Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) vs Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FND | 5.1% revenue growth vs LIVE's -5.9% |
| Value | LIVE | Lower P/E (2.8x vs 33.3x), PEG 0.29 vs 38.90 |
| Quality / Margins | LIVE | 5.0% net margin vs FND's 4.7% |
| Stability / Safety | LIVE | Beta 0.48 vs FND's 1.30 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | LIVE | +73.6% vs FND's -28.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | LIVE | 5.7% ROA vs FND's 3.9%, ROIC 3.5% vs 5.3% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Valuation efficiency (growth/$)
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Live Ventures is a diversified holding company operating in flooring manufacturing, steel production, and specialty retail. It generates revenue through three main segments: flooring manufacturing (~40% of sales), steel manufacturing (~35%), and retail operations (~25%) selling entertainment products through its Vintage Stock stores. The company's competitive advantage lies in its operational diversification across recession-resistant industries and its vertically integrated flooring business that controls manufacturing from yarn to finished products.
Floor & Decor is a specialty retailer operating warehouse-format stores that sell hard surface flooring — tile, wood, laminate, vinyl, and natural stone — along with installation accessories to both professional contractors and do-it-yourself homeowners. It generates revenue primarily through in-store sales (roughly 90% of total) with the remainder from e-commerce, serving a mix of professional installers, commercial businesses, and retail customers. The company's competitive advantage lies in its large-format, low-cost warehouse model that offers extensive in-stock selection at value prices — a difficult-to-replicate physical footprint and supply chain.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
FND leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Total Returns). LIVE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
FND is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 10.5x LIVE's $442M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.0% (LIVE) to 4.7% (FND). On growth, FND holds the edge at +5.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | LIVELive Ventures Inc… | FNDFloor & Decor Hol… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $442M | $4.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $29M | $524M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $22M | $217M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $22M | $23M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.0% | +42.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +6.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +4.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +0.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.7% | +5.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -112.5% | +10.4% |
Valuation Metrics
At 2.8x trailing earnings, LIVE trades at a 92% valuation discount to FND's 36.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LIVE offers better value at 0.29x vs FND's 38.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | LIVELive Ventures Inc… | FNDFloor & Decor Hol… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $43M | $7.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $251M | $9.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2.83x | 35.98x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 33.25x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.29x | 38.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.85x | 33.30x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.10x | 1.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.64x | 3.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.04x | 116.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LIVE delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $9 for FND. FND carries lower financial leverage with a 0.75x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LIVE's 2.27x.
| Metric | LIVELive Ventures Inc… | FNDFloor & Decor Hol… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +23.3% | +9.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.7% | +3.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.5% | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.27x | 0.75x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $208M | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $249M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $216M | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.01x | 39.46x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in FND five years ago would be worth $7,221 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,740 for LIVE. Over the past 12 months, LIVE leads with a +73.6% total return vs FND's -28.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FND at -9.0% vs LIVE's -24.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | LIVELive Ventures Inc… | FNDFloor & Decor Hol… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.1% | +9.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +73.6% | -28.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.0% | -24.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.6% | -27.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.1% | +115.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -24.5% | -9.0% |
Risk & Volatility
LIVE is the less volatile stock with a 0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FND's 1.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FND currently trades 70.3% from its 52-week high vs LIVE's 53.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | LIVELive Ventures Inc… | FNDFloor & Decor Hol… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.48x | 1.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.88 | $98.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.25 | $55.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.9% | +70.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 30.6 | 52.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7K | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | LIVELive Ventures Inc… | FNDFloor & Decor Hol… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $76.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live Ventures Incor… (LIVE) | 100 | 368.52 | +268.5% |
| Floor & Decor Holdi… (FND) | 100 | 124.32 | +24.3% |
Floor & Decor Holdi… (FND) returned -28% over 5 years vs Live Ventures Incor… (LIVE)'s -43%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live Ventures Incor… (LIVE) | $79M | $445M | +463.5% |
| Floor & Decor Holdi… (FND) | $1.1B | $4.7B | +345.8% |
Live Ventures Incorporated's revenue grew from $79M (2016) to $445M (2025) — a 21.2% CAGR. Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.'s revenue grew from $1.1B (2016) to $4.7B (2025) — a 18.1% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live Ventures Incor… (LIVE) | 22.6% | 5.1% | -77.4% |
| Floor & Decor Holdi… (FND) | 4.1% | 4.5% | +8.7% |
Live Ventures Incorporated's net margin went from 23% (2016) to 5% (2025). Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.'s net margin went from 4% (2016) to 4% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live Ventures Incor… (LIVE) | 9.9 | 3 | -69.7% |
| Floor & Decor Holdi… (FND) | 47.3 | 31.7 | -33.0% |
Live Ventures Incorporated has traded in a 3x–10x P/E range over 6 years; current trailing P/E is ~3x. Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. has traded in a 23x–53x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~36x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live Ventures Incor… (LIVE) | 5.4 | 4.93 | -8.7% |
| Floor & Decor Holdi… (FND) | 0.44 | 1.92 | +336.4% |
Live Ventures Incorporated's EPS grew from $5.40 (2016) to $4.93 (2025) — a -1% CAGR. Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.'s EPS grew from $0.44 (2016) to $1.92 (2025) — a 18% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Live Ventures Incorporated generated $21M FCF in 2025 (+18% vs 2021). Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. generated $64M FCF in 2025 (+160% vs 2021).
LIVE vs FND: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LIVE or FND a better buy right now?
Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) offers the better valuation at 2.8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND) a "Hold" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LIVE or FND?
On trailing P/E, Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) is the cheapest at 2.8x versus Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. at 36.0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LIVE or FND?
Over the past 5 years, Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND) delivered a total return of -27.8%, compared to -42.6% for Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE). A $10,000 investment in FND five years ago would be worth approximately $7K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FND returned +115.6% versus LIVE's +50.1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LIVE or FND?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.48β versus Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.'s 1.30β — meaning FND is approximately 171% more volatile than LIVE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 75% versus 2% for Live Ventures Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — LIVE or FND?
Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) is the more profitable company, earning 5.1% net margin versus 4.5% for Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5.1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FND leads at 5.8% versus 3.3% for LIVE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FND leads at 43.6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LIVE or FND?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is LIVE or FND better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.48)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIVE: +50.1%, FND: +115.6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LIVE and FND?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: LIVE is a small-cap deep-value stock; FND is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.