Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Oblong, Inc. (OBLG) vs Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TEAM | 19.7% revenue growth vs OBLG's -37.6% |
| Quality / Margins | TEAM | -3.3% net margin vs OBLG's -187.2% |
| Stability / Safety | TEAM | Beta 1.43 vs OBLG's 2.12 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | OBLG | -69.8% vs TEAM's -73.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TEAM | -3.1% ROA vs OBLG's -40.9% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Oblong provides multi-stream visual collaboration technologies and managed services for video conferencing and network applications. It generates revenue from collaboration products like its Mezzanine platform and managed services for video environments — including network connectivity and support services. The company's competitive advantage lies in its proprietary multi-screen, multi-device collaboration technology that enables seamless visual communication across distributed teams.
Atlassian is a software company that provides collaboration and productivity tools for software development and project management teams. It generates revenue primarily through subscription fees for its cloud-based products — Jira, Confluence, Trello, and Bitbucket — with cloud subscriptions now representing over 90% of total revenue. The company's moat lies in its deeply embedded ecosystem within development workflows, creating high switching costs as teams coordinate work across its interconnected tools.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
TEAM leads in 5 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). OBLG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
TEAM is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.8B annually — 2422.2x OBLG's $2M. TEAM is the more profitable business, keeping -3.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OBLG's -187.2%. On growth, TEAM holds the edge at +23.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | OBLGOblong, Inc. | TEAMAtlassian Corpora… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $5.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | -$79M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | -$189M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $1.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.0% | +83.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -130.5% | -3.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -187.2% | -3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -129.4% | +22.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.0% | +23.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +93.4% | -6.7% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | OBLGOblong, Inc. | TEAMAtlassian Corpora… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $7.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$4M | $5.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.07x | -76.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.53x | 1.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.23x | 14.62x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 5.05x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TEAM delivers a -11.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-12 in annual profit, vs $-45 for OBLG. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TEAM scores 7/9 vs OBLG's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | OBLGOblong, Inc. | TEAMAtlassian Corpora… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -45.3% | -11.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -40.9% | -3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -110.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -88.2% | -4.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.92x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | -$1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $2.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -2.72x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in TEAM five years ago would be worth $2,987 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4 for OBLG. Over the past 12 months, OBLG leads with a -69.8% total return vs TEAM's -73.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TEAM at -23.0% vs OBLG's -76.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | OBLGOblong, Inc. | TEAMAtlassian Corpora… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -44.2% | -51.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -69.8% | -73.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | -54.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -70.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +216.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -76.6% | -23.0% |
Risk & Volatility
TEAM is the less volatile stock with a 1.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OBLG's 2.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TEAM currently trades 26.2% from its 52-week high vs OBLG's 20.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | OBLGOblong, Inc. | TEAMAtlassian Corpora… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.12x | 1.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.50 | $287.26 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.96 | $67.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +20.0% | +26.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 26.1 | 31.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 36K | 4.4M |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | OBLGOblong, Inc. | TEAMAtlassian Corpora… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $187.35 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +10.9% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oblong, Inc. (OBLG) | 100 | 0.18 | -99.8% |
| Atlassian Corporati… (TEAM) | 100 | 77.44 | -22.6% |
Atlassian Corporati… (TEAM) returned -70% over 5 years vs Oblong, Inc. (OBLG)'s -100%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oblong, Inc. (OBLG) | $19M | $2M | -87.6% |
| Atlassian Corporati… (TEAM) | $457M | $5.2B | +1041.1% |
Atlassian Corporation's revenue grew from $457M (2016) to $5.2B (2025) — a 31.1% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oblong, Inc. (OBLG) | -18.4% | -170.0% | -824.8% |
| Atlassian Corporati… (TEAM) | 1.0% | -4.9% | -614.4% |
Atlassian Corporation's net margin went from 1% (2016) to -5% (2025).
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oblong, Inc. (OBLG) | -595.27 | -15.71 | +97.4% |
| Atlassian Corporati… (TEAM) | 0.02 | -0.98 | -5000.0% |
Atlassian Corporation's EPS grew from $0.02 (2016) to $-0.98 (2025) — a NaN% CAGR.
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Oblong, Inc. generated $-3M FCF in 2024 (+56% vs 2021). Atlassian Corporation generated $1B FCF in 2025 (+76% vs 2021).
OBLG vs TEAM: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OBLG or TEAM a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) a "Buy" — based on 42 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — OBLG or TEAM?
Over the past 5 years, Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) delivered a total return of -70.1%, compared to -100.0% for Oblong, Inc. (OBLG). A $10,000 investment in TEAM five years ago would be worth approximately $3K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TEAM returned +216.1% versus OBLG's -100.0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — OBLG or TEAM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) is the lower-risk stock at 1.43β versus Oblong, Inc.'s 2.12β — meaning OBLG is approximately 49% more volatile than TEAM relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — OBLG or TEAM?
Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) is the more profitable company, earning -4.9% net margin versus -170.0% for Oblong, Inc. — meaning it keeps -4.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TEAM leads at -2.5% versus -176.7% for OBLG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TEAM leads at 82.8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — OBLG or TEAM?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is OBLG or TEAM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+216.1% 10Y return). Oblong, Inc. (OBLG) carries a higher beta of 2.12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TEAM: +216.1%, OBLG: -100.0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between OBLG and TEAM?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.