Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Ormat Technologies, Inc. (ORA) vs ReNew Energy Global plc (RNWWW) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | RNWWW | 19.4% revenue growth vs ORA's 12.5% |
| Value | RNWWW | Lower P/E (0.1x vs 43.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | ORA | 12.5% net margin vs RNWWW's 9.2% |
| Stability / Safety | ORA | Lower D/E ratio (13.8% vs 5.6%) |
| Dividends | ORA | 0.5% yield; RNWWW pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | ORA | +49.2% vs RNWWW's -93.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ORA | 2.0% ROA vs RNWWW's 1.2%, ROIC 2.7% vs 4.9% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Ormat Technologies is a geothermal and renewable energy company that develops, owns, and operates power plants while also manufacturing specialized energy equipment. It generates revenue primarily from electricity sales (around 70% of total) and equipment manufacturing/services (roughly 30%), with a small but growing energy storage segment. The company's moat lies in its proprietary geothermal technology and vertical integration—controlling everything from equipment manufacturing to plant operations.
ReNew Energy Global is a renewable energy developer and operator that builds and runs utility-scale wind and solar power projects in India. It makes money primarily by selling electricity through long-term power purchase agreements — with wind and solar generation contributing roughly 80% and 20% of revenue respectively — supplemented by engineering and maintenance services. Its competitive advantage lies in its first-mover scale in India's renewable market, a large project pipeline, and expertise in navigating the country's complex regulatory environment.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
RNWWW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Valuation Metrics). ORA leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
RNWWW is the larger business by revenue, generating $129.7B annually — 131.0x ORA's $990M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 12.5% (ORA) to 9.2% (RNWWW). On growth, RNWWW holds the edge at +37.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ORAOrmat Technologie… | RNWWWReNew Energy Glob… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $990M | $129.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $426M | $86.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $124M | $12.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$619M | -$23.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.6% | +77.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.9% | +48.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.5% | +9.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -62.6% | -18.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.6% | +37.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -25.4% | +94.8% |
Valuation Metrics
At 0.1x trailing earnings, RNWWW trades at a 100% valuation discount to ORA's 51.3x P/E.
| Metric | ORAOrmat Technologie… | RNWWWReNew Energy Glob… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.3B | — |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.7B | — |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 51.34x | 0.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 43.88x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 12.43x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.22x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.34x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.27x | 0.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RNWWW delivers a 8.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $2 for ORA. ORA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RNWWW's 5.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ORA scores 5/9 vs RNWWW's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ORAOrmat Technologie… | RNWWWReNew Energy Glob… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.5% | +8.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.7% | +4.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.5% | +6.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.14x | 5.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $411M | $691.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $281M | $40.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $692M | $732.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.29x | 86.76x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in ORA five years ago would be worth $12,531 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $34 for RNWWW. Over the past 12 months, ORA leads with a +49.2% total return vs RNWWW's -93.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ORA at 7.5% vs RNWWW's -75.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ORAOrmat Technologie… | RNWWWReNew Energy Glob… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.8% | +4.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +49.2% | -93.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.4% | -98.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.3% | -99.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +184.2% | -99.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.5% | -75.0% |
Risk & Volatility
RNWWW is the less volatile stock with a -0.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ORA's 0.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ORA currently trades 78.2% from its 52-week high vs RNWWW's 3.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ORAOrmat Technologie… | RNWWWReNew Energy Glob… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.54x | -0.16x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $132.58 | $0.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $64.39 | $0.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.2% | +3.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 31.0 | 44.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 494K | 13K |
Analyst Outlook
ORA is the only dividend payer here at 0.46% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ORAOrmat Technologie… | RNWWWReNew Energy Glob… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $132.71 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.47 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | — |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Feb 21 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ormat Technologies,… (ORA) | 100 | 107.89 | +7.9% |
| ReNew Energy Global… (RNWWW) | 100 | 0.22 | -99.8% |
Ormat Technologies,… (ORA) returned +25% over 5 years vs ReNew Energy Global… (RNWWW)'s -100%. A $10,000 investment in ORA 5 years ago would be worth $12,531 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ormat Technologies,… (ORA) | $663M | $990M | +49.3% |
| ReNew Energy Global… (RNWWW) | $13.1B | $97.1B | +642.5% |
Ormat Technologies, Inc.'s revenue grew from $663M (2016) to $990M (2025) — a 4.6% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ormat Technologies,… (ORA) | 14.2% | 12.5% | -11.7% |
| ReNew Energy Global… (RNWWW) | 2.6% | 3.9% | +51.9% |
Ormat Technologies, Inc.'s net margin went from 14% (2016) to 13% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ormat Technologies,… (ORA) | 24.5 | 54.7 | +123.3% |
Ormat Technologies, Inc. has traded in a 25x–74x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~51x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ormat Technologies,… (ORA) | 1.77 | 2.02 | +14.1% |
| ReNew Energy Global… (RNWWW) | 1.13 | 10.92 | +866.4% |
Ormat Technologies, Inc.'s EPS grew from $1.77 (2016) to $2.02 (2025) — a 1% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Ormat Technologies, Inc. generated $-285M FCF in 2025 (+25% vs 2021). ReNew Energy Global plc generated $-26B FCF in 2024 (+45% vs 2021).
ORA vs RNWWW: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ORA or RNWWW a better buy right now?
ReNew Energy Global plc (RNWWW) offers the better valuation at 0.1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ormat Technologies, Inc. (ORA) a "Hold" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ORA or RNWWW?
On trailing P/E, ReNew Energy Global plc (RNWWW) is the cheapest at 0.1x versus Ormat Technologies, Inc. at 51.3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ORA or RNWWW?
Over the past 5 years, Ormat Technologies, Inc. (ORA) delivered a total return of +25.3%, compared to -99.7% for ReNew Energy Global plc (RNWWW). A $10,000 investment in ORA five years ago would be worth approximately $13K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ORA returned +184.2% versus RNWWW's -99.7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ORA or RNWWW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ReNew Energy Global plc (RNWWW) is the lower-risk stock at -0.16β versus Ormat Technologies, Inc.'s 0.54β — meaning ORA is approximately -446% more volatile than RNWWW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ormat Technologies, Inc. (ORA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 6% for ReNew Energy Global plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — ORA or RNWWW?
Ormat Technologies, Inc. (ORA) is the more profitable company, earning 12.5% net margin versus 3.9% for ReNew Energy Global plc — meaning it keeps 12.5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RNWWW leads at 53.5% versus 18.5% for ORA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RNWWW leads at 91.1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ORA or RNWWW?
In this comparison, ORA (0.5% yield) pays a dividend. RNWWW does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is ORA or RNWWW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ReNew Energy Global plc (RNWWW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.16)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RNWWW: -99.7%, ORA: +184.2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ORA and RNWWW?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: ORA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RNWWW is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.