Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Triller Group Inc. (ILLRW) vs Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ILLRW | -4.5% revenue growth vs MOMO's -12.0% |
| Quality / Margins | MOMO | 8.2% net margin vs ILLRW's -7.8% |
| Dividends | MOMO | 8.6% yield; ILLRW pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | MOMO | -8.4% vs ILLRW's -46.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MOMO | 5.2% ROA vs ILLRW's -325.1%, ROIC 11.2% vs -164.1% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Triller operates an AI-powered short-form video platform that enables creators and brands to build direct relationships with audiences. It generates revenue primarily through advertising on its platform — including in-stream video ads and brand partnerships — along with content production and commerce integrations. The company's key advantage lies in its AI-driven content curation and creator tools that differentiate it from larger competitors in the social video space.
Hello Group operates China's leading mobile social and entertainment platforms — primarily Momo and Tantan — that connect users through location-based matching, live streaming, and dating services. It generates revenue mainly from virtual gifting in live streaming (where viewers buy digital gifts for creators), premium subscriptions for enhanced features, and mobile marketing services. The company's competitive moat lies in its massive user network effects within China's social entertainment ecosystem and its deep understanding of local user preferences for interactive, video-based social experiences.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
MOMO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). ILLRW leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
MOMO is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.5B annually — 274.5x ILLRW's $38M. MOMO is the more profitable business, keeping 8.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ILLRW's -7.8%. On growth, MOMO holds the edge at -2.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ILLRWTriller Group Inc. | MOMOHello Group Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $38M | $10.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$211M | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$297M | $854M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$29M | $1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.8% | +37.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.0% | +12.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.8% | +8.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -76.0% | +11.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -62.7% | -2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.1% | -139.6% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ILLRWTriller Group Inc. | MOMOHello Group Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | — | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | — | $2.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.04x | 7.95x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 1.11x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.73x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 11.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MOMO scores 4/9 vs ILLRW's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ILLRWTriller Group Inc. | MOMOHello Group Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +7.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.3% | +5.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -164.1% | +11.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.0% | +11.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.40x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $180M | $459M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $4.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $182M | $4.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -17.30x | 14.22x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in MOMO five years ago would be worth $5,497 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,747 for ILLRW. Over the past 12 months, MOMO leads with a -8.4% total return vs ILLRW's -46.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MOMO at -3.1% vs ILLRW's -35.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ILLRWTriller Group Inc. | MOMOHello Group Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +72.0% | -4.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -46.4% | -8.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.5% | -9.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.5% | -45.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.5% | -9.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -35.0% | -3.1% |
Risk & Volatility
ILLRW is the less volatile stock with a -0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MOMO's 0.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MOMO currently trades 70.2% from its 52-week high vs ILLRW's 42.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ILLRWTriller Group Inc. | MOMOHello Group Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.72x | 0.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.14 | $9.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.01 | $5.12 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +42.1% | +70.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.7 | 44.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 49K | 769K |
Analyst Outlook
MOMO is the only dividend payer here at 8.64% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ILLRWTriller Group Inc. | MOMOHello Group Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +8.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.83 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | — | +7.9% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Oct 24 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Triller Group Inc. (ILLRW) | 100 | 15.97 | -84.0% |
| Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) | 100 | 97.32 | -2.7% |
Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) returned -45% over 5 years vs Triller Group Inc. (ILLRW)'s -73%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Triller Group Inc. (ILLRW) | $0.00 | $46M | — |
| Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) | $870M | $10.6B | +1114.4% |
Hello Group Inc.'s revenue grew from $870M (2015) to $10.6B (2024) — a 32.0% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Triller Group Inc. (ILLRW) | -20.6% | -6.5% | +68.6% |
| Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) | 10.2% | 9.8% | -3.7% |
Hello Group Inc.'s net margin went from 10% (2015) to 10% (2024).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 7 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) | 2.4 | 1.4 | -41.7% |
Hello Group Inc. has traded in a 1x–3x P/E range over 7 years; current trailing P/E is ~8x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Triller Group Inc. (ILLRW) | 0.05 | -1.56 | -3232.5% |
| Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) | 0.39 | 5.58 | +1330.8% |
Hello Group Inc.'s EPS grew from $0.39 (2015) to $5.58 (2024) — a 34% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Triller Group Inc. generated $-44M FCF in 2023 (+75% vs 2021). Hello Group Inc. generated $1B FCF in 2024 (-7% vs 2021).
ILLRW vs MOMO: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ILLRW or MOMO a better buy right now?
Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) offers the better valuation at 8.0x trailing P/E (1.1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ILLRW or MOMO?
Over the past 5 years, Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) delivered a total return of -45.0%, compared to -72.5% for Triller Group Inc. (ILLRW). A $10,000 investment in MOMO five years ago would be worth approximately $5K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MOMO returned -9.4% versus ILLRW's -72.5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ILLRW or MOMO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Triller Group Inc. (ILLRW) is the lower-risk stock at -0.72β versus Hello Group Inc.'s 0.47β — meaning MOMO is approximately -165% more volatile than ILLRW relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — ILLRW or MOMO?
Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) is the more profitable company, earning 9.8% net margin versus -647.0% for Triller Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 9.8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MOMO leads at 14.5% versus -572.3% for ILLRW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MOMO leads at 39.0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — ILLRW or MOMO?
In this comparison, MOMO (8.6% yield) pays a dividend. ILLRW does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is ILLRW or MOMO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Triller Group Inc. (ILLRW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.72)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ILLRW: -72.5%, MOMO: -9.4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between ILLRW and MOMO?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: ILLRW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MOMO is a small-cap deep-value stock. MOMO pays a dividend while ILLRW does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 5%
- Dividend Yield > 3.4%