Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare TELUS Corporation (TU) vs Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | VZ | 2.5% revenue growth vs TU's 1.8% |
| Value | VZ | Lower P/E (10.2x vs 20.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | VZ | 12.4% net margin vs TU's 5.4% |
| Stability / Safety | VZ | Lower D/E ratio (189.7% vs 189.8%) |
| Dividends | TU | 5.6% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs VZ's 5.4% |
| Momentum (1Y) | VZ | +22.7% vs TU's -3.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | VZ | 4.3% ROA vs TU's 1.9%, ROIC 8.0% vs 3.9% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
TELUS Corporation is a major Canadian telecommunications provider offering mobile, internet, TV, and security services to consumers and businesses. It generates revenue primarily from wireless services (mobile subscriptions and data plans) and wireline services (internet, TV, and home security), with wireless typically contributing over 50% of total revenue. The company's competitive advantage lies in its extensive fiber-optic network infrastructure and strong brand reputation for customer service in the Canadian market.
Verizon is a telecommunications giant providing wireless and wireline connectivity services to consumers and businesses across the United States. It generates revenue primarily from wireless service plans (~70% of total revenue) and equipment sales, supplemented by Fios broadband, video, and business solutions. The company's key advantage is its extensive nationwide network infrastructure—particularly its 5G leadership—which creates high switching costs for customers and barriers to entry for competitors.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
VZ leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Financial Metrics and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
VZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $138.5B annually — 6.8x TU's $20.5B. VZ is the more profitable business, keeping 12.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TU's 5.4%.
| Metric | TUTELUS Corporation | VZVerizon Communica… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $20.5B | $138.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7.6B | $47.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | $17.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.7B | $23.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.7% | +55.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +21.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | +12.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.1% | +16.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.1% | +1.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -25.0% | +50.0% |
Valuation Metrics
At 12.3x trailing earnings, VZ trades at a 53% valuation discount to TU's 26.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, VZ's 8.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TU's 9.1x.
| Metric | TUTELUS Corporation | VZVerizon Communica… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21.4B | $211.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $42.5B | $393.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 26.12x | 12.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.63x | 10.22x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.06x | 8.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.43x | 1.53x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.74x | 2.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.49x | 10.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VZ delivers a 16.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $7 for TU. VZ carries lower financial leverage with a 1.90x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TU's 1.90x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VZ scores 6/9 vs TU's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | TUTELUS Corporation | VZVerizon Communica… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.7% | +16.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.9% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.9% | +8.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.8% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.90x | 1.90x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $28.8B | $181.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.6B | $19.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $31.5B | $200.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 4.37x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in VZ five years ago would be worth $11,437 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,345 for TU. Over the past 12 months, VZ leads with a +22.7% total return vs TU's -3.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VZ at 14.5% vs TU's -4.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TUTELUS Corporation | VZVerizon Communica… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.8% | +25.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -3.5% | +22.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.8% | +49.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.6% | +14.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.7% | +48.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.8% | +14.5% |
Risk & Volatility
TU is the less volatile stock with a -0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VZ's 0.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VZ currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs TU's 82.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TUTELUS Corporation | VZVerizon Communica… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.02x | 0.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.74 | $50.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.54 | $10.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.1% | +99.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.7 | 66.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.7M | 28.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TU as "Buy" and VZ as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 64.4% upside for TU (target: $23) vs -1.6% for VZ (target: $49). For income investors, TU offers the higher dividend yield at 5.64% vs VZ's 5.41%.
| Metric | TUTELUS Corporation | VZVerizon Communica… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.59 | $49.36 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.6% | +5.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 10 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.06 | $2.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| TELUS Corporation (TU) | 100 | 73.42 | -26.6% |
| Verizon Communicati… (VZ) | 100 | 77.83 | -22.2% |
Verizon Communicati… (VZ) returned +14% over 5 years vs TELUS Corporation (TU)'s -7%. A $10,000 investment in VZ 5 years ago would be worth $11,437 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| TELUS Corporation (TU) | $12.7B | $20.5B | +61.1% |
| Verizon Communicati… (VZ) | $126.0B | $138.2B | +9.7% |
TELUS Corporation's revenue grew from $12.7B (2016) to $20.5B (2025) — a 5.4% CAGR. Verizon Communications Inc.'s revenue grew from $126.0B (2016) to $138.2B (2025) — a 1.0% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| TELUS Corporation (TU) | 9.6% | 5.4% | -43.5% |
| Verizon Communicati… (VZ) | 10.4% | 12.4% | +19.3% |
TELUS Corporation's net margin went from 10% (2016) to 5% (2025). Verizon Communications Inc.'s net margin went from 10% (2016) to 12% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| TELUS Corporation (TU) | 14.3 | 18.3 | +28.0% |
| Verizon Communicati… (VZ) | 7.2 | 10 | +38.9% |
TELUS Corporation has traded in a 12x–31x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~26x. Verizon Communications Inc. has traded in a 7x–15x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~12x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| TELUS Corporation (TU) | 1.03 | 0.72 | -30.1% |
| Verizon Communicati… (VZ) | 3.21 | 4.06 | +26.5% |
TELUS Corporation's EPS grew from $1.03 (2016) to $0.72 (2025) — a -4% CAGR. Verizon Communications Inc.'s EPS grew from $3.21 (2016) to $4.06 (2025) — a 3% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
TELUS Corporation generated $2B FCF in 2025 (+353% vs 2021). Verizon Communications Inc. generated $20B FCF in 2025 (+173% vs 2021).
TU vs VZ: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TU or VZ a better buy right now?
Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) offers the better valuation at 12.3x trailing P/E (10.2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TELUS Corporation (TU) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TU or VZ?
On trailing P/E, Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) is the cheapest at 12.3x versus TELUS Corporation at 26.1x. On forward P/E, Verizon Communications Inc. is actually cheaper at 10.2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TU or VZ?
Over the past 5 years, Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) delivered a total return of +14.4%, compared to -6.6% for TELUS Corporation (TU). A $10,000 investment in VZ five years ago would be worth approximately $11K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TU returned +59.7% versus VZ's +48.3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TU or VZ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TELUS Corporation (TU) is the lower-risk stock at -0.02β versus Verizon Communications Inc.'s 0.10β — meaning VZ is approximately -719% more volatile than TU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 190% versus 190% for TELUS Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — TU or VZ?
Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) is the more profitable company, earning 12.4% net margin versus 5.4% for TELUS Corporation — meaning it keeps 12.4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VZ leads at 21.2% versus 11.5% for TU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VZ leads at 45.6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is TU or VZ more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) trades at 10.2x forward P/E versus 20.6x for TELUS Corporation — 10.4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TU: 64.4% to $22.59.
07Which pays a better dividend — TU or VZ?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. TELUS Corporation (TU) offers the highest yield at 5.6%, versus 5.4% for Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ).
08Is TU or VZ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TELUS Corporation (TU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.02), 5.6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TU: +59.7%, VZ: +48.3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TU and VZ?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: TU is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; VZ is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 5%
- Dividend Yield > 2.2%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 7%
- Dividend Yield > 2.1%