Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. (KOF) vs Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MNST | 10.7% revenue growth vs KOF's 4.3% |
| Value | KOF | Lower P/E (0.9x vs 37.5x), PEG 0.05 vs 4.69 |
| Quality / Margins | MNST | 23.0% net margin vs KOF's 8.1% |
| Stability / Safety | KOF | Beta 0.29 vs MNST's 0.30 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | MNST | +56.1% vs KOF's +28.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MNST | 19.1% ROA vs KOF's 7.6%, ROIC 33.1% vs 15.9% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Valuation efficiency (growth/$)
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Coca-Cola FEMSA is the world's largest Coca-Cola franchise bottler, producing and distributing Coca-Cola trademark beverages across Latin America. It generates revenue primarily from beverage sales—sparkling drinks, waters, juices, and other non-alcoholic beverages—with additional income from distributing Heineken beer in Brazil. Its key advantage is exclusive territorial rights to produce and sell Coca-Cola products in its operating regions, backed by the world's most valuable beverage brand.
Monster Beverage is a leading energy drink company that develops, markets, and sells a wide range of energy beverages globally. It generates revenue primarily through its Monster Energy Drinks segment — which accounts for the vast majority of sales — along with its Strategic Brands portfolio and other beverage offerings. The company's moat lies in its powerful Monster Energy brand, extensive distribution network, and strong relationships with bottlers and retailers that create significant barriers to entry.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
MNST leads in 2 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). KOF leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
KOF is the larger business by revenue, generating $292.7B annually — 35.3x MNST's $8.3B. MNST is the more profitable business, keeping 23.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KOF's 8.1%. On growth, MNST holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | KOFCoca-Cola FEMSA, … | MNSTMonster Beverage … |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $292.7B | $8.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $48.4B | $2.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $23.9B | $1.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $6.1B | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.6% | +55.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | +29.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.1% | +23.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.4% | +17.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.9% | +64.3% |
Valuation Metrics
At 16.9x trailing earnings, KOF trades at a 62% valuation discount to MNST's 44.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), KOF offers better value at 0.92x vs MNST's 5.49x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | KOFCoca-Cola FEMSA, … | MNSTMonster Beverage … |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $23.4B | $83.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $26.5B | $81.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.87x | 43.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.87x | 37.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.92x | 5.49x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.22x | 33.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.38x | 10.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.61x | 10.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MNST delivers a 23.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $15 for KOF. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MNST scores 5/9 vs KOF's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | KOFCoca-Cola FEMSA, … | MNSTMonster Beverage … |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.5% | +23.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.6% | +19.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.9% | +33.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.6% | +31.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.54x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $54.6B | -$2.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $28.1B | $2.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $82.7B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.61x | 299.84x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in KOF five years ago would be worth $29,202 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,484 for MNST. Over the past 12 months, MNST leads with a +56.1% total return vs KOF's +28.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KOF at 19.0% vs MNST's 18.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | KOFCoca-Cola FEMSA, … | MNSTMonster Beverage … |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.2% | +12.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +28.8% | +56.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +68.4% | +67.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +192.0% | +94.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.7% | +307.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.0% | +18.8% |
Risk & Volatility
KOF is the less volatile stock with a 0.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNST's 0.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | KOFCoca-Cola FEMSA, … | MNSTMonster Beverage … |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.29x | 0.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $116.36 | $87.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $80.22 | $53.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.5% | +97.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.3 | 72.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 156K | 4.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates KOF as "Buy" and MNST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -0.1% upside for KOF (target: $111) vs -1.6% for MNST (target: $84).
| Metric | KOFCoca-Cola FEMSA, … | MNSTMonster Beverage … |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $111.00 | $83.92 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.… (KOF) | 100 | 186.59 | +86.6% |
| Monster Beverage Co… (MNST) | 100 | 250.46 | +150.5% |
Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.… (KOF) returned +192% over 5 years vs Monster Beverage Co… (MNST)'s +95%. A $10,000 investment in KOF 5 years ago would be worth $29,202 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.… (KOF) | $177.7B | $291.7B | +64.2% |
| Monster Beverage Co… (MNST) | $3.0B | $8.3B | +172.0% |
Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V.'s revenue grew from $177.7B (2016) to $291.7B (2025) — a 5.7% CAGR. Monster Beverage Corporation's revenue grew from $3.0B (2016) to $8.3B (2025) — a 11.8% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.… (KOF) | 5.7% | 8.2% | +44.2% |
| Monster Beverage Co… (MNST) | 23.4% | 23.0% | -1.7% |
Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V.'s net margin went from 6% (2016) to 8% (2025). Monster Beverage Corporation's net margin went from 23% (2016) to 23% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.… (KOF) | 0.9 | 0.8 | -11.1% |
| Monster Beverage Co… (MNST) | 44.6 | 39.5 | -11.4% |
Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. has traded in a 1x–1x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~17x. Monster Beverage Corporation has traded in a 28x–45x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~44x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.… (KOF) | 48.5 | 113.5 | +134.0% |
| Monster Beverage Co… (MNST) | 0.6 | 1.94 | +223.3% |
Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V.'s EPS grew from $48.50 (2016) to $113.50 (2025) — a 10% CAGR. Monster Beverage Corporation's EPS grew from $0.60 (2016) to $1.94 (2025) — a 14% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. generated $0M FCF in 2025 (-100% vs 2021). Monster Beverage Corporation generated $0M FCF in 2025 (-100% vs 2021).
KOF vs MNST: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KOF or MNST a better buy right now?
Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. (KOF) offers the better valuation at 16.9x trailing P/E (0.9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. (KOF) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KOF or MNST?
On trailing P/E, Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. (KOF) is the cheapest at 16.9x versus Monster Beverage Corporation at 44.0x. On forward P/E, Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. is actually cheaper at 0.9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. wins at 0.05x versus Monster Beverage Corporation's 4.69x — a PEG below 1.0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KOF or MNST?
Over the past 5 years, Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. (KOF) delivered a total return of +192.0%, compared to +94.8% for Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). A $10,000 investment in KOF five years ago would be worth approximately $29K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MNST returned +307.7% versus KOF's +84.7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KOF or MNST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. (KOF) is the lower-risk stock at 0.29β versus Monster Beverage Corporation's 0.30β — meaning MNST is approximately 5% more volatile than KOF relative to the S&P 500.
05Which has better profit margins — KOF or MNST?
Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) is the more profitable company, earning 23.0% net margin versus 8.2% for Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. — meaning it keeps 23.0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MNST leads at 29.2% versus 14.7% for KOF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNST leads at 55.8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is KOF or MNST more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential. By this metric, Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. (KOF) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0.05x versus Monster Beverage Corporation's 4.69x. A PEG below 1.0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. (KOF) trades at 0.9x forward P/E versus 37.5x for Monster Beverage Corporation — 36.6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KOF: -0.1% to $111.00.
07Which pays a better dividend — KOF or MNST?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is KOF or MNST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.30), +307.7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MNST: +307.7%, KOF: +84.7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between KOF and MNST?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: KOF is a mid-cap deep-value stock; MNST is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.