Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Triller Group Inc. (ILLRW) vs Trump Media & Technology Group Corp. (DJT) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ILLRW | -4.5% revenue growth vs DJT's -12.4% |
| Quality / Margins | ILLRW | -7.8% net margin vs DJT's -39.2% |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | ILLRW | -46.4% vs DJT's -55.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | DJT | -4.4% ROA vs ILLRW's -325.1%, ROIC -38.1% vs -164.1% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Triller operates an AI-powered short-form video platform that enables creators and brands to build direct relationships with audiences. It generates revenue primarily through advertising on its platform — including in-stream video ads and brand partnerships — along with content production and commerce integrations. The company's key advantage lies in its AI-driven content curation and creator tools that differentiate it from larger competitors in the social video space.
Trump Media & Technology Group operates Truth Social, a social media platform positioned as an alternative to mainstream networks with a focus on free speech. It generates revenue primarily through advertising on its platform — though still in early growth stages — and has plans for subscription services and other digital offerings. Its key advantage is its strong brand association with Donald Trump and his political movement, which creates a dedicated user base less sensitive to competitive pressures.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
ILLRW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Total Returns). DJT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
ILLRW is the larger business by revenue, generating $38M annually — 10.4x DJT's $4M. ILLRW is the more profitable business, keeping -7.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DJT's -39.2%. On growth, DJT holds the edge at -3.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ILLRWTriller Group Inc. | DJTTrump Media & Tec… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $38M | $4M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$211M | -$178M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$297M | -$144M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$29M | -$6M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.8% | +59.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.0% | -50.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.8% | -39.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -76.0% | -170.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -62.7% | -3.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.1% | -108.8% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ILLRWTriller Group Inc. | DJTTrump Media & Tec… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | — | $3.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | — | $2.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.04x | -4.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 818.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DJT scores 4/9 vs ILLRW's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ILLRWTriller Group Inc. | DJTTrump Media & Tec… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -6.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.3% | -4.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -164.1% | -38.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.0% | -43.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $180M | -$157M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $170M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $182M | $13M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -17.30x | -8.02x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in ILLRW five years ago would be worth $2,747 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,118 for DJT. Over the past 12 months, ILLRW leads with a -46.4% total return vs DJT's -55.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ILLRW at -35.0% vs DJT's -40.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ILLRWTriller Group Inc. | DJTTrump Media & Tec… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +72.0% | -22.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -46.4% | -55.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.5% | -78.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.5% | -78.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.5% | -78.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -35.0% | -40.4% |
Risk & Volatility
ILLRW is the less volatile stock with a -0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DJT's 1.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ILLRW currently trades 42.1% from its 52-week high vs DJT's 38.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ILLRWTriller Group Inc. | DJTTrump Media & Tec… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.72x | 1.72x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.14 | $27.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.01 | $9.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +42.1% | +38.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.7 | 42.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 49K | 5.9M |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ILLRWTriller Group Inc. | DJTTrump Media & Tec… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | — | +0.1% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Oct 24 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Triller Group Inc. (ILLRW) | 100 | 15.97 | -84.0% |
| Trump Media & Techn… (DJT) | 100 | 47.51 | -52.5% |
Triller Group Inc. (ILLRW) returned -73% over 5 years vs Trump Media & Techn… (DJT)'s -79%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2019 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Triller Group Inc. (ILLRW) | $0.00 | $46M | — |
| Trump Media & Techn… (DJT) | $0.00 | $4M | — |
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2020 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Triller Group Inc. (ILLRW) | -20.6% | -6.5% | +68.6% |
| Trump Media & Techn… (DJT) | 34.4% | -110.8% | -422.4% |
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2019 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Triller Group Inc. (ILLRW) | 0.05 | -1.56 | -3232.5% |
| Trump Media & Techn… (DJT) | -0.59 | -2.36 | -300.0% |
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Triller Group Inc. generated $-44M FCF in 2023 (+75% vs 2021). Trump Media & Technology Group Corp. generated $-66M FCF in 2024 (-1608% vs 2021).
ILLRW vs DJT: Frequently Asked Questions
6 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Which is the better long-term investment — ILLRW or DJT?
Over the past 5 years, Triller Group Inc. (ILLRW) delivered a total return of -72.5%, compared to -78.8% for Trump Media & Technology Group Corp. (DJT). A $10,000 investment in ILLRW five years ago would be worth approximately $3K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ILLRW returned -72.5% versus DJT's -78.8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
02Which is safer — ILLRW or DJT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Triller Group Inc. (ILLRW) is the lower-risk stock at -0.72β versus Trump Media & Technology Group Corp.'s 1.72β — meaning DJT is approximately -340% more volatile than ILLRW relative to the S&P 500.
03Which has better profit margins — ILLRW or DJT?
Triller Group Inc. (ILLRW) is the more profitable company, earning -647.0% net margin versus -110.8% for Trump Media & Technology Group Corp. — meaning it keeps -647.0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ILLRW leads at -572.3% versus -51.4% for DJT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DJT leads at 82.9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
04Which pays a better dividend — ILLRW or DJT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
05Is ILLRW or DJT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Triller Group Inc. (ILLRW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.72)). Trump Media & Technology Group Corp. (DJT) carries a higher beta of 1.72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ILLRW: -72.5%, DJT: -78.8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
06What are the main differences between ILLRW and DJT?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.