Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Sachem Capital Corp. 6.00% Note (SCCE) vs Public Storage (PSA) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | PSA | 2.7% revenue growth vs SCCE's -107.0% |
| Value | PSA | Better valuation composite |
| Quality / Margins | PSA | 39.5% net margin vs SCCE's -292.1% |
| Stability / Safety | SCCE | Beta 0.01 vs PSA's 0.45 |
| Dividends | SCCE | 1.5% yield; PSA pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | SCCE | +33.4% vs PSA's +5.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | PSA | 9.4% ROA vs SCCE's -6.9%, ROIC 13.5% vs -13.0% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Sachem Capital Corp. is a real estate finance company that originates short-term, secured loans to real estate investors for property acquisition and development. It makes money primarily through interest income from its loan portfolio — earning interest on loans secured by first mortgage liens on residential and commercial properties. The company's competitive advantage lies in its specialized focus on short-term real estate lending and its ability to provide quick financing solutions to investors who may not qualify for traditional bank loans.
Public Storage is a real estate investment trust that owns and operates self-storage facilities across the United States and Europe. It generates revenue primarily through rental income from storage units — with additional income from tenant insurance, truck rentals, and property management services — making it one of the largest self-storage operators globally. The company's competitive advantage lies in its massive scale, prime locations, and strong brand recognition that creates pricing power and operational efficiency.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
PSA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Valuation Metrics). SCCE leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
PSA is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.8B annually — 417.8x SCCE's $11M. PSA is the more profitable business, keeping 39.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SCCE's -2.9%. On growth, SCCE holds the edge at +82.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | SCCESachem Capital Co… | PSAPublic Storage |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11M | $4.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | $3.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$33M | $1.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $5M | $3.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -4.8% | +73.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -108.1% | +53.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.9% | +39.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +42.5% | +65.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +82.6% | +3.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +98.1% | +21.3% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | SCCESachem Capital Co… | PSAPublic Storage |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $53.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $206.0B | $63.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -25.37x | 34.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 30.53x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.57x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 14.00x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 11.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.16x | 5.78x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 86.47x | 16.91x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PSA delivers a 20.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-19 for SCCE. PSA carries lower financial leverage with a 1.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SCCE's 1127.83x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PSA scores 5/9 vs SCCE's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | SCCESachem Capital Co… | PSAPublic Storage |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -19.1% | +20.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.9% | +9.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -13.0% | +13.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -31.8% | +17.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1127.83x | 1.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $187M | $9.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $318M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $204.9B | $10.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 11.19x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in PSA five years ago would be worth $16,046 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,597 for SCCE. Over the past 12 months, SCCE leads with a +33.4% total return vs PSA's +5.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SCCE at 12.7% vs PSA's 4.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SCCESachem Capital Co… | PSAPublic Storage |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.7% | +18.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +33.4% | +5.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +43.0% | +14.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.0% | +60.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.0% | +64.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.7% | +4.7% |
Risk & Volatility
SCCE is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PSA's 0.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SCCE currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs PSA's 95.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SCCESachem Capital Co… | PSAPublic Storage |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.01x | 0.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.95 | $322.49 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.39 | $256.54 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.5% | +95.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.9 | 64.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 959K |
Analyst Outlook
SCCE is the only dividend payer here at 1.48% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | SCCESachem Capital Co… | PSAPublic Storage |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $301.22 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.35 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +100.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 22 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sachem Capital Corp… (SCCE) | 100 | 94.63 | -5.4% |
| Public Storage (PSA) | 100 | 68.55 | -31.4% |
Public Storage (PSA) returned +60% over 5 years vs Sachem Capital Corp… (SCCE)'s +26%. A $10,000 investment in PSA 5 years ago would be worth $16,046 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sachem Capital Corp… (SCCE) | $10.2B | $-2.1B | -120.7% |
| Public Storage (PSA) | $2.6B | $4.8B | +88.4% |
Public Storage's revenue grew from $2.6B (2016) to $4.8B (2025) — a 7.3% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sachem Capital Corp… (SCCE) | 60.9% | 18.8% | -69.1% |
| Public Storage (PSA) | 56.8% | 37.3% | -34.4% |
Public Storage's net margin went from 57% (2016) to 37% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Public Storage (PSA) | 31.1 | 28.8 | -7.4% |
Public Storage has traded in a 12x–38x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~34x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sachem Capital Corp… (SCCE) | 0.32 | -0.93 | -390.6% |
| Public Storage (PSA) | 6.81 | 9.01 | +32.3% |
Public Storage's EPS grew from $6.81 (2016) to $9.01 (2025) — a 3% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Sachem Capital Corp. 6.00% Note generated $13M FCF in 2024 (-100% vs 2021). Public Storage generated $3B FCF in 2025 (+40% vs 2021).
SCCE vs PSA: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SCCE or PSA a better buy right now?
Public Storage (PSA) offers the better valuation at 34.1x trailing P/E (30.5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Public Storage (PSA) a "Hold" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SCCE or PSA?
Over the past 5 years, Public Storage (PSA) delivered a total return of +60.5%, compared to +26.0% for Sachem Capital Corp. 6.00% Note (SCCE). A $10,000 investment in PSA five years ago would be worth approximately $16K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PSA returned +64.9% versus SCCE's +26.0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SCCE or PSA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sachem Capital Corp. 6.00% Note (SCCE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.01β versus Public Storage's 0.45β — meaning PSA is approximately 7076% more volatile than SCCE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Public Storage (PSA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 110% versus 1128% for Sachem Capital Corp. 6.00% Note — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — SCCE or PSA?
Sachem Capital Corp. 6.00% Note (SCCE) is the more profitable company, earning 1879% net margin versus 37.3% for Public Storage — meaning it keeps 1879% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SCCE leads at 844.1% versus 70.6% for PSA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SCCE leads at 100.0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — SCCE or PSA?
In this comparison, SCCE (1.5% yield) pays a dividend. PSA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is SCCE or PSA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sachem Capital Corp. 6.00% Note (SCCE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.01), 1.5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SCCE: +26.0%, PSA: +64.9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between SCCE and PSA?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. SCCE pays a dividend while PSA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.