Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare QVC Group Inc. (QVCGB) vs MercadoLibre, Inc. (MELI) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MELI | 39.1% revenue growth vs QVCGB's -8.0% |
| Value | QVCGB | Better valuation composite |
| Quality / Margins | MELI | 6.9% net margin vs QVCGB's -38.8% |
| Stability / Safety | QVCGB | Beta 0.32 vs MELI's 0.88 |
| Dividends | QVCGB | 0.1% yield; MELI pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | MELI | -17.2% vs QVCGB's -96.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MELI | 4.7% ROA vs QVCGB's -48.8%, ROIC 20.8% vs -13.3% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
QVC Group is a video commerce retailer that sells products directly to consumers through live television broadcasts, digital streaming, and online platforms. It generates revenue primarily from merchandise sales — with categories like home, fashion, and electronics — and earns additional income from shipping fees and credit card partnerships. The company's moat lies in its unique broadcast infrastructure and established customer relationships that create an engaging, entertainment-driven shopping experience distinct from traditional e-commerce.
MercadoLibre is the dominant e-commerce and fintech platform across Latin America, operating online marketplaces and financial services. It generates revenue primarily from marketplace commissions and advertising fees (roughly 60%) and fintech services including payments, credit, and digital wallets (roughly 40%). The company's moat comes from its integrated ecosystem—combining e-commerce, payments, logistics, and credit—which creates powerful network effects and high switching costs across Latin America's fragmented markets.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
MELI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). QVCGB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
MELI is the larger business by revenue, generating $28.9B annually — 3.0x QVCGB's $9.5B. MELI is the more profitable business, keeping 6.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to QVCGB's -38.8%. On growth, MELI holds the edge at +44.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | QVCGBQVC Group Inc. | MELIMercadoLibre, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9.5B | $28.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3.1B | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3.7B | $2.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$25M | $10.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.4% | +44.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -36.5% | +11.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -38.8% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.3% | +35.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.6% | +44.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -170.0% | -12.5% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | QVCGBQVC Group Inc. | MELIMercadoLibre, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4M | $89.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.7B | $96.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.15x | 44.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 30.76x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 24.09x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 3.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 13.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.01x | 8.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MELI scores 5/9 vs QVCGB's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | QVCGBQVC Group Inc. | MELIMercadoLibre, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +29.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -48.8% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -13.3% | +20.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -10.6% | +28.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.69x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.7B | $7.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $905M | $3.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.6B | $11.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.98x | — |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in MELI five years ago would be worth $10,259 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,237 for QVCGB. Over the past 12 months, MELI leads with a -17.2% total return vs QVCGB's -96.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MELI at 12.9% vs QVCGB's -44.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | QVCGBQVC Group Inc. | MELIMercadoLibre, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.0% | -10.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -96.0% | -17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.5% | +44.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.6% | +2.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +103.9% | +1628.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -44.0% | +12.9% |
Risk & Volatility
QVCGB is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MELI's 0.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MELI currently trades 66.4% from its 52-week high vs QVCGB's 3.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | QVCGBQVC Group Inc. | MELIMercadoLibre, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.32x | 0.88x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $537.50 | $2645.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.91 | $1665.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.7% | +66.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.8 | 28.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 19 | 418K |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | QVCGBQVC Group Inc. | MELIMercadoLibre, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $2810.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.01 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +54.9% | +0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Jan 25 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| QVC Group Inc. (QVCGB) | 100 | 21.93 | -78.1% |
| MercadoLibre, Inc. (MELI) | 100 | 112.48 | +12.5% |
MercadoLibre, Inc. (MELI) returned +3% over 5 years vs QVC Group Inc. (QVCGB)'s -28%. A $10,000 investment in MELI 5 years ago would be worth $10,259 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| QVC Group Inc. (QVCGB) | $10.6B | $10.0B | -5.7% |
| MercadoLibre, Inc. (MELI) | $844M | $28.9B | +3321.7% |
MercadoLibre, Inc.'s revenue grew from $844M (2016) to $28.9B (2025) — a 48.1% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| QVC Group Inc. (QVCGB) | 11.6% | -12.9% | -210.8% |
| MercadoLibre, Inc. (MELI) | 16.1% | 6.9% | -57.2% |
MercadoLibre, Inc.'s net margin went from 16% (2016) to 7% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 4 Years
| Stock | 2022 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| MercadoLibre, Inc. (MELI) | 88.8 | 51.1 | -42.5% |
MercadoLibre, Inc. has traded in a 45x–89x P/E range over 4 years; current trailing P/E is ~45x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| QVC Group Inc. (QVCGB) | 1.03 | -3.25 | -415.5% |
| MercadoLibre, Inc. (MELI) | 3.09 | 39.39 | +1174.8% |
MercadoLibre, Inc.'s EPS grew from $3.09 (2016) to $39.39 (2025) — a 33% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
QVC Group Inc. generated $289M FCF in 2024 (-64% vs 2021). MercadoLibre, Inc. generated $11B FCF in 2025 (+2930% vs 2021).
QVCGB vs MELI: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is QVCGB or MELI a better buy right now?
MercadoLibre, Inc. (MELI) offers the better valuation at 44.6x trailing P/E (30.8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MercadoLibre, Inc. (MELI) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — QVCGB or MELI?
Over the past 5 years, MercadoLibre, Inc. (MELI) delivered a total return of +2.6%, compared to -27.6% for QVC Group Inc. (QVCGB). A $10,000 investment in MELI five years ago would be worth approximately $10K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MELI returned +1628% versus QVCGB's +103.9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — QVCGB or MELI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), QVC Group Inc. (QVCGB) is the lower-risk stock at 0.32β versus MercadoLibre, Inc.'s 0.88β — meaning MELI is approximately 180% more volatile than QVCGB relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — QVCGB or MELI?
MercadoLibre, Inc. (MELI) is the more profitable company, earning 6.9% net margin versus -12.9% for QVC Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 6.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MELI leads at 11.1% versus -8.1% for QVCGB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MELI leads at 44.5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — QVCGB or MELI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is QVCGB or MELI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MercadoLibre, Inc. (MELI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.88), +1628% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MELI: +1628%, QVCGB: +103.9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between QVCGB and MELI?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.