Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) vs CXApp Inc. (CXAI) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TEAM | 19.7% revenue growth vs CXAI's -3.0% |
| Quality / Margins | TEAM | -3.3% net margin vs CXAI's -289.4% |
| Stability / Safety | CXAI | Lower D/E ratio (35.8% vs 92.1%) |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | TEAM | -73.6% vs CXAI's -84.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TEAM | -3.1% ROA vs CXAI's -41.7%, ROIC -110.3% vs -52.9% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Atlassian is a software company that provides collaboration and productivity tools for software development and project management teams. It generates revenue primarily through subscription fees for its cloud-based products — Jira, Confluence, Trello, and Bitbucket — with cloud subscriptions now representing over 90% of total revenue. The company's moat lies in its deeply embedded ecosystem within development workflows, creating high switching costs as teams coordinate work across its interconnected tools.
CXApp Inc. is a workplace experience platform provider that offers a SaaS solution for enterprise workplace management. It generates revenue primarily through subscription fees for its platform — which includes features like desk reservations, indoor mapping, and employee engagement tools — with enterprise customers paying recurring fees based on usage or seat count. The company's competitive advantage lies in its integrated platform that combines multiple workplace management functions into a single solution, creating switching costs for enterprise clients.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
TEAM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CXAI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
TEAM is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.8B annually — 1402.1x CXAI's $4M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -3.3% (TEAM) to -2.9% (CXAI). On growth, TEAM holds the edge at +23.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TEAMAtlassian Corpora… | CXAICXApp Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.8B | $4M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$79M | -$12M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$189M | -$12M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.3B | -$9M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +83.5% | +83.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | -3.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.3% | -2.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.0% | -2.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.3% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.7% | +53.1% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | TEAMAtlassian Corpora… | CXAICXApp Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.1B | $4M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.9B | $4M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -76.66x | -0.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.82x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.37x | 0.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 14.62x | 0.19x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.05x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TEAM delivers a -11.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-12 in annual profit, vs $-78 for CXAI. CXAI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TEAM's 0.92x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TEAM scores 7/9 vs CXAI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | TEAMAtlassian Corpora… | CXAICXApp Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -11.9% | -78.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.1% | -41.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -110.3% | -52.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.8% | -59.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.92x | 0.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.3B | $708,000 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.5B | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $6M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.72x | -13.39x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in TEAM five years ago would be worth $2,987 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $181 for CXAI. Over the past 12 months, TEAM leads with a -73.6% total return vs CXAI's -84.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TEAM at -23.0% vs CXAI's -73.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TEAMAtlassian Corpora… | CXAICXApp Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -51.5% | -46.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -73.6% | -84.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.3% | -98.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.1% | -98.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +216.1% | -98.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -23.0% | -73.9% |
Risk & Volatility
CXAI is the less volatile stock with a -0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TEAM's 1.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TEAM currently trades 26.2% from its 52-week high vs CXAI's 12.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TEAMAtlassian Corpora… | CXAICXApp Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.43x | -0.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $287.26 | $1.49 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $67.85 | $0.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +26.2% | +12.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 31.1 | 35.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.4M | 4.5M |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | TEAMAtlassian Corpora… | CXAICXApp Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $187.35 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 42 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +10.9% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 21 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atlassian Corporati… (TEAM) | 100 | 45.21 | -54.8% |
| CXApp Inc. (CXAI) | 97.35 | 2.68 | -97.2% |
Atlassian Corporati… (TEAM) returned -70% over 5 years vs CXApp Inc. (CXAI)'s -98%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atlassian Corporati… (TEAM) | $457M | $5.2B | +1041.1% |
| CXApp Inc. (CXAI) | $0.00 | $7M | — |
Atlassian Corporation's revenue grew from $457M (2016) to $5.2B (2025) — a 31.1% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atlassian Corporati… (TEAM) | 1.0% | -4.9% | -614.4% |
| CXApp Inc. (CXAI) | -3.4% | -2.7% | +21.1% |
Atlassian Corporation's net margin went from 1% (2016) to -5% (2025).
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atlassian Corporati… (TEAM) | 0.02 | -0.98 | -5000.0% |
| CXApp Inc. (CXAI) | -0.5 | -1.22 | -144.0% |
Atlassian Corporation's EPS grew from $0.02 (2016) to $-0.98 (2025) — a NaN% CAGR.
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Atlassian Corporation generated $1B FCF in 2025 (+76% vs 2021). CXApp Inc. generated $-7M FCF in 2024 (-1135% vs 2021).
TEAM vs CXAI: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TEAM or CXAI a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) a "Buy" — based on 42 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TEAM or CXAI?
Over the past 5 years, Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) delivered a total return of -70.1%, compared to -98.2% for CXApp Inc. (CXAI). A $10,000 investment in TEAM five years ago would be worth approximately $3K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TEAM returned +216.1% versus CXAI's -98.2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TEAM or CXAI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CXApp Inc. (CXAI) is the lower-risk stock at -0.14β versus Atlassian Corporation's 1.43β — meaning TEAM is approximately -1153% more volatile than CXAI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CXApp Inc. (CXAI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 92% for Atlassian Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — TEAM or CXAI?
Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) is the more profitable company, earning -4.9% net margin versus -271.7% for CXApp Inc. — meaning it keeps -4.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TEAM leads at -2.5% versus -192.4% for CXAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TEAM leads at 82.8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — TEAM or CXAI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is TEAM or CXAI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CXApp Inc. (CXAI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.14)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CXAI: -98.2%, TEAM: +216.1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between TEAM and CXAI?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.