over the past 12 months, MOMO leads with a -12.0% total return vs GIBO's -99.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MOMO at -3.0% vs GIBO's -91.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | GIBOGIBO Holdings Lim… | MOMOHello Group Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -32.5% | -2.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.9% | -12.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -8.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -40.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -9.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -91.1% | -3.0% |
Risk & Volatility
GIBO is the less volatile stock with a -0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MOMO's 0.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MOMO currently trades 71.8% from its 52-week high vs GIBO's 0.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | GIBOGIBO Holdings Lim… | MOMOHello Group Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.42x | 0.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4836.00 | $9.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.33 | $5.12 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.0% | +71.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.4 | 50.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 842K |
Analyst Outlook
MOMO is the only dividend payer here at 8.47% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | GIBOGIBO Holdings Lim… | MOMOHello Group Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +8.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.83 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +100.0% | +7.8% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Sep 23 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| GIBO Holdings Limit… (GIBO) | 100 | 0.07 | -99.9% |
| Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) | 100 | 93.41 | -6.6% |
Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) returned -40% over 5 years vs GIBO Holdings Limit… (GIBO)'s -100%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| GIBO Holdings Limit… (GIBO) | $0.00 | $30M | — |
| Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) | $870M | $10.6B | +1114.4% |
Hello Group Inc.'s revenue grew from $870M (2015) to $10.6B (2024) — a 32.0% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| GIBO Holdings Limit… (GIBO) | 0.9% | 0.9% | +0.0% |
| Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) | 10.2% | 9.8% | -3.7% |
Hello Group Inc.'s net margin went from 10% (2015) to 10% (2024).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 7 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) | 2.4 | 1.4 | -41.7% |
Hello Group Inc. has traded in a 1x–3x P/E range over 7 years; current trailing P/E is ~8x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| GIBO Holdings Limit… (GIBO) | -0.02 | 0.04 | +362.2% |
| Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) | 0.39 | 5.58 | +1330.8% |
Hello Group Inc.'s EPS grew from $0.39 (2015) to $5.58 (2024) — a 34% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
GIBO Holdings Limited generated $-6M FCF in 2024 (+50% vs 2022). Hello Group Inc. generated $1B FCF in 2024 (-7% vs 2021).
GIBO vs MOMO: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GIBO or MOMO a better buy right now?
Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) offers the better valuation at 8.1x trailing P/E (1.1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GIBO or MOMO?
On trailing P/E, Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) is the cheapest at 8.1x versus GIBO Holdings Limited at 34.7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GIBO or MOMO?
Over the past 5 years, Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) delivered a total return of -40.4%, compared to -99.9% for GIBO Holdings Limited (GIBO). A $10,000 investment in MOMO five years ago would be worth approximately $6K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MOMO returned -9.5% versus GIBO's -99.9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GIBO or MOMO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), GIBO Holdings Limited (GIBO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.42β versus Hello Group Inc.'s 0.46β — meaning MOMO is approximately -209% more volatile than GIBO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, GIBO Holdings Limited (GIBO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 40% for Hello Group Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — GIBO or MOMO?
Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) is the more profitable company, earning 9.8% net margin versus 0.9% for GIBO Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 9.8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MOMO leads at 14.5% versus -82.9% for GIBO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GIBO leads at 85.4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — GIBO or MOMO?
In this comparison, MOMO (8.5% yield) pays a dividend. GIBO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is GIBO or MOMO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, GIBO Holdings Limited (GIBO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.42)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GIBO: -99.9%, MOMO: -9.5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between GIBO and MOMO?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: GIBO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MOMO is a small-cap deep-value stock. MOMO pays a dividend while GIBO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 5%
- Dividend Yield > 3.3%