Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Starz Entertainment Corp. (STRZ) vs Cineverse Corp. (CNVS) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CNVS | 59.1% revenue growth vs STRZ's -1.6% |
| Quality / Margins | STRZ | -5.4% net margin vs CNVS's -16.7% |
| Stability / Safety | STRZ | Beta 1.07 vs CNVS's 1.49 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | STRZ | -17.1% vs CNVS's -18.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | STRZ | -7.1% ROA vs CNVS's -13.4%, ROIC 0.4% vs 20.3% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Starz Entertainment is a premium subscription video service offering original series and movies to viewers in the United States and Canada. It generates revenue primarily through monthly subscription fees — both direct-to-consumer via its app and through partnerships with cable/satellite providers and streaming platforms. Its competitive advantage lies in its established brand recognition for premium content and exclusive licensing deals for popular film libraries.
Cineverse Corp. is a streaming technology and entertainment company that operates a portfolio of niche streaming channels and provides technology services to other streaming platforms. It generates revenue through a mix of subscription fees from its SVOD channels, advertising on its AVOD and FAST channels, and technology licensing fees to third-party streaming services. The company's competitive advantage lies in its proprietary streaming technology platform and its focus on underserved niche content categories — particularly genre films and enthusiast programming — which creates a defensible position in the fragmented streaming market.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
STRZ leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Valuation Metrics). CNVS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
STRZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.6B annually — 46.7x CNVS's $55M. STRZ is the more profitable business, keeping -5.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNVS's -16.7%. On growth, STRZ holds the edge at -7.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | STRZStarz Entertainme… | CNVSCineverse Corp. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.6B | $55M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.5B | -$2M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$140M | -$9M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$157M | -$13M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.8% | +53.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | -12.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.4% | -16.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | -22.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.5% | -60.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -72.1% | -113.2% |
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, STRZ's 1.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CNVS's 3.9x.
| Metric | STRZStarz Entertainme… | CNVSCineverse Corp. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $155M | $59M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $45M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.73x | 18.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.49x | 3.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.11x | 0.75x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.20x | 1.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 3.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
STRZ delivers a -21.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-21 in annual profit, vs $-24 for CNVS. CNVS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STRZ's 1.42x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CNVS scores 7/9 vs STRZ's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | STRZStarz Entertainme… | CNVSCineverse Corp. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -21.0% | -24.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.1% | -13.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.4% | +20.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.5% | +22.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.42x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | -$13M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $14M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $462,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.28x | -4.16x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in STRZ five years ago would be worth $8,286 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,075 for CNVS. Over the past 12 months, STRZ leads with a -17.1% total return vs CNVS's -18.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STRZ at -6.1% vs CNVS's -29.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | STRZStarz Entertainme… | CNVSCineverse Corp. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.1% | +43.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -17.1% | -18.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.1% | -65.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.1% | -89.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.1% | -94.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.1% | -29.5% |
Risk & Volatility
STRZ is the less volatile stock with a 1.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CNVS's 1.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | STRZStarz Entertainme… | CNVSCineverse Corp. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.07x | 1.49x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.98 | $7.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.00 | $1.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +40.4% | +40.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.0 | 66.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 105K | 238K |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | STRZStarz Entertainme… | CNVSCineverse Corp. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starz Entertainment… (STRZ) | $2.3B | $1.4B | -41.7% |
| Cineverse Corp. (CNVS) | $104M | $78M | -25.1% |
Starz Entertainment Corp.'s revenue grew from $2.3B (2016) to $1.4B (2025) — a -5.8% CAGR. Cineverse Corp.'s revenue grew from $104M (2016) to $78M (2025) — a -3.2% CAGR.
Chart 2Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starz Entertainment… (STRZ) | 2.1% | -15.4% | -821.1% |
| Cineverse Corp. (CNVS) | -40.0% | 4.6% | +111.5% |
Starz Entertainment Corp.'s net margin went from 2% (2016) to -15% (2025). Cineverse Corp.'s net margin went from -40% (2016) to 5% (2025).
Chart 3EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starz Entertainment… (STRZ) | 13.2 | -12.64 | -195.8% |
| Cineverse Corp. (CNVS) | -130.2 | 0.16 | +100.1% |
Starz Entertainment Corp.'s EPS grew from $13.20 (2016) to $-12.64 (2025) — a NaN% CAGR. Cineverse Corp.'s EPS grew from $-130.20 (2016) to $0.16 (2025).
Chart 4Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Starz Entertainment Corp. generated $-64M FCF in 2025 (-316% vs 2021). Cineverse Corp. generated $16M FCF in 2025 (+172% vs 2021).
STRZ vs CNVS: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STRZ or CNVS a better buy right now?
Cineverse Corp. (CNVS) offers the better valuation at 18.8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Starz Entertainment Corp. (STRZ) a "Hold" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — STRZ or CNVS?
Over the past 5 years, Starz Entertainment Corp. (STRZ) delivered a total return of -17.1%, compared to -89.3% for Cineverse Corp. (CNVS). A $10,000 investment in STRZ five years ago would be worth approximately $8K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STRZ returned -17.1% versus CNVS's -94.2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — STRZ or CNVS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Starz Entertainment Corp. (STRZ) is the lower-risk stock at 1.07β versus Cineverse Corp.'s 1.49β — meaning CNVS is approximately 39% more volatile than STRZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cineverse Corp. (CNVS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 142% for Starz Entertainment Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — STRZ or CNVS?
Cineverse Corp. (CNVS) is the more profitable company, earning 4.6% net margin versus -15.4% for Starz Entertainment Corp. — meaning it keeps 4.6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CNVS leads at 10.1% versus 0.9% for STRZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CNVS leads at 50.4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — STRZ or CNVS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is STRZ or CNVS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Starz Entertainment Corp. (STRZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.07)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (STRZ: -17.1%, CNVS: -94.2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between STRZ and CNVS?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.