Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare iQIYI, Inc. (IQ) vs Cineverse Corp. (CNVS) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CNVS | 59.1% revenue growth vs IQ's -8.3% |
| Value | IQ | Lower P/E (2.5x vs 18.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | IQ | -1.4% net margin vs CNVS's -16.7% |
| Stability / Safety | IQ | Beta 1.31 vs CNVS's 1.49 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | IQ | -16.1% vs CNVS's -18.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | IQ | -0.9% ROA vs CNVS's -13.4%, ROIC 5.8% vs 20.3% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
iQIYI is a leading Chinese online entertainment platform that provides streaming video content including dramas, movies, variety shows, and animations. It generates revenue primarily through membership subscriptions (around 60% of revenue) and online advertising (roughly 25%), with additional income from content distribution and other services. The company's competitive advantage lies in its massive proprietary content library — particularly its popular original productions — and its deep integration within the broader Baidu ecosystem.
Cineverse Corp. is a streaming technology and entertainment company that operates a portfolio of niche streaming channels and provides technology services to other streaming platforms. It generates revenue through a mix of subscription fees from its SVOD channels, advertising on its AVOD and FAST channels, and technology licensing fees to third-party streaming services. The company's competitive advantage lies in its proprietary streaming technology platform and its focus on underserved niche content categories — particularly genre films and enthusiast programming — which creates a defensible position in the fragmented streaming market.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
CNVS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). IQ leads in 2 (Financial Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
IQ is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.1B annually — 489.9x CNVS's $55M. IQ is the more profitable business, keeping -1.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNVS's -16.7%. On growth, IQ holds the edge at -7.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | IQiQIYI, Inc. | CNVSCineverse Corp. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $27.1B | $55M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6.3B | -$2M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$390M | -$9M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $466M | -$13M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.9% | +53.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | -12.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.4% | -16.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | -22.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.8% | -60.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.1% | -113.2% |
Valuation Metrics
At 15.7x trailing earnings, IQ trades at a 16% valuation discount to CNVS's 18.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CNVS's 3.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IQ's 26.1x.
| Metric | IQiQIYI, Inc. | CNVSCineverse Corp. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.4B | $59M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.9B | $45M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.72x | 18.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 2.46x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 26.13x | 3.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.26x | 0.75x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.88x | 1.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.01x | 3.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IQ delivers a -2.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-3 in annual profit, vs $-24 for CNVS. CNVS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQ's 1.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CNVS scores 7/9 vs IQ's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | IQiQIYI, Inc. | CNVSCineverse Corp. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.9% | -24.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.9% | -13.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.8% | +20.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.8% | +22.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.06x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10.7B | -$13M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.5B | $14M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14.2B | $462,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.77x | -4.16x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in CNVS five years ago would be worth $1,075 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $699 for IQ. Over the past 12 months, IQ leads with a -16.1% total return vs CNVS's -18.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CNVS at -29.5% vs IQ's -38.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | IQiQIYI, Inc. | CNVSCineverse Corp. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.8% | +43.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -16.1% | -18.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.0% | -65.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.0% | -89.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.6% | -94.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -38.7% | -29.5% |
Risk & Volatility
IQ is the less volatile stock with a 1.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CNVS's 1.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IQ currently trades 62.3% from its 52-week high vs CNVS's 40.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | IQiQIYI, Inc. | CNVSCineverse Corp. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.31x | 1.49x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.84 | $7.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.50 | $1.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +62.3% | +40.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.5 | 66.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7.9M | 238K |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | IQiQIYI, Inc. | CNVSCineverse Corp. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.10 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Feb 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| iQIYI, Inc. (IQ) | 100 | 8.2 | -91.8% |
| Cineverse Corp. (CNVS) | 100 | 20 | -80.0% |
Cineverse Corp. (CNVS) returned -89% over 5 years vs iQIYI, Inc. (IQ)'s -93%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| iQIYI, Inc. (IQ) | $11.2B | $29.2B | +160.1% |
| Cineverse Corp. (CNVS) | $104M | $78M | -25.1% |
Cineverse Corp.'s revenue grew from $104M (2016) to $78M (2025) — a -3.2% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| iQIYI, Inc. (IQ) | -27.4% | 2.6% | +109.6% |
| Cineverse Corp. (CNVS) | -40.0% | 4.6% | +111.5% |
Cineverse Corp.'s net margin went from -40% (2016) to 5% (2025).
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| iQIYI, Inc. (IQ) | -11.45 | 0.77 | +106.7% |
| Cineverse Corp. (CNVS) | -130.2 | 0.16 | +100.1% |
Cineverse Corp.'s EPS grew from $-130.20 (2016) to $0.16 (2025).
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
iQIYI, Inc. generated $2B FCF in 2024 (+130% vs 2021). Cineverse Corp. generated $16M FCF in 2025 (+172% vs 2021).
IQ vs CNVS: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IQ or CNVS a better buy right now?
iQIYI, Inc. (IQ) offers the better valuation at 15.7x trailing P/E (2.5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate iQIYI, Inc. (IQ) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IQ or CNVS?
On trailing P/E, iQIYI, Inc. (IQ) is the cheapest at 15.7x versus Cineverse Corp. at 18.8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IQ or CNVS?
Over the past 5 years, Cineverse Corp. (CNVS) delivered a total return of -89.3%, compared to -93.0% for iQIYI, Inc. (IQ). A $10,000 investment in CNVS five years ago would be worth approximately $1K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IQ returned -88.6% versus CNVS's -94.2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IQ or CNVS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), iQIYI, Inc. (IQ) is the lower-risk stock at 1.31β versus Cineverse Corp.'s 1.49β — meaning CNVS is approximately 14% more volatile than IQ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cineverse Corp. (CNVS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 106% for iQIYI, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — IQ or CNVS?
Cineverse Corp. (CNVS) is the more profitable company, earning 4.6% net margin versus 2.6% for iQIYI, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4.6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CNVS leads at 10.1% versus 6.2% for IQ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CNVS leads at 50.4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — IQ or CNVS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is IQ or CNVS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, iQIYI, Inc. (IQ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IQ: -88.6%, CNVS: -94.2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between IQ and CNVS?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: IQ is a small-cap deep-value stock; CNVS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.