Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) vs Pinnacle Food Group Limited Class A Common Shares (PFAI) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | PFAI | 56.6% revenue growth vs LIVE's -5.9% |
| Value | LIVE | Lower P/E (2.8x vs 106.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | PFAI | 8.7% net margin vs LIVE's 5.0% |
| Stability / Safety | PFAI | Lower D/E ratio (34.9% vs 227.1%) |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | LIVE | +73.6% vs PFAI's -43.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | PFAI | 6.1% ROA vs LIVE's 5.7% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Live Ventures is a diversified holding company operating in flooring manufacturing, steel production, and specialty retail. It generates revenue through three main segments: flooring manufacturing (~40% of sales), steel manufacturing (~35%), and retail operations (~25%) selling entertainment products through its Vintage Stock stores. The company's competitive advantage lies in its operational diversification across recession-resistant industries and its vertically integrated flooring business that controls manufacturing from yarn to finished products.
Pinnacle Food Group is a Canadian company that designs and sells smart hydroponic growing systems for households, community groups, and urban farms. It generates revenue primarily from hardware sales of its tailored hydroponic systems — supplemented by technical support services and data-driven optimization tools. The company's competitive advantage lies in its integrated hardware-software ecosystem that enables users to optimize farming productivity through data analytics and tailored support.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
PFAI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). LIVE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
LIVE is the larger business by revenue, generating $442M annually — 134.3x PFAI's $3M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 8.7% (PFAI) to 5.0% (LIVE).
| Metric | LIVELive Ventures Inc… | PFAIPinnacle Food Gro… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $442M | $3M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $29M | — |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $22M | — |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $22M | — |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.0% | +47.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +18.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +8.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | -27.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.7% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -112.5% | — |
Valuation Metrics
At 2.8x trailing earnings, LIVE trades at a 97% valuation discount to PFAI's 106.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LIVE's 7.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PFAI's 17.5x.
| Metric | LIVELive Ventures Inc… | PFAIPinnacle Food Gro… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $43M | $17M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $251M | $17M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2.83x | 106.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.29x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.85x | 17.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.10x | 5.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.64x | 47.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.04x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PFAI delivers a 61.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $61 in annual profit, vs $23 for LIVE. PFAI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LIVE's 2.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LIVE scores 7/9 vs PFAI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | LIVELive Ventures Inc… | PFAIPinnacle Food Gro… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +23.3% | +61.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.7% | +6.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.5% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | +34.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.27x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $208M | -$523,124 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $685,796 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $216M | $162,672 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.01x | — |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in LIVE five years ago would be worth $5,740 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,625 for PFAI. Over the past 12 months, LIVE leads with a +73.6% total return vs PFAI's -43.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PFAI at -17.5% vs LIVE's -24.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | LIVELive Ventures Inc… | PFAIPinnacle Food Gro… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.1% | +3.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +73.6% | -43.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.0% | -43.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.6% | -43.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.1% | -43.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -24.5% | -17.5% |
Risk & Volatility
PFAI is the less volatile stock with a -0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LIVE's 0.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LIVE currently trades 53.9% from its 52-week high vs PFAI's 45.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | LIVELive Ventures Inc… | PFAIPinnacle Food Gro… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.48x | -0.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.88 | $4.93 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.25 | $1.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.9% | +45.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 30.6 | 49.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7K | 17K |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | LIVELive Ventures Inc… | PFAIPinnacle Food Gro… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live Ventures Incor… (LIVE) | $79M | $445M | +463.5% |
| Pinnacle Food Group… (PFAI) | $177326.00 | $3M | +1755.3% |
Live Ventures Incorporated's revenue grew from $79M (2016) to $445M (2025) — a 21.2% CAGR.
Chart 2Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live Ventures Incor… (LIVE) | 22.6% | 5.1% | -77.4% |
| Pinnacle Food Group… (PFAI) | -115.7% | 8.7% | +107.5% |
Live Ventures Incorporated's net margin went from 23% (2016) to 5% (2025).
Chart 3P/E Ratio History — 6 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live Ventures Incor… (LIVE) | 9.9 | 3 | -69.7% |
Live Ventures Incorporated has traded in a 3x–10x P/E range over 6 years; current trailing P/E is ~3x.
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live Ventures Incor… (LIVE) | 5.4 | 4.93 | -8.7% |
| Pinnacle Food Group… (PFAI) | -0.01 | 0.02 | +256.3% |
Live Ventures Incorporated's EPS grew from $5.40 (2016) to $4.93 (2025) — a -1% CAGR.
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Live Ventures Incorporated generated $21M FCF in 2025 (+18% vs 2021). Pinnacle Food Group Limited Class A Common Shares generated $-1M FCF in 2024 (-729% vs 2022).
LIVE vs PFAI: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LIVE or PFAI a better buy right now?
Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) offers the better valuation at 2.8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LIVE or PFAI?
On trailing P/E, Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) is the cheapest at 2.8x versus Pinnacle Food Group Limited Class A Common Shares at 106.6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LIVE or PFAI?
Over the past 5 years, Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) delivered a total return of -42.6%, compared to -43.8% for Pinnacle Food Group Limited Class A Common Shares (PFAI). A $10,000 investment in LIVE five years ago would be worth approximately $6K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LIVE returned +50.1% versus PFAI's -43.7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LIVE or PFAI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pinnacle Food Group Limited Class A Common Shares (PFAI) is the lower-risk stock at -0.01β versus Live Ventures Incorporated's 0.48β — meaning LIVE is approximately -3917% more volatile than PFAI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pinnacle Food Group Limited Class A Common Shares (PFAI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 2% for Live Ventures Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — LIVE or PFAI?
Pinnacle Food Group Limited Class A Common Shares (PFAI) is the more profitable company, earning 8.7% net margin versus 5.1% for Live Ventures Incorporated — meaning it keeps 8.7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PFAI leads at 18.7% versus 3.3% for LIVE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PFAI leads at 47.3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LIVE or PFAI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is LIVE or PFAI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pinnacle Food Group Limited Class A Common Shares (PFAI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.01)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PFAI: -43.7%, LIVE: +50.1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LIVE and PFAI?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: LIVE is a small-cap deep-value stock; PFAI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.