Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare TotalEnergies SE (TTE) vs California Resources Corporation (CRC) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CRC | 5.1% revenue growth vs TTE's -3.0% |
| Value | TTE | Lower P/E (12.2x vs 45.3x) |
| Quality / Margins | CRC | 10.9% net margin vs TTE's 7.2% |
| Stability / Safety | TTE | Beta 0.49 vs CRC's 1.26 |
| Dividends | TTE | 4.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs CRC's 2.4% |
| Momentum (1Y) | TTE | +43.1% vs CRC's +35.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CRC | 5.7% ROA vs TTE's 4.5%, ROIC 14.5% vs 10.9% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
TotalEnergies is a global integrated energy company that produces and markets oil, natural gas, and increasingly renewable electricity. It generates revenue through four main segments: Exploration & Production (upstream oil and gas), Refining & Chemicals (downstream processing), Integrated Gas & Power (LNG and electricity), and Marketing & Services (retail fuel stations). The company's competitive advantage lies in its integrated model—spanning upstream production to downstream retail—and its strategic pivot toward low-carbon energy including LNG and renewables.
California Resources Corporation is an independent oil and natural gas exploration and production company focused exclusively on California. It generates revenue primarily from crude oil sales (~60%), natural gas and natural gas liquids (~25%), and electricity generation from its cogeneration facilities (~15%). The company's key advantage is its extensive mineral acreage position—approximately 1.9 million net acres—in a mature, high-barrier-to-entry California market with established infrastructure.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
CRC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). TTE leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
TTE is the larger business by revenue, generating $182.6B annually — 51.7x CRC's $3.5B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 10.9% (CRC) to 7.2% (TTE). On growth, TTE holds the edge at -1.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TTETotalEnergies SE | CRCCalifornia Resour… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $182.6B | $3.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $34.5B | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $13.1B | $384M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10.6B | $545M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.0% | +37.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +21.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.2% | +10.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | +15.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.6% | -11.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -22.9% | -79.9% |
Valuation Metrics
At 12.7x trailing earnings, CRC trades at a 5% valuation discount to TTE's 13.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TTE's 5.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CRC's 4761.3x.
| Metric | TTETotalEnergies SE | CRCCalifornia Resour… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $172.1B | $5.36T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $206.9B | $5.36T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.35x | 12.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.23x | 45.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.80x | 4761.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.91x | 1812.76x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.51x | 1.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.92x | 9999.00x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TTE delivers a 11.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $11 for CRC. CRC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TTE's 0.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TTE scores 4/9 vs CRC's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | TTETotalEnergies SE | CRCCalifornia Resour… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.2% | +11.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.5% | +5.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.9% | +14.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.0% | +13.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.52x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $34.8B | $851M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $26.2B | $372M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $61.0B | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.07x | 5.95x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in CRC five years ago would be worth $24,361 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $21,325 for TTE. Over the past 12 months, TTE leads with a +43.1% total return vs CRC's +35.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TTE at 14.4% vs CRC's 14.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TTETotalEnergies SE | CRCCalifornia Resour… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.3% | +26.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +43.1% | +35.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.7% | +49.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +113.3% | +143.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +155.4% | +1037.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.4% | +14.3% |
Risk & Volatility
TTE is the less volatile stock with a 0.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRC's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | TTETotalEnergies SE | CRCCalifornia Resour… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.49x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $80.35 | $60.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $52.78 | $30.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +98.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.4 | 61.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 696K |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TTE as "Buy" and CRC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 11.7% upside for CRC (target: $66) vs -6.6% for TTE (target: $75). For income investors, TTE offers the higher dividend yield at 4.75% vs CRC's 2.36%.
| Metric | TTETotalEnergies SE | CRCCalifornia Resour… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $75.00 | $65.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 33 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.8% | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.82 | $1.39 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.7% | +0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| TotalEnergies SE (TTE) | 100 | 161.82 | +61.8% |
| California Resource… (CRC) | 100 | 843.06 | +743.1% |
California Resource… (CRC) returned +144% over 5 years vs TotalEnergies SE (TTE)'s +113%. A $10,000 investment in CRC 5 years ago would be worth $24,361 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| TotalEnergies SE (TTE) | $127.9B | $189.8B | +48.3% |
| California Resource… (CRC) | $1.8B | $3.0B | +68.7% |
TotalEnergies SE's revenue grew from $127.9B (2016) to $189.8B (2025) — a 4.5% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| TotalEnergies SE (TTE) | 4.8% | 7.2% | +48.6% |
| California Resource… (CRC) | 15.9% | 12.7% | -20.1% |
TotalEnergies SE's net margin went from 5% (2016) to 7% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 8 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| TotalEnergies SE (TTE) | 13.2 | 10.9 | -17.4% |
| California Resource… (CRC) | 2.5 | 11.2 | +348.0% |
TotalEnergies SE has traded in a 8x–13x P/E range over 6 years; current trailing P/E is ~13x. California Resources Corporation has traded in a 1x–11x P/E range over 6 years; current trailing P/E is ~13x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| TotalEnergies SE (TTE) | 0 | 6.02 | — |
| California Resource… (CRC) | 6.76 | 4.62 | -31.7% |
TotalEnergies SE's EPS grew from $0.00 (2016) to $6.02 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
TotalEnergies SE generated $11B FCF in 2025 (-40% vs 2021). California Resources Corporation generated $350M FCF in 2024 (-25% vs 2021).
TTE vs CRC: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TTE or CRC a better buy right now?
California Resources Corporation (CRC) offers the better valuation at 12.7x trailing P/E (45.3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TotalEnergies SE (TTE) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TTE or CRC?
On trailing P/E, California Resources Corporation (CRC) is the cheapest at 12.7x versus TotalEnergies SE at 13.3x. On forward P/E, TotalEnergies SE is actually cheaper at 12.2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TTE or CRC?
Over the past 5 years, California Resources Corporation (CRC) delivered a total return of +143.6%, compared to +113.3% for TotalEnergies SE (TTE). A $10,000 investment in CRC five years ago would be worth approximately $24K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRC returned +1037% versus TTE's +155.4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TTE or CRC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TotalEnergies SE (TTE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.49β versus California Resources Corporation's 1.26β — meaning CRC is approximately 155% more volatile than TTE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, California Resources Corporation (CRC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 52% for TotalEnergies SE — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — TTE or CRC?
California Resources Corporation (CRC) is the more profitable company, earning 12.7% net margin versus 7.2% for TotalEnergies SE — meaning it keeps 12.7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRC leads at 22.0% versus 11.5% for TTE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRC leads at 40.6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is TTE or CRC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TotalEnergies SE (TTE) trades at 12.2x forward P/E versus 45.3x for California Resources Corporation — 33.0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CRC: 11.7% to $65.71.
07Which pays a better dividend — TTE or CRC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. TotalEnergies SE (TTE) offers the highest yield at 4.8%, versus 2.4% for California Resources Corporation (CRC).
08Is TTE or CRC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TotalEnergies SE (TTE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.49), 4.8% yield, +155.4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TTE: +155.4%, CRC: +1037%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TTE and CRC?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.