Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Remitly Global, Inc. (RELY) vs Toast, Inc. (TOST) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | RELY | 29.4% revenue growth vs TOST's 24.1% |
| Value | RELY | Lower P/E (14.5x vs 22.4x) |
| Quality / Margins | TOST | 5.6% net margin vs RELY's 1.4% |
| Stability / Safety | RELY | Beta 0.95 vs TOST's 1.51 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | TOST | -29.2% vs RELY's -30.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TOST | 10.9% ROA vs RELY's 1.7%, ROIC 30.8% vs 14.0% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Remitly operates a digital financial services platform focused on cross-border money transfers for immigrants and their families. It generates revenue primarily from transaction fees on remittances — earning a spread on foreign exchange rates — with additional income from its banking products like Passbook. The company's competitive advantage lies in its mobile-first digital platform that offers faster, cheaper, and more transparent transfers than traditional remittance channels, combined with deep understanding of immigrant financial needs.
Toast is a cloud-based restaurant management platform that provides point-of-sale systems, payment processing, and operational software to eateries. It generates revenue primarily through subscription fees for its software platform (about 25% of revenue) and payment processing fees from restaurant transactions (roughly 70% of revenue). The company's competitive advantage lies in its integrated ecosystem—combining hardware, software, and payments—which creates high switching costs for restaurants once they adopt the full Toast system.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
RELY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Valuation Metrics). TOST leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
TOST is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.2B annually — 4.0x RELY's $1.5B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.6% (TOST) to 1.4% (RELY).
| Metric | RELYRemitly Global, I… | TOSTToast, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $6.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $63M | $361M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $21M | $342M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $193M | $608M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.5% | +25.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | +4.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +5.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.5% | +9.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.7% | +22.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +190.9% |
Valuation Metrics
At 48.8x trailing earnings, TOST trades at a 9% valuation discount to RELY's 53.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RELY's 30.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TOST's 34.9x.
| Metric | RELYRemitly Global, I… | TOSTToast, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.5B | $14.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $13.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 53.87x | 48.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.52x | 22.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 30.69x | 34.87x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.14x | 2.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.18x | 7.80x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.82x | 23.49x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TOST delivers a 16.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $3 for RELY. TOST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RELY's 0.22x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TOST scores 7/9 vs RELY's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | RELYRemitly Global, I… | TOSTToast, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.6% | +16.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +10.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.0% | +30.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.9% | +15.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$350M | -$1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $542M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $192M | $40M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.03x | — |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in TOST five years ago would be worth $4,369 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,447 for RELY. Over the past 12 months, TOST leads with a -29.2% total return vs RELY's -30.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TOST at 13.0% vs RELY's 4.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | RELYRemitly Global, I… | TOSTToast, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.3% | -19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -30.4% | -29.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.1% | +44.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.5% | -56.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.5% | -56.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.5% | +13.0% |
Risk & Volatility
RELY is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TOST's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RELY currently trades 67.6% from its 52-week high vs TOST's 55.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | RELYRemitly Global, I… | TOSTToast, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.71 | $49.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.08 | $24.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.6% | +55.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.1 | 44.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.0M | 9.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RELY as "Buy" and TOST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 45.8% upside for TOST (target: $40) vs 22.8% for RELY (target: $21).
| Metric | RELYRemitly Global, I… | TOSTToast, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.50 | $39.82 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | +0.7% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Sep 21 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Remitly Global, Inc. (RELY) | 100 | 27.51 | -72.5% |
| Toast, Inc. (TOST) | 100 | 58.86 | -41.1% |
Toast, Inc. (TOST) returned -56% over 5 years vs Remitly Global, Inc. (RELY)'s -66%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Remitly Global, Inc. (RELY) | $1.1B | $1.6B | +42.7% |
| Toast, Inc. (TOST) | $665M | $6.2B | +825.3% |
Remitly Global, Inc.'s revenue grew from $1.1B (2015) to $1.6B (2025) — a 3.6% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Remitly Global, Inc. (RELY) | -2.8% | 4.2% | +250.1% |
| Toast, Inc. (TOST) | -31.4% | 5.6% | +117.7% |
Remitly Global, Inc.'s net margin went from -3% (2015) to 4% (2025).
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Remitly Global, Inc. (RELY) | -1.09 | 0.31 | +128.4% |
| Toast, Inc. (TOST) | -0.45 | 0.56 | +224.4% |
Remitly Global, Inc.'s EPS grew from $-1.09 (2015) to $0.31 (2025).
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Remitly Global, Inc. generated $296M FCF in 2025 (+1390% vs 2021). Toast, Inc. generated $608M FCF in 2025 (+3676% vs 2021).
RELY vs TOST: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RELY or TOST a better buy right now?
Toast, Inc. (TOST) offers the better valuation at 48.8x trailing P/E (22.4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Remitly Global, Inc. (RELY) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RELY or TOST?
On trailing P/E, Toast, Inc. (TOST) is the cheapest at 48.8x versus Remitly Global, Inc. at 53.9x. On forward P/E, Remitly Global, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14.5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RELY or TOST?
Over the past 5 years, Toast, Inc. (TOST) delivered a total return of -56.3%, compared to -65.5% for Remitly Global, Inc. (RELY). A $10,000 investment in TOST five years ago would be worth approximately $4K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TOST returned -56.3% versus RELY's -65.5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RELY or TOST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Remitly Global, Inc. (RELY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.95β versus Toast, Inc.'s 1.51β — meaning TOST is approximately 59% more volatile than RELY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Toast, Inc. (TOST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 22% for Remitly Global, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — RELY or TOST?
Toast, Inc. (TOST) is the more profitable company, earning 5.6% net margin versus 4.2% for Remitly Global, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5.6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TOST leads at 5.0% versus 4.7% for RELY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RELY leads at 59.5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is RELY or TOST more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Remitly Global, Inc. (RELY) trades at 14.5x forward P/E versus 22.4x for Toast, Inc. — 7.9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TOST: 45.8% to $39.82.
07Which pays a better dividend — RELY or TOST?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is RELY or TOST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Remitly Global, Inc. (RELY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.95)). Toast, Inc. (TOST) carries a higher beta of 1.51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RELY: -65.5%, TOST: -56.3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between RELY and TOST?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.