Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare PSQ Holdings, Inc. (PSQH) vs Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | PSQH | 308.0% revenue growth vs LYFT's 9.2% |
| Quality / Margins | LYFT | 45.0% net margin vs PSQH's -178.9% |
| Stability / Safety | LYFT | Beta 1.40 vs PSQH's 1.98, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | LYFT | +3.7% vs PSQH's -75.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | LYFT | 31.5% ROA vs PSQH's -77.4%, ROIC -7.1% vs -481.5% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
PSQ Holdings operates a platform connecting American consumers with values-aligned businesses across local communities. It generates revenue primarily through its consumer products division — selling diapers, wipes, and other essentials — which accounts for the vast majority of sales, supplemented by platform subscription fees from businesses. The company's moat lies in its curated network of over 70,000 businesses and 1.6 million members who share common values, creating a trusted ecosystem that drives both product sales and platform engagement.
Lyft operates a digital ridesharing platform connecting passengers with drivers through a mobile app. It generates revenue primarily from taking a commission — typically 20-25% — on each ride fare, supplemented by subscription fees from its Lyft Pink membership program and enterprise transportation solutions. Its competitive advantage lies in its established two-sided network effect — a large driver base attracts more riders, which in turn attracts more drivers — and its brand recognition in North America.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
LYFT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). PSQH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
LYFT is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.3B annually — 248.2x PSQH's $25M. LYFT is the more profitable business, keeping 45.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PSQH's -178.9%. On growth, PSQH holds the edge at +37.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | PSQHPSQ Holdings, Inc. | LYFTLyft, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $25M | $6.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$36M | -$57M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$46M | $2.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$20M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.1% | +41.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -163.2% | -3.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -178.9% | +45.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -78.8% | +18.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +37.3% | +2.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.6% | -100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | PSQHPSQ Holdings, Inc. | LYFTLyft, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $5.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$2M | $5.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.37x | 2.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 21.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.09x | 0.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.79x | 1.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 4.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LYFT delivers a 86.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $87 in annual profit, vs $-3 for PSQH. LYFT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.41x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PSQH's 1.21x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PSQH scores 5/9 vs LYFT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | PSQHPSQ Holdings, Inc. | LYFTLyft, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.1% | +86.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -77.4% | +31.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.8% | -7.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -127.3% | -6.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.21x | 0.41x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | -$1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $36M | $1.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $33M | $1.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.55x | 80.43x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in LYFT five years ago would be worth $2,414 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $687 for PSQH. Over the past 12 months, LYFT leads with a +3.7% total return vs PSQH's -75.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LYFT at 11.4% vs PSQH's -59.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | PSQHPSQ Holdings, Inc. | LYFTLyft, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -38.1% | -30.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -75.1% | +3.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.5% | +38.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.1% | -75.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.1% | -82.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -59.7% | +11.4% |
Risk & Volatility
LYFT is the less volatile stock with a 1.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PSQH's 1.98 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LYFT currently trades 54.2% from its 52-week high vs PSQH's 23.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | PSQHPSQ Holdings, Inc. | LYFTLyft, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.98x | 1.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.88 | $25.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.62 | $9.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +23.0% | +54.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.2 | 38.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.8M | 12.9M |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | PSQHPSQ Holdings, Inc. | LYFTLyft, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $19.85 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 59 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +9.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Jul 21 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| PSQ Holdings, Inc. (PSQH) | 100 | 8.19 | -91.8% |
| Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) | 100 | 30.82 | -69.2% |
Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) returned -76% over 5 years vs PSQ Holdings, Inc. (PSQH)'s -93%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| PSQ Holdings, Inc. (PSQH) | $8843.00 | $23M | +262248.0% |
| Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) | $343M | $6.3B | +1739.9% |
Lyft, Inc.'s revenue grew from $343M (2016) to $6.3B (2025) — a 38.2% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| PSQ Holdings, Inc. (PSQH) | -258.6% | -2.5% | +99.0% |
| Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) | -198.9% | 45.0% | +122.6% |
Lyft, Inc.'s net margin went from -199% (2016) to 45% (2025).
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| PSQ Holdings, Inc. (PSQH) | 0.17 | -1.8 | -1158.8% |
| Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) | -2.87 | 6.81 | +337.3% |
Lyft, Inc.'s EPS grew from $-2.87 (2016) to $6.81 (2025).
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
PSQ Holdings, Inc. generated $-34M FCF in 2024 (-3406% vs 2021). Lyft, Inc. generated $1B FCF in 2025 (+717% vs 2021).
PSQH vs LYFT: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PSQH or LYFT a better buy right now?
Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) offers the better valuation at 2.0x trailing P/E (21.5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) a "Hold" — based on 59 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PSQH or LYFT?
Over the past 5 years, Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) delivered a total return of -75.9%, compared to -93.1% for PSQ Holdings, Inc. (PSQH). A $10,000 investment in LYFT five years ago would be worth approximately $2K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LYFT returned -82.3% versus PSQH's -93.1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PSQH or LYFT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) is the lower-risk stock at 1.40β versus PSQ Holdings, Inc.'s 1.98β — meaning PSQH is approximately 41% more volatile than LYFT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 41% versus 121% for PSQ Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — PSQH or LYFT?
Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) is the more profitable company, earning 45.0% net margin versus -248.7% for PSQ Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 45.0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LYFT leads at -3.0% versus -240.1% for PSQH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PSQH leads at 60.7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — PSQH or LYFT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is PSQH or LYFT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. PSQ Holdings, Inc. (PSQH) carries a higher beta of 1.98 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LYFT: -82.3%, PSQH: -93.1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between PSQH and LYFT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: PSQH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LYFT is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.