Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Getty Realty Corp. (GTY) vs Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | PINE | 15.9% revenue growth vs GTY's 9.0% |
| Value | GTY | Lower P/E (24.2x vs 49.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | GTY | 34.8% net margin vs PINE's -5.3% |
| Stability / Safety | GTY | Beta 0.15 vs PINE's 0.25 |
| Dividends | PINE | 0.2% yield; GTY pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | PINE | +25.8% vs GTY's +10.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | GTY | 3.6% ROA vs PINE's -0.4%, ROIC 4.6% vs 2.2% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Getty Realty Corp. is a real estate investment trust that owns and leases convenience store and gasoline station properties across the United States. It generates revenue primarily through long-term triple-net leases—where tenants pay rent plus property expenses—with convenience store operators and fuel retailers. The company's competitive advantage lies in its specialized portfolio of essential retail properties with high traffic locations and long-term leases to creditworthy tenants.
Alpine Income Property Trust is a real estate investment trust that acquires and operates single-tenant commercial properties leased to creditworthy tenants under long-term net lease agreements. It generates revenue primarily through rental income from its portfolio of retail and commercial properties — with over 90% of its properties occupied by national or regional tenants. The company's moat lies in its focus on essential-service retail properties with long-term leases to recession-resistant tenants, providing stable cash flows.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
GTY leads in 4 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). PINE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
GTY is the larger business by revenue, generating $214M annually — 3.5x PINE's $61M. GTY is the more profitable business, keeping 34.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PINE's -5.3%. On growth, PINE holds the edge at +22.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | GTYGetty Realty Corp. | PINEAlpine Income Pro… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $214M | $61M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $182M | $41M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $74M | -$3M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $129M | -$4M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +88.3% | +85.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +55.4% | +21.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +34.8% | -5.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +60.4% | -6.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.0% | +22.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +48.1% | +190.4% |
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PINE's 7.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GTY's 15.8x.
| Metric | GTYGetty Realty Corp. | PINEAlpine Income Pro… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.9B | $292M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.9B | $287M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.44x | -89.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.20x | 49.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.80x | 7.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.55x | 4.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.73x | 0.95x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.92x | 11.32x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GTY delivers a 7.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-1 for PINE. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GTY scores 4/9 vs PINE's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | GTYGetty Realty Corp. | PINEAlpine Income Pro… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.4% | -1.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.6% | -0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.6% | +2.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.9% | +2.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.95x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.0B | -$5M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $13M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.0B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.63x | — |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in GTY five years ago would be worth $14,572 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,697 for PINE. Over the past 12 months, PINE leads with a +25.8% total return vs GTY's +10.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PINE at 8.2% vs GTY's 3.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | GTYGetty Realty Corp. | PINEAlpine Income Pro… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.1% | +17.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.6% | +25.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.5% | +26.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.7% | +37.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +163.5% | +37.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.7% | +8.2% |
Risk & Volatility
GTY is the less volatile stock with a 0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PINE's 0.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GTY currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs PINE's 94.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | GTYGetty Realty Corp. | PINEAlpine Income Pro… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.15x | 0.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $33.54 | $20.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.39 | $13.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.9% | +94.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.1 | 61.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 434K | 136K |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GTY as "Buy" and PINE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.0% upside for PINE (target: $21) vs 0.5% for GTY (target: $33). PINE is the only dividend payer here at 0.18% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | GTYGetty Realty Corp. | PINEAlpine Income Pro… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $33.00 | $20.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Getty Realty Corp. (GTY) | 100 | 102.31 | +2.3% |
| Alpine Income Prope… (PINE) | 100 | 97.68 | -2.3% |
Getty Realty Corp. (GTY) returned +46% over 5 years vs Alpine Income Prope… (PINE)'s +37%. A $10,000 investment in GTY 5 years ago would be worth $14,572 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Getty Realty Corp. (GTY) | $115M | $222M | +92.4% |
| Alpine Income Prope… (PINE) | $8M | $61M | +616.0% |
Getty Realty Corp.'s revenue grew from $115M (2016) to $222M (2025) — a 7.5% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Getty Realty Corp. (GTY) | 33.3% | 35.7% | +7.2% |
| Alpine Income Prope… (PINE) | 33.3% | -5.3% | -115.9% |
Getty Realty Corp.'s net margin went from 33% (2016) to 36% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Getty Realty Corp. (GTY) | 21.6 | 19.6 | -9.3% |
| Alpine Income Prope… (PINE) | 42.3 | 119.9 | +183.5% |
Getty Realty Corp. has traded in a 17x–76x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~23x. Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. has traded in a 9x–136x P/E range over 6 years; current trailing P/E is ~-90x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Getty Realty Corp. (GTY) | 1.12 | 1.4 | +25.0% |
| Alpine Income Prope… (PINE) | 0.31 | -0.22 | -171.0% |
Getty Realty Corp.'s EPS grew from $1.12 (2016) to $1.40 (2025) — a 3% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Getty Realty Corp. generated $127M FCF in 2025 (+47% vs 2021). Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. generated $26M FCF in 2025 (+50% vs 2021).
GTY vs PINE: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GTY or PINE a better buy right now?
Getty Realty Corp. (GTY) offers the better valuation at 23.4x trailing P/E (24.2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Getty Realty Corp. (GTY) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GTY or PINE?
On forward P/E, Getty Realty Corp. is actually cheaper at 24.2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GTY or PINE?
Over the past 5 years, Getty Realty Corp. (GTY) delivered a total return of +45.7%, compared to +37.0% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE). A $10,000 investment in GTY five years ago would be worth approximately $15K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GTY returned +163.5% versus PINE's +37.1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GTY or PINE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Getty Realty Corp. (GTY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.15β versus Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.'s 0.25β — meaning PINE is approximately 64% more volatile than GTY relative to the S&P 500.
05Which has better profit margins — GTY or PINE?
Getty Realty Corp. (GTY) is the more profitable company, earning 35.7% net margin versus -5.3% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 35.7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GTY leads at 54.9% versus 21.7% for PINE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PINE leads at 86.9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is GTY or PINE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Getty Realty Corp. (GTY) trades at 24.2x forward P/E versus 49.8x for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. — 25.6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PINE: 4.0% to $20.50.
07Which pays a better dividend — GTY or PINE?
In this comparison, PINE (0.2% yield) pays a dividend. GTY does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is GTY or PINE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Getty Realty Corp. (GTY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.15), +163.5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTY: +163.5%, PINE: +37.1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between GTY and PINE?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.