ORA vs NEE

For growth investors, Ormat Technologies, Inc.

(ORA) is the stronger pick with 12. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 11. 0% for NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE). NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) offers the better valuation at 28. 4x trailing P/E (23. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, NextEra Energy, Inc.

(NEE) is the cheapest at 28. 4x versus Ormat Technologies, Inc. at 60. 5x. On forward P/E, NextEra Energy, Inc. is actually cheaper at 23. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NextEra Energy, Inc. wins at 1. 33x versus Ormat Technologies, Inc. 's 12. 98x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, Ormat Technologies, Inc.

(ORA) delivered a total return of +79. 4%, compared to +38. 2% for NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NEE returned +266. 0% versus ORA's +195. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NextEra Energy, Inc.

(NEE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 21β versus Ormat Technologies, Inc. 's 0. 77β — meaning ORA is approximately 273% more volatile than NEE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ormat Technologies, Inc. (ORA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 106% versus 144% for NextEra Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ormat Technologies, Inc.

(ORA) is pulling ahead at 12. 5% versus 11. 0% for NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ormat Technologies, Inc. grew EPS -1. 0% year-over-year, compared to -2. 4% for NextEra Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ORA leads at 10. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

NextEra Energy, Inc.

(NEE) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 9% net margin versus 12. 5% for Ormat Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NEE leads at 30. 1% versus 18. 5% for ORA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NEE leads at 62. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 33x versus Ormat Technologies, Inc. 's 12. 98x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) trades at 23. 1x forward P/E versus 53. 6x for Ormat Technologies, Inc. — 30. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ORA: 7. 9% to $132. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) offers the highest yield at 2. 4%, versus 0. 4% for Ormat Technologies, Inc. (ORA).

For long-horizon retirement investors, NextEra Energy, Inc.

(NEE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 21), 2. 4% yield, +266. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NEE: +266. 0%, ORA: +195. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

NEE pays a dividend while ORA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.