Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) vs The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | HUT | 44.8% revenue growth vs SCHW's 1.9% |
| Quality / Margins | SCHW | 22.9% net margin vs HUT's -96.2% |
| Stability / Safety | SCHW | Beta 0.88 vs HUT's 2.67 |
| Dividends | SCHW | 1.3% yield; HUT pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | HUT | +260.9% vs SCHW's +21.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SCHW | 232.8% ROA vs HUT's -8.2%, ROIC 6.0% vs -14.0% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Hut 8 is a vertically integrated Bitcoin mining company that operates large-scale data centers powered by energy infrastructure. It generates revenue primarily from Bitcoin mining rewards — converting electricity into digital assets — with additional income from high-performance computing services. The company's key advantage is its vertically integrated model combining energy infrastructure ownership with mining operations, which provides cost control and operational efficiency.
Charles Schwab is a major financial services firm that operates as a discount brokerage, wealth manager, and bank for individual investors and financial advisors. It generates revenue primarily from net interest income on client cash balances (roughly 50%), asset management fees on its proprietary funds and advisory services, and trading commissions. The company's key competitive advantage is its massive scale in client assets—over $8 trillion—which creates a powerful network effect and allows it to offer low-cost services while maintaining profitability.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
SCHW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). HUT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
SCHW is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.0B annually — 110.6x HUT's $235M. SCHW is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HUT's -96.2%.
| Metric | HUTHut 8 Corp. | SCHWThe Charles Schwa… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $235M | $26.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$220M | $12.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$226M | $8.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$342M | $9.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +91.3% | +75.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -136.9% | +29.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -96.2% | +22.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -145.5% | +7.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.5% | +41.5% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | HUTHut 8 Corp. | SCHWThe Charles Schwa… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.9B | $169.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.2B | $172.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -24.87x | 31.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 16.22x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 13.91x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 18.87x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 24.92x | 6.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.32x | 3.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 82.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SCHW delivers a 2.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-13 for HUT. HUT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SCHW's 0.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SCHW scores 7/9 vs HUT's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | HUTHut 8 Corp. | SCHWThe Charles Schwa… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -13.4% | +2.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.2% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -14.0% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -17.2% | +9.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.25x | 0.93x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $384M | $3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $45M | $42.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $429M | $45.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.71x | 3.05x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in SCHW five years ago would be worth $15,597 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,764 for HUT. Over the past 12 months, HUT leads with a +260.9% total return vs SCHW's +21.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HUT at 86.2% vs SCHW's 8.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | HUTHut 8 Corp. | SCHWThe Charles Schwa… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.8% | -6.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +260.9% | +21.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +545.2% | +26.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.6% | +56.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +195.9% | +309.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +86.2% | +8.1% |
Risk & Volatility
SCHW is the less volatile stock with a 0.88 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HUT's 2.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SCHW currently trades 88.6% from its 52-week high vs HUT's 80.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | HUTHut 8 Corp. | SCHWThe Charles Schwa… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.67x | 0.88x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $66.07 | $107.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.04 | $65.88 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.6% | +88.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.1 | 48.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.7M | 9.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates HUT as "Buy" and SCHW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.7% upside for HUT (target: $70) vs 29.0% for SCHW (target: $123). SCHW is the only dividend payer here at 1.30% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | HUTHut 8 Corp. | SCHWThe Charles Schwa… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $70.10 | $122.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 50 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) | 100 | 1,248.44 | +1148.4% |
| The Charles Schwab … (SCHW) | 100 | 274.6 | +174.6% |
The Charles Schwab … (SCHW) returned +56% over 5 years vs Hut 8 Corp. (HUT)'s +18%. A $10,000 investment in SCHW 5 years ago would be worth $15,597 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) | $0.00 | $235M | — |
| The Charles Schwab … (SCHW) | $7.6B | $26.0B | +239.9% |
Hut 8 Corp.'s revenue grew from $0M (2016) to $235M (2025) — a 0.0% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) | 8.4% | -96.2% | -1243.1% |
| The Charles Schwab … (SCHW) | 24.7% | 22.9% | -7.5% |
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 8 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) | 39.2 | 6 | -84.7% |
| The Charles Schwab … (SCHW) | 31.9 | 24.8 | -22.3% |
Hut 8 Corp. has traded in a 6x–39x P/E range over 4 years; current trailing P/E is ~-25x. The Charles Schwab Corporation has traded in a 17x–32x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~32x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) | -9.32 | -2.14 | +77.0% |
| The Charles Schwab … (SCHW) | 1.31 | 2.99 | +128.2% |
Hut 8 Corp.'s EPS grew from $-9.32 (2016) to $-2.14 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Hut 8 Corp. generated $-342M FCF in 2025 (-105% vs 2021). The Charles Schwab Corporation generated $2B FCF in 2024 (+71% vs 2021).
HUT vs SCHW: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HUT or SCHW a better buy right now?
The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW) offers the better valuation at 31.8x trailing P/E (16.2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — HUT or SCHW?
Over the past 5 years, The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW) delivered a total return of +56.0%, compared to +17.6% for Hut 8 Corp. (HUT). A $10,000 investment in SCHW five years ago would be worth approximately $16K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SCHW returned +309.4% versus HUT's +195.9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — HUT or SCHW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW) is the lower-risk stock at 0.88β versus Hut 8 Corp.'s 2.67β — meaning HUT is approximately 204% more volatile than SCHW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 93% for The Charles Schwab Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — HUT or SCHW?
The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW) is the more profitable company, earning 22.9% net margin versus -96.2% for Hut 8 Corp. — meaning it keeps 22.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SCHW leads at 29.6% versus -136.9% for HUT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HUT leads at 91.3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Is HUT or SCHW more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HUT: 31.7% to $70.10.
06Which pays a better dividend — HUT or SCHW?
In this comparison, SCHW (1.3% yield) pays a dividend. HUT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is HUT or SCHW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.88), 1.3% yield, +309.4% 10Y return). Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) carries a higher beta of 2.67 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SCHW: +309.4%, HUT: +195.9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between HUT and SCHW?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. SCHW pays a dividend while HUT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.