Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Sound Group Inc. (SOGP) vs Grindr Inc. (GRND) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | GRND | 32.7% revenue growth vs SOGP's -1.9% |
| Value | SOGP | Lower P/E (0.5x vs 19.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | SOGP | -3.4% net margin vs GRND's -12.0% |
| Stability / Safety | GRND | Beta 0.72 vs SOGP's 1.64 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | SOGP | +6.0% vs GRND's -38.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | GRND | -11.2% ROA vs SOGP's -12.8% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Sound Group operates an audio-centric social entertainment platform where users connect through voice-based interactions. It generates revenue primarily through virtual gifting within its live audio rooms — where listeners purchase digital gifts for creators — and advertising on its platform. The company's moat lies in its early-mover advantage in China's audio social space and its proprietary audio technology infrastructure.
Grindr operates a social networking and dating app specifically for the LGBTQ+ community. It generates revenue primarily through subscription fees for premium features — which account for the vast majority of its income — supplemented by advertising on its free tier. Its key advantage is its dominant first-mover position and network effects within the niche gay dating market, creating a self-reinforcing user base.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
GRND leads in 4 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Valuation Metrics). SOGP leads in 1 (Total Returns).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
SOGP is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.0B annually — 4.9x GRND's $412M. SOGP is the more profitable business, keeping -3.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GRND's -12.0%.
| Metric | SOGPSound Group Inc. | GRNDGrindr Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.0B | $412M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $124M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$49M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $140M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.4% | +74.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.4% | +28.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.4% | -12.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.9% | +34.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +29.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +14.3% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | SOGPSound Group Inc. | GRNDGrindr Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.4B | $2.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.4B | $2.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.77x | -15.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.51x | 19.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 22.04x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 35.24x | 6.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.27x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 22.33x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SOGP delivers a -27.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-28 in annual profit, vs $-70 for GRND. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GRND scores 6/9 vs SOGP's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | SOGPSound Group Inc. | GRNDGrindr Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -27.6% | -69.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.8% | -11.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +34.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -35.0% | +23.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$422M | $235M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $442M | $59M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $20M | $294M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -215.63x | 7.24x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in GRND five years ago would be worth $10,645 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,593 for SOGP. Over the past 12 months, SOGP leads with a +604.9% total return vs GRND's -38.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SOGP at 24.2% vs GRND's 20.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SOGPSound Group Inc. | GRNDGrindr Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.6% | -14.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +604.9% | -38.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +91.4% | +76.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.1% | +6.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.4% | +6.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.2% | +20.8% |
Risk & Volatility
GRND is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOGP's 1.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GRND currently trades 45.3% from its 52-week high vs SOGP's 37.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SOGPSound Group Inc. | GRNDGrindr Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.64x | 0.72x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $37.00 | $25.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.18 | $9.73 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +37.3% | +45.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.3 | 57.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 81K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | SOGPSound Group Inc. | GRNDGrindr Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $14.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Feb 21 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sound Group Inc. (SOGP) | 100 | 37.45 | -62.5% |
| Grindr Inc. (GRND) | 100.19 | 103.09 | +2.9% |
Grindr Inc. (GRND) returned +6% over 5 years vs Sound Group Inc. (SOGP)'s -84%. A $10,000 investment in GRND 5 years ago would be worth $10,645 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sound Group Inc. (SOGP) | $454M | $2.0B | +348.0% |
| Grindr Inc. (GRND) | $104M | $345M | +229.9% |
Sound Group Inc.'s revenue grew from $454M (2017) to $2.0B (2024) — a 23.9% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sound Group Inc. (SOGP) | -33.9% | -3.4% | +89.9% |
| Grindr Inc. (GRND) | -12.5% | -38.0% | -203.7% |
Sound Group Inc.'s net margin went from -34% (2017) to -3% (2024).
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sound Group Inc. (SOGP) | -54.9 | -14 | +74.5% |
| Grindr Inc. (GRND) | -0.6 | -0.74 | -23.3% |
Sound Group Inc.'s EPS grew from $-54.90 (2017) to $-14.00 (2024).
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Sound Group Inc. generated $-39M FCF in 2024 (+37% vs 2021). Grindr Inc. generated $94M FCF in 2024 (+207% vs 2021).
SOGP vs GRND: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SOGP or GRND a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Grindr Inc. (GRND) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SOGP or GRND?
Over the past 5 years, Grindr Inc. (GRND) delivered a total return of +6.5%, compared to -84.1% for Sound Group Inc. (SOGP). A $10,000 investment in GRND five years ago would be worth approximately $11K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GRND returned +6.7% versus SOGP's -86.4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SOGP or GRND?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Grindr Inc. (GRND) is the lower-risk stock at 0.72β versus Sound Group Inc.'s 1.64β — meaning SOGP is approximately 129% more volatile than GRND relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — SOGP or GRND?
Sound Group Inc. (SOGP) is the more profitable company, earning -3.4% net margin versus -38.0% for Grindr Inc. — meaning it keeps -3.4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GRND leads at 26.9% versus -4.4% for SOGP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GRND leads at 74.6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Is SOGP or GRND more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sound Group Inc. (SOGP) trades at 0.5x forward P/E versus 19.9x for Grindr Inc. — 19.4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
06Which pays a better dividend — SOGP or GRND?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is SOGP or GRND better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Grindr Inc. (GRND) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.72)). Sound Group Inc. (SOGP) carries a higher beta of 1.64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GRND: +6.7%, SOGP: -86.4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SOGP and GRND?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.