Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Matador Resources Company (MTDR) vs Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FANG | 36.3% revenue growth vs MTDR's 6.2% |
| Value | MTDR | Lower P/E (11.6x vs 17.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | MTDR | 20.5% net margin vs FANG's 11.1% |
| Stability / Safety | FANG | Beta 1.14 vs MTDR's 1.40, lower leverage |
| Dividends | MTDR | 2.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs FANG's 2.3% |
| Momentum (1Y) | FANG | +12.0% vs MTDR's +1.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MTDR | 7.3% ROA vs FANG's 2.3%, ROIC 11.8% vs 6.7% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Matador Resources is an independent oil and gas exploration and production company focused on shale plays in the Delaware Basin and other U.S. regions. It generates revenue primarily from oil sales (~60% of total revenue) and natural gas sales (~40%), supplemented by midstream services for third parties. The company's competitive advantage lies in its concentrated, high-quality acreage position in the prolific Delaware Basin — particularly in the Wolfcamp and Bone Spring formations — which provides low-cost, high-return drilling opportunities.
Diamondback Energy is an independent oil and natural gas company focused on unconventional resource development in the Permian Basin. It generates revenue primarily from crude oil production — roughly 70% of total revenue — with natural gas and natural gas liquids making up the remainder. The company's competitive advantage lies in its large, contiguous acreage position in the Permian's most productive formations, which enables efficient, low-cost development through scale and operational expertise.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
MTDR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Valuation Metrics). FANG leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
FANG is the larger business by revenue, generating $15.0B annually — 4.1x MTDR's $3.7B. MTDR is the more profitable business, keeping 20.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FANG's 11.1%. On growth, FANG holds the edge at -8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | MTDRMatador Resources… | FANGDiamondback Energ… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.7B | $15.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.4B | $10.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $759M | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $830M | $1.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +88.8% | +35.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +33.2% | +32.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.5% | +11.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.5% | +9.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.3% | -8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.4% | -2.4% |
Valuation Metrics
At 8.4x trailing earnings, MTDR trades at a 72% valuation discount to FANG's 30.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MTDR's 3.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FANG's 6.4x.
| Metric | MTDRMatador Resources… | FANGDiamondback Energ… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.5B | $49.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.6B | $63.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.44x | 30.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.65x | 17.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.54x | 6.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.75x | 3.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.07x | 1.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.67x | 9.46x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MTDR delivers a 12.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $4 for FANG. FANG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MTDR's 0.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MTDR scores 5/9 vs FANG's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | MTDRMatador Resources… | FANGDiamondback Energ… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.7% | +3.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.3% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.8% | +6.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.8% | +7.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.35x | 0.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.1B | $14.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $106M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.1B | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.96x | 8.68x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in FANG five years ago would be worth $27,840 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $24,960 for MTDR. Over the past 12 months, FANG leads with a +12.0% total return vs MTDR's +1.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FANG at 11.4% vs MTDR's 0.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | MTDRMatador Resources… | FANGDiamondback Energ… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.4% | +14.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.4% | +12.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.2% | +38.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +149.6% | +178.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +240.8% | +191.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.4% | +11.4% |
Risk & Volatility
FANG is the less volatile stock with a 1.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MTDR's 1.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | MTDRMatador Resources… | FANGDiamondback Energ… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.40x | 1.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $53.84 | $177.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.19 | $114.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.5% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.6 | 52.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MTDR as "Buy" and FANG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.3% upside for MTDR (target: $57) vs 5.7% for FANG (target: $184). For income investors, MTDR offers the higher dividend yield at 2.55% vs FANG's 2.30%.
| Metric | MTDRMatador Resources… | FANGDiamondback Energ… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $56.67 | $184.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 41 | 51 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.5% | +2.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.31 | $4.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | +4.1% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matador Resources C… (MTDR) | 100 | 433.66 | +333.7% |
| Diamondback Energy,… (FANG) | 100 | 255.29 | +155.3% |
Diamondback Energy,… (FANG) returned +178% over 5 years vs Matador Resources C… (MTDR)'s +150%. A $10,000 investment in FANG 5 years ago would be worth $27,840 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matador Resources C… (MTDR) | $264M | $3.7B | +1297.9% |
| Diamondback Energy,… (FANG) | $527M | $15.0B | +2750.7% |
Matador Resources Company's revenue grew from $264M (2016) to $3.7B (2025) — a 34.1% CAGR. Diamondback Energy, Inc.'s revenue grew from $527M (2016) to $15.0B (2025) — a 45.1% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matador Resources C… (MTDR) | -36.8% | 20.5% | +155.8% |
| Diamondback Energy,… (FANG) | -31.3% | 11.1% | +135.4% |
Matador Resources Company's net margin went from -37% (2016) to 21% (2025). Diamondback Energy, Inc.'s net margin went from -31% (2016) to 11% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 8 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matador Resources C… (MTDR) | 25.3 | 7 | -72.3% |
| Diamondback Energy,… (FANG) | 25.6 | 26.2 | +2.3% |
Matador Resources Company has traded in a 6x–25x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~8x. Diamondback Energy, Inc. has traded in a 6x–64x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~30x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matador Resources C… (MTDR) | -1.07 | 6.09 | +669.2% |
| Diamondback Energy,… (FANG) | -2.2 | 5.73 | +360.5% |
Matador Resources Company's EPS grew from $-1.07 (2016) to $6.09 (2025). Diamondback Energy, Inc.'s EPS grew from $-2.20 (2016) to $5.73 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Matador Resources Company generated $2B FCF in 2025 (+658% vs 2021). Diamondback Energy, Inc. generated $5B FCF in 2025 (+213% vs 2021).
MTDR vs FANG: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MTDR or FANG a better buy right now?
Matador Resources Company (MTDR) offers the better valuation at 8.4x trailing P/E (11.6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Matador Resources Company (MTDR) a "Buy" — based on 41 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MTDR or FANG?
On trailing P/E, Matador Resources Company (MTDR) is the cheapest at 8.4x versus Diamondback Energy, Inc. at 30.4x. On forward P/E, Matador Resources Company is actually cheaper at 11.6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MTDR or FANG?
Over the past 5 years, Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) delivered a total return of +178.4%, compared to +149.6% for Matador Resources Company (MTDR). A $10,000 investment in FANG five years ago would be worth approximately $28K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MTDR returned +240.8% versus FANG's +191.4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MTDR or FANG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) is the lower-risk stock at 1.14β versus Matador Resources Company's 1.40β — meaning MTDR is approximately 23% more volatile than FANG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 35% for Matador Resources Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — MTDR or FANG?
Matador Resources Company (MTDR) is the more profitable company, earning 20.5% net margin versus 11.1% for Diamondback Energy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20.5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MTDR leads at 33.2% versus 32.7% for FANG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MTDR leads at 88.8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is MTDR or FANG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Matador Resources Company (MTDR) trades at 11.6x forward P/E versus 17.6x for Diamondback Energy, Inc. — 6.0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MTDR: 10.3% to $56.67.
07Which pays a better dividend — MTDR or FANG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. Matador Resources Company (MTDR) offers the highest yield at 2.5%, versus 2.3% for Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG).
08Is MTDR or FANG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.14), 2.3% yield, +191.4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FANG: +191.4%, MTDR: +240.8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between MTDR and FANG?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: MTDR is a small-cap deep-value stock; FANG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.