Financial - Capital Markets
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MKTX vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Diversified
MKTX vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Capital Markets | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $5.62B | $834.20B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $817M | $270.79B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $220M | $58.03B |
| Gross Margin | 68.9% | 58.6% |
| Operating Margin | 41.7% | 27.7% |
| Forward P/E | 18.5x | 13.9x |
| Total Debt | $73M | $751.15B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $544M | $469.32B |
MKTX vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MarketAxess Holding… (MKTX) | 100 | 29.7 | -70.3% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 318.0 | +218.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MKTX vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MKTX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta -0.28, yield 2.0%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.28, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 4.41x
- Beta -0.28, yield 2.0%, current ratio 4.41x
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.6%, EPS growth 21.7%
- 466.1% 10Y total return vs MKTX's 40.4%
- PEG 1.07 vs MKTX's 3.00
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.6% NII/revenue growth vs MKTX's 8.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.9x vs 18.5x), PEG 1.07 vs 3.00 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs JPM's 0.3% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (5.2% vs 217.9%) | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +24.8% vs MKTX's -31.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs JPM's 0.3% |
MKTX vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MKTX vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MKTX leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $270.8B annually — 331.4x MKTX's $817M. MKTX is the more profitable business, keeping 33.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JPM's 21.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $817M | $270.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $429M | $81.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $220M | $58.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $346M | -$119.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.9% | +58.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +41.7% | +27.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +33.6% | +21.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +45.9% | -15.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.2% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.7x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 25% valuation discount to MKTX's 20.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 1.21x vs MKTX's 3.38x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.6B | $834.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.1B | $1.12T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.78x | 15.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.46x | 13.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.38x | 1.21x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.22x | 13.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.88x | 3.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.10x | 2.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.98x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MKTX leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 16.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $16 for MKTX. MKTX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MKTX scores 6/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.8% | +16.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.9% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.0% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +23.0% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 2.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$472M | $281.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $544M | $469.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $73M | $751.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 443.10x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,108 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,629 for MKTX. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +24.8% total return vs MKTX's -31.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.4% vs MKTX's -18.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.8% | -4.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -31.9% | +24.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.6% | +137.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.7% | +111.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.4% | +466.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -18.9% | +33.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MKTX and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MKTX is the less volatile stock with a -0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 1.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 91.7% from its 52-week high vs MKTX's 65.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.28x | 1.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $232.84 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $148.53 | $248.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.0% | +91.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 32.3 | 51.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 440K | 8.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MKTX and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MKTX as "Hold" and JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 29.3% upside for MKTX (target: $196) vs 9.5% for JPM (target: $339). For income investors, MKTX offers the higher dividend yield at 1.98% vs JPM's 1.66%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $195.60 | $338.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.99 | $5.13 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.3% | +3.4% |
MKTX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
MKTX vs JPM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MKTX or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger pick with 14. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 6% for MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (MKTX). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 15. 7x trailing P/E (13. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MKTX or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 15. 7x versus MarketAxess Holdings Inc. at 20. 8x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 13. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 1. 07x versus MarketAxess Holdings Inc. 's 3. 00x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MKTX or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +111. 1%, compared to -63. 7% for MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (MKTX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +466. 1% versus MKTX's +40. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MKTX or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MarketAxess Holdings Inc.
(MKTX) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 28β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 1. 00β — meaning JPM is approximately -457% more volatile than MKTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (MKTX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 2% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MKTX or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is pulling ahead at 14. 6% versus 8. 6% for MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (MKTX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: JPMorgan Chase & Co. grew EPS 21. 7% year-over-year, compared to 6. 3% for MarketAxess Holdings Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MKTX or JPM?
MarketAxess Holdings Inc.
(MKTX) is the more profitable company, earning 33. 6% net margin versus 21. 6% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — meaning it keeps 33. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MKTX leads at 41. 7% versus 27. 7% for JPM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MKTX leads at 68. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MKTX or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 07x versus MarketAxess Holdings Inc. 's 3. 00x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 13. 9x forward P/E versus 18. 5x for MarketAxess Holdings Inc. — 4. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MKTX: 29. 3% to $195. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — MKTX or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (MKTX) offers the highest yield at 2. 0%, versus 1. 7% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).
09Is MKTX or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MarketAxess Holdings Inc.
(MKTX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 28), 2. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MKTX: +40. 4%, JPM: +466. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MKTX and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MKTX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.