Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare inTEST Corporation (INTT) vs FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FORM | 15.2% revenue growth vs INTT's 6.0% |
| Value | INTT | Lower P/E (30.7x vs 55.4x) |
| Quality / Margins | FORM | 6.8% net margin vs INTT's -2.2% |
| Stability / Safety | INTT | Beta 0.77 vs FORM's 2.00 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | FORM | +196.9% vs INTT's +39.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FORM | 4.3% ROA vs INTT's -1.7%, ROIC 6.2% vs 2.9% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Valuation efficiency (growth/$)
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
inTEST Corporation is a technology company that supplies precision test and process solutions for manufacturing and testing across semiconductor, automotive, defense, and life sciences markets. It generates revenue primarily through two segments: Thermal Products (temperature management systems) and Electromechanical Semiconductor Products (test equipment manipulators and docking hardware), with the semiconductor industry being its largest end-market. The company's competitive advantage lies in its specialized engineering expertise for harsh-environment testing applications and its established relationships with major semiconductor manufacturers.
FormFactor is a semiconductor testing equipment company that designs and manufactures probe cards and analytical systems used to test integrated circuits during development and production. It generates revenue primarily from probe cards (~70% of sales) for production testing and systems (~30%) for R&D applications—serving semiconductor manufacturers, foundries, and research institutions. The company's competitive advantage lies in its deep technical expertise in wafer-level testing and strong relationships with leading semiconductor companies that rely on its precision measurement solutions.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
FORM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). INTT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
FORM is the larger business by revenue, generating $785M annually — 6.9x INTT's $114M. FORM is the more profitable business, keeping 6.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INTT's -2.2%. On growth, FORM holds the edge at +13.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | INTTinTEST Corporation | FORMFormFactor, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $114M | $785M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $338,000 | $85M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | $53M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $6M | $12M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.0% | +39.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.3% | +7.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | +6.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +1.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.3% | +13.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.7% | +141.7% |
Valuation Metrics
At 48.5x trailing earnings, INTT trades at a 56% valuation discount to FORM's 111.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FORM offers better value at 9.43x vs INTT's 27.65x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | INTTinTEST Corporation | FORMFormFactor, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $144M | $7.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $150M | $7.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 48.54x | 111.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 30.66x | 55.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 27.65x | 9.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.02x | 76.51x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.10x | 9.99x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.43x | 8.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 57.75x | 96.40x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FORM delivers a 5.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-2 for INTT. FORM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to INTT's 0.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FORM scores 7/9 vs INTT's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | INTTinTEST Corporation | FORMFormFactor, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.4% | +5.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.7% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.9% | +6.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.9% | +6.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.26x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | -$152M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $191M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $26M | $39M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -15.01x | 154.98x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in FORM five years ago would be worth $20,434 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,345 for INTT. Over the past 12 months, FORM leads with a +196.9% total return vs INTT's +39.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FORM at 48.7% vs INTT's -7.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | INTTinTEST Corporation | FORMFormFactor, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +54.5% | +67.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.5% | +196.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.7% | +228.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.4% | +104.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +198.7% | +1201.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.8% | +48.7% |
Risk & Volatility
INTT is the less volatile stock with a 0.77 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FORM's 2.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INTT currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs FORM's 92.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | INTTinTEST Corporation | FORMFormFactor, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.77x | 2.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.83 | $107.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.24 | $22.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.5% | +92.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.7 | 61.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 43K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates INTT as "Buy" and FORM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -22.8% upside for FORM (target: $76) vs -31.3% for INTT (target: $8).
| Metric | INTTinTEST Corporation | FORMFormFactor, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.00 | $76.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | +0.7% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| inTEST Corporation (INTT) | 100 | 192.8 | +92.8% |
| FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) | 100 | 314.66 | +214.7% |
FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) returned +104% over 5 years vs inTEST Corporation (INTT)'s +33%. A $10,000 investment in FORM 5 years ago would be worth $20,434 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| inTEST Corporation (INTT) | $39M | $131M | +236.1% |
| FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) | $282M | $764M | +170.4% |
inTEST Corporation's revenue grew from $39M (2015) to $131M (2024) — a 14.4% CAGR. FormFactor, Inc.'s revenue grew from $282M (2015) to $764M (2024) — a 11.7% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| inTEST Corporation (INTT) | 4.8% | 2.2% | -53.8% |
| FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) | -0.5% | 9.1% | +1790.1% |
inTEST Corporation's net margin went from 5% (2015) to 2% (2024). FormFactor, Inc.'s net margin went from -1% (2015) to 9% (2024).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 8 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| inTEST Corporation (INTT) | 96.1 | 35.8 | -62.7% |
| FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) | 28.5 | 49.4 | +73.3% |
inTEST Corporation has traded in a 13x–96x P/E range over 7 years; current trailing P/E is ~49x. FormFactor, Inc. has traded in a 10x–51x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~111x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| inTEST Corporation (INTT) | 0.18 | 0.24 | +33.3% |
| FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) | -0.03 | 0.89 | +3484.0% |
inTEST Corporation's EPS grew from $0.18 (2015) to $0.24 (2024) — a 3% CAGR. FormFactor, Inc.'s EPS grew from $-0.03 (2015) to $0.89 (2024).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
inTEST Corporation generated $2M FCF in 2024 (-75% vs 2021). FormFactor, Inc. generated $79M FCF in 2024 (+9% vs 2021).
INTT vs FORM: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is INTT or FORM a better buy right now?
inTEST Corporation (INTT) offers the better valuation at 48.5x trailing P/E (30.7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate inTEST Corporation (INTT) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — INTT or FORM?
On trailing P/E, inTEST Corporation (INTT) is the cheapest at 48.5x versus FormFactor, Inc. at 111.1x. On forward P/E, inTEST Corporation is actually cheaper at 30.7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: FormFactor, Inc. wins at 4.70x versus inTEST Corporation's 17.46x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — INTT or FORM?
Over the past 5 years, FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) delivered a total return of +104.3%, compared to +33.4% for inTEST Corporation (INTT). A $10,000 investment in FORM five years ago would be worth approximately $20K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FORM returned +1201% versus INTT's +198.7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — INTT or FORM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), inTEST Corporation (INTT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.77β versus FormFactor, Inc.'s 2.00β — meaning FORM is approximately 160% more volatile than INTT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 26% for inTEST Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — INTT or FORM?
FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) is the more profitable company, earning 9.1% net margin versus 2.2% for inTEST Corporation — meaning it keeps 9.1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FORM leads at 8.5% versus 2.6% for INTT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INTT leads at 42.4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is INTT or FORM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential. By this metric, FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 4.70x versus inTEST Corporation's 17.46x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, inTEST Corporation (INTT) trades at 30.7x forward P/E versus 55.4x for FormFactor, Inc. — 24.7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FORM: -22.8% to $76.29.
07Which pays a better dividend — INTT or FORM?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is INTT or FORM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, inTEST Corporation (INTT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.77), +198.7% 10Y return). FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) carries a higher beta of 2.00 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INTT: +198.7%, FORM: +1201%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between INTT and FORM?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.